Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In general, which of the 3 regions would you consider to be the fastest-paced: Pacific NW (Seattle, Portland)..Midwest (Chicago, Cleveland, Minneapolis)... South (Atlanta, Dallas). Or do you find the areas to be pretty similar in pace?
"Fast" pace as in people seem to be in a rush, fast drivers, impatience in daily situations, indifference between people, etc etc.
Big difference between rural and urban areas in all three regions. (Well, I'm not that familiar with the upper midwest so I'm making an educated guess there.)
Pretty hard to generalize the whole region. For instance, I'd consider Seattle a very fast-paced city (comparable to Dallas) but Portland is very much not. So, does that make the PacNW region "fast" paced? But frankly, if you take Seattle out of the equation, I think the PacNW is the slowest paced of the three.
If the Upper Midwest (MSP-Milwaukee-Chicago-Detroit-Cleveland) were separate from the Lower Midwest, then I'd say we have the fastest pace. However, if we're talking about specific cities, then Chicago and Seattle would definitely be the fastest with Dallas rounding out the top 3.
Last edited by EastSideMKE; 12-23-2009 at 09:21 PM..
Reason: grammar
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,926,305 times
Reputation: 1819
Midwest (mostly basing it on the influence of Chicago), then Northwest, then south.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.