Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I live in the Granite State in the south-central portion of the state. You can easily tell where the more suburbanized and urban areas of the state are. The northern areas of the state and areas with rougher terrain are much less populated.
It's going to be fun to see how these maps will change after the 2010 census. In Tennessee's case, there's going to be a lot more dark red in Nashville's ring counties and probably more green in some of West Tennessee's decaying farming counties.
This is the last page of a population projection report. If you scroll to the bottom of each page you can click on "previous" and see more information. Anyone in North Carolina may want to go to your local library and check in the reference section for a book called "The North Carolina Atlas." This is just one example of the vast amount of information presented in this book.
It's going to be fun to see how these maps will change after the 2010 census. In Tennessee's case, there's going to be a lot more dark red in Nashville's ring counties and probably more green in some of West Tennessee's decaying farming counties.
Yes it is going to be interesting in 2010, theres going to be alot more green in new york and many other parts of the northeast.
Yes it is going to be interesting in 2010, theres going to be alot more green in new york and many other parts of the northeast.
LOL Hardly.
Most of the Northeastern states are still GROWING just at a slower rate percentagewise then the "boom towns". Keep in mind also that gaining 3% of 300,000 people is a LOT less than gaining 1% of 8 million people.
Even if that wasn't the case, having 30,000 people move out of several million will hardly make a dent in those maps.
Most of the Northeastern states are still GROWING just at a slower rate percentagewise then the "boom towns". Keep in mind also that gaining 3% of 300,000 people is a LOT less than gaining 1% of 8 million people.
Even if that wasn't the case, having 30,000 people move out of several million will hardly make a dent in those maps.
I'm talking about the upper northeast not where most of the people are,
for instance upstate new york, central and western pa and parts of vermont, new hampshire and maine have lost population. I'm only talking about the places far from the major cities not the northeast as a whole.
this shows other states as well, as you can see upstate new york's counties has mostly population loss and/or little gain in which I think slow gain is the right type of growth.
Last edited by adirondackguy123; 03-10-2009 at 11:11 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
