Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is Pittsburgh a "big" city?
Yes 92 57.86%
No 51 32.08%
I don't know enough to have an opinion 16 10.06%
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2009, 03:06 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,131 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217

Advertisements

We should probably be defining what a big city is before we decide whether or not it's a big city. Pittsburgh is fairly well-known domestically and has a fairly large population in its metro and a dense urban core. It also has fairly good transportation links to the rest of the country (river and highways) and an international airport. For me, this qualifies as a mid-size city (which is pretty big).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2009, 03:07 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,131 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael84 View Post
lol no, we had to go get a hotel about 20 minutes from the airport.
Oh heavens, that must make your opinions so much more valid!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,933,384 times
Reputation: 1819
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Oh heavens, that must make your opinions so much more valid!

I was stranded in Pittsburgh during a snow storm, didn't rent a car, so we walked around everywhere and took taxis. How is that not a valid opinion? I spent time in the city and walked everywhere; therefore, seeing a lot I think that's a little more valid than being stuck at an airport for a few hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 05:17 PM
 
Location: SW Pennsylvania
870 posts, read 1,569,035 times
Reputation: 861
To people in the Ohio Valley including the regions of eastern Ohio and much of West Virginia, this is the nearest major city. In fact, Pittsburgh is the largest city in the Appalachians.

As someone who has to been to the large east coast cities, Pittsburgh doesn't feel as rushed and the people overall are a bit calmer compared to their northeastern counterparts. But why does a big city have to be push push shove shove and super fast paced?

Pittsburgh is a big city without the big city attitude. I think the hills kind of have a calming affect on the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,729,686 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilshire81182 View Post
Orlando is also about 2.1 million and I consider it Medium sized. For Orlando there is Miami, for Pittsburgh there is Philadelphia. These are large cities. Medium cities have a good ratio of amenities and attractions, but they are not large and all encompassing. They usually lack an aspect of notoriety or are not as cosmopolitan.
Do you feel there can only be one big city per state, even a state as large as Pennsylvania is geographically? It is one of the largest eastern states. Pittsburgh is not an outpost of Philadelphia. Pittsburgh is separated from Philly by a mountain range. Pittsburgh and western PA were not part of the original colony, and do not share the same history. When we took a trip from Pittsburgh to Philly one year, after we crossed the mtns, DH, an impartial observer from Omaha, NE, with no axe to grind, said "well, this part of Pennsylvania is certainly different from the western part of the state". There have been numerous discussions on the Pittsburgh forum about whether Pgh is an eastern city, a midwestern city, or something else; whatever it is, it's not east coast like Philadelphia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
We should probably be defining what a big city is before we decide whether or not it's a big city. Pittsburgh is fairly well-known domestically and has a fairly large population in its metro and a dense urban core. It also has fairly good transportation links to the rest of the country (river and highways) and an international airport. For me, this qualifies as a mid-size city (which is pretty big).
I would agree with that definition. I would add we could say the 50 largest metros in the US are "big cities".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,986,647 times
Reputation: 682
A large city or "big" in this case is 500k


Pittsburgh does not qualify..nor will it for years to come..

The metro yes.. is "big" 1,000,000+
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 01:55 AM
 
294 posts, read 659,245 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradly View Post
A large city or "big" in this case is 500k


Pittsburgh does not qualify..nor will it for years to come..

The metro yes.. is "big" 1,000,000+

"City" boundaries are political and nothing more. Urbanized area should be used instead as a benchmark as it includes the dense urban core of the region.

Using your logic, Jacksonville Florida would be a much bigger city and at the same time a much smaller metro than Pittsburgh. This is because Jacksonville's "city" boundaries are massive, including most of the sprawl of the metro inside its city limits. But you would be laughed at by most people if you considered Jacksonville to be a "big city".

Urbanized area constitutes the scientific boundaries of the city by using population density. In that statistic Pittsburgh would have over 1.5 million within the "urbanized area", which is more than Jacksonville's entire metro. So would that now qualify it as being a "big city" to you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 05:58 AM
 
Location: Hell's Kitchen, NYC
2,271 posts, read 5,146,753 times
Reputation: 1613
For me, it appears to be a perspective issue, like someone else said, as well as a terminology thing. I can see how someone from very large cities like NYC, LA or Chicago, might view Pittsburgh as small. Conversely, if you come from a town thats smaller than Pittsburgh then you might or live in a town nearby Pittsburgh it would probably seem huge. (I'm think of how Anchorage is the big city in AK.)

Do I think of Pittsburgh as a major city? Yes, however, I would be hesitant (in my own daily speech) to describe Pittsburgh as a "BIG city."

Quote:
Originally Posted by SewickleyPA View Post
But you would be laughed at by most people if you considered Jacksonville to be a "big city".
I think it depends more on who you ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 07:34 AM
 
6,339 posts, read 11,084,820 times
Reputation: 3085
It's a happy medium. Not too big and not too small.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 07:39 AM
 
93,255 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by SewickleyPA View Post
"City" boundaries are political and nothing more. Urbanized area should be used instead as a benchmark as it includes the dense urban core of the region.

Using your logic, Jacksonville Florida would be a much bigger city and at the same time a much smaller metro than Pittsburgh. This is because Jacksonville's "city" boundaries are massive, including most of the sprawl of the metro inside its city limits. But you would be laughed at by most people if you considered Jacksonville to be a "big city".

Urbanized area constitutes the scientific boundaries of the city by using population density. In that statistic Pittsburgh would have over 1.5 million within the "urbanized area", which is more than Jacksonville's entire metro. So would that now qualify it as being a "big city" to you?
Also, what people don't realize is that Jacksonville's boundaries are the same as Duval County. So, the urbanized area of Jacksonville is actually smaller than it's own limits due to being the same as Duval County. I believe the change came in the 1980's to make Jacksonville/Duval County one and the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top