Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Simple.. A good officer can catch a front license plate number on a city road and run your license plate as your drive by if he so wishes. Also if no one had front license plates then all the red light cameras would be useless.
Why can't the cameras be position to take a picture of the back plate instead?
Simple.. A good officer can catch a front license plate number on a city road and run your license plate as your drive by if he so wishes. Also if no one had front license plates then all the red light cameras would be useless.
Best case I've heard yet for doing away with frontal license plates.
If you take a look at the lists of states which do/do not require them, the states which don't are generally more free, and the states that do (NY! NJ! CA!) are becoming police states in general.
Following your rationale, why not get rid of number plates altogether?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.