Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2015, 12:54 PM
 
496 posts, read 553,375 times
Reputation: 2156

Advertisements

The same people keep posting two sets of "memes" on my Facebook feed that seem - well - logically inconsistent to me. But I can't quite put my finger on the inconsistency. Maybe someone can help?

The "memes" basically go like this:

1. Don't say "retarded," say "mentally challenged," and we all should honor mentally challenged people and their struggles in life. [I have no problem with this].

2. Ignorance can be educated; crazy can be medicated; but there is no cure for stupid/idiots/morons.

Somehow, No. 2 feels like a way of getting around No. 1, and feeling superior while one is at it.

 
Old 08-18-2015, 12:59 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,801,062 times
Reputation: 6550
I think they mean entirely different things. "Stupid" is generally an opinion about the "wrongheaded" decisions someone makes. For example, liberals are stupid if you are conservative; conservatives are stupid if you are liberal.
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:08 PM
 
Location: TOVCCA
8,452 posts, read 15,050,766 times
Reputation: 12532
I think stupid is a low IQ and ignorant is a lack of education. Different things
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:23 PM
 
496 posts, read 553,375 times
Reputation: 2156
But, low IQ is the same as mentally challenged, isn't it? So in meme No. 1, these people are saying, don't criticize people who have low IQs.

But then they call people who see things differently from them, "idiots" and "morons." Aren't idiot and moron also terms for people with low IQs, i.e. mentally challenged?

It just feels hypocritical to me. If they don't like somebody's point of view, they could simply call them "wrong."
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,963 posts, read 22,138,411 times
Reputation: 26721
Are you serious? I have an adult child with Down syndrome and a low IQ and he is not stupid. Since I want to educate and eliminate ignorance here is the definition of "stupid": stupid - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com I could give you a few politicians as examples of people who appear to be stupid yet have at least normal IQs.

As for the OP, what is being said makes absolutely no sense at all. Comparing "ignorant", of which we can all be either in general or on specific topics, I suppose we need a definition of "ignorant": Ignorant | Define Ignorant at Dictionary.com and "crazy" which I am going to think OP is talking about the mentally ill (I know the whole post is so un-PC), "crazy" defined: Crazy dictionary definition | crazy defined with those that are, and this is the current PC term, "developmentally disabled", again explained: http://www.ici.umn.edu/welcome/definition.html and all I can really say is

My son is not stupid, is not a moron and not an idiot and neither are other people with developmental disabilities. Know that I would like to say a WHOLE LOT MORE.

Ignorance!
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:33 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,801,062 times
Reputation: 6550
I think there are 3 distinct things. Ignorance is not knowing. Stupid is knowing but having different priorities in reaching a decision than the person who calls the decision stupid. Mentally challenged is not having the capacity to learn what you need to know to make the decision. I don't think the statement #2 is intended to belittle people who are truly mentally challenged. It is used to belittle people who refuse to look at things from the perspective that someone else thinks makes more sense. I know some really smart people who disagree completely on politics, religion and other issues. they would call each other's ideas stupid.
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:38 PM
 
496 posts, read 553,375 times
Reputation: 2156
I definitely did not intend to offend anyone. I agree that low IQ does not mean "stupid." (I am not quite that ignorant).

I really hesitated to post b/c I could not be sure I could safely articulate what is bothering me about these 2 memes being posted by the same people. It seems like they want to put down people they don't agree with, by calling them intellectually insulting names. WHile at the same time, pretending to be very PC.

I resent that someone would go around saying that people are "idiots" and "morons" just because he or she does not agree with them. And then the same person puts up sanctimonious posts that seem to support intellectually challenged people.

That is all I was trying to say. It is a very sensitive subject, which is why I put it in "Great Debates."

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
Are you serious? I have an adult child with Down syndrome and a low IQ and he is not stupid. Since I want to educate and eliminate ignorance here is the definition of "stupid": stupid - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com I could give you a few politicians as examples of people who appear to be stupid yet have at least normal IQs.

As for the OP, what is being said makes absolutely no sense at all. Comparing "ignorant", of which we can all be either in general or on specific topics, I suppose we need a definition of "ignorant": Ignorant | Define Ignorant at Dictionary.com and "crazy" which I am going to think OP is talking about the mentally ill (I know the whole post is so un-PC), "crazy" defined: Crazy dictionary definition | crazy defined with those that are, and this is the current PC term, "developmentally disabled", again explained: About Developmental Disabilities and all I can really say is

My son is not stupid, is not a moron and not an idiot and neither are other people with developmental disabilities. Know that I would like to say a WHOLE LOT MORE.

Ignorance!
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:40 PM
 
496 posts, read 553,375 times
Reputation: 2156
Yes, I believe you have stated what I am thinking. What do you think about these people using the intellectually insulting terms "idiot" and "moron" against people who do not share their points of view? I think that is what is bothering me more than anything. I thought we had erased those terms from general discourse, right along with "retarded."

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
I think there are 3 distinct things. Ignorance is not knowing. Stupid is knowing but having different priorities in reaching a decision than the person who calls the decision stupid. Mentally challenged is not having the capacity to learn what you need to know to make the decision. I don't think the statement #2 is intended to belittle people who are truly mentally challenged. It is used to belittle people who refuse to look at things from the perspective that someone else thinks makes more sense. I know some really smart people who disagree completely on politics, religion and other issues. they would call each other's ideas stupid.
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,914,319 times
Reputation: 32530
Call me old-fashioned, but I abhor political correctness. Therefore I see nothing wrong with the term "mentally retarded" which is a legitimate word with a legitimate meaning. When I took psychology in college in 1963/1964, this term was used in textbooks and by professors. I continue to use it. When I first encountered the term "developmentally disabled" a couple of decades ago, I was greatly puzzled and I thought to myself, "What the hell is that supposed to mean"? Of course I eventually figured out that it is a neologism, a synonym for mentally retarded. Why people need to create new terms which have the same meaning as old terms is beyond me. For example, what is wrong with the term "venereal diseases" that it needed to be replaced with "sexually transmitted diseases"?

If there is a new concept, then a new term is appropriate. But if there is nothing wrong with an old term, what have we gained by pretending to be "modern" by using a new term for the same thing?
 
Old 08-18-2015, 01:51 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,801,062 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by yourown2feet View Post
Yes, I believe you have stated what I am thinking. What do you think about these people using the intellectually insulting terms "idiot" and "moron" against people who do not share their points of view? I think that is what is bothering me more than anything. I thought we had erased those terms from general discourse, right along with "retarded."
Forum debates have never been completely PC. I try to belittle bad ideas (from my perspective, but lots of posters in this very forum can tell you that I am incompetent) rather than people but some people are very tied up in their ideas and sometimes I get frustrated and lash out. I am human and as far as I know so are most other posters. I agree that people shouldn't do that but I don't think debating whether or not it is a good thing will change anything.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top