Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleverfield
How do you know the things you are claiming are true, that "radical compassion" sets off the influence violent media? I think this would have to be studied before you could make such a claim.
|
No "claim" to be made; it's supported by the same reasoning behind research that finds watching media violence increases aggression. Observational learning is the basis of
it all. But to the extent that doing harm and doing good are mutually exclusive, there have been studies (on adults, mind you) that confirm that it isn't just observing bad things that can shape behavior. Observing good things can as well. Who'da thunk it?
Quote:
The UBC team conducted a series of tests that exposed individuals to phenomenal acts of compassion in news articles, music videos, and stories. They found a positive relationship between a subject experiencing “moral elevation” and the likelihood that he or she would donate the $15 received for participating in the study.
|
Witnessing Acts of Compassion Prompts People to Do Good | Inspiring Discoveries | Science | Epoch Times
I suppose I jumped ahead, figuring most of you had already concluded that if violence in the media could bring about violence in real life, compassion in the media could bring about compassion. My post was about addressing the disparity between truly memorable acts of violence and truly memorable acts of compassion in a child's field of vision growing up.