Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We have 15% unemployment right now, and most of that 15% is comprised of males with no college education. A lot of them are big-time hunters.
What do you think they all are doing as we speak?
Preparing for WAR!!!!!
The Michigan Army is light years ahead of the rest of you punks. We've been in a depression for a decade already and we've been a little bored. So we started a huge army.
LOL.....I've read before that behind Pennsylvania and Texas, MI has the 3rd highest amount of liscensed hunters, so the weapons and talent are definitely there. Throw in the brutal winters and it would be like Germany vs. Stalingrad part II.
I certainley couldn't see Michigan ever being conquered.....if all else fails we could retreat to the UP, blow up the Mackinaw Bridge and just have to deal with the western front.
But to defeat Alaska (or any other large state with a small population) you do not have to invade all of it. Just the few populous and key areas. To take Alaska one would just have to conquer Anchorage and Juneau. Perhaps Fairbanks and a few strategic locales but that would be it.
Yeah, but you'd have to take and hold those areas...and Anchorage is not geographically small by any means.
The population would have the means to leave city limits, re-establish and then retake.
US vs. Taliban
Nazi-Germ vs. Russia
Napol-France vs. Russia
Hawaii or Rhode Island. Nobody would bother to invade/attack them, instead concentrating on bigger threats, until all the other states had blown each other up.
My money is on Hawaii, unless California developed a Surfer's Militia that paid 420 for every kill you make.
A similar thread like this recently was closed pretty quickly. Reasons: Negative, too vague, not specific, and not relevant. So why does this thread continue to exist?
A smiliar thread like this recently was closed pretty quickly. Reasons: Negative, too vague, not specific, and not relevant. So why does this thread continue to exist?
The only states I could see winning are California, Texas, and New York.
California: has the most people so that's an advantage, mountains would also be a good asset, may run into problems if they invade Texas or New York during their hot & humid Summers.
All 3 have good economies that would give them an advantage over most other states.
California is filled with gay's and sissy's...your arguement is invalid. jk (no hate)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.