Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-31-2016, 03:35 PM
 
4,795 posts, read 4,821,734 times
Reputation: 7348

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
Yes, lets make things up to make our points!

Steve Buscemi, the actor, was a NYC firefighter. He is 5'9 and weighs 158lbs soaking wet. Less when he was younger. Do you really think he could carry a 200lb man out of a burning building? No and that was never the requirement even for fireMEN.

They typically have to carry EQUIPMENT weighing 50lbs and drag a 200lb mannequin. I am a woman with similar body characteristics as yours, and can drag (and have) adults out of harms weigh but I think you should make sure that if a woman EMT, fireMAN, or so on ever comes to your rescue that they should wait for a man and not help you because "stupid propaganda".
There are 150lb power lifters that can squat and deadlift over 500 lbs. Why is it a crazy thought that a 150lb firefighter couldn't carry a 200lb man? The "Fireman's Carry" in particular was designed to use leverage and weight distribution so people can carry a much heavier person for a long distance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2016, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,889,999 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanms3030 View Post
I had a professor in college in the late 90s who was a rampant commie/socialist. I sat through his lectures and got and A in his class and didn't turn into a commie. But he did teach me to think for myself
I'm sure most of us whether right or left experienced some form of this. I previously mentioned the marine biology professor at my community college alma mater's graduation saying "We had to spread the word about climate change and people will listen. Now don't get me wrong, I try to be green BUT I won't win people over that climate change is real. Seriously, look at the Congressional representatives who bring snowballs onto the floor of their legislative body saying it don't exist. I'm too pragmatic to be anything but a liberal leaning moderate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 08:45 PM
 
4,314 posts, read 3,995,499 times
Reputation: 7797
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
Yes, lets make things up to make our points!

Steve Buscemi, the actor, was a NYC firefighter. He is 5'9 and weighs 158lbs soaking wet. Less when he was younger. Do you really think he could carry a 200lb man out of a burning building? No and that was never the requirement even for fireMEN.

They typically have to carry EQUIPMENT weighing 50lbs and drag a 200lb mannequin. I am a woman with similar body characteristics as yours, and can drag (and have) adults out of harms weigh but I think you should make sure that if a woman EMT, fireMAN, or so on ever comes to your rescue that they should wait for a man and not help you because "stupid propaganda".
(3rd paragraph).........." out of harms weigh ".....?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 08:54 PM
 
2,997 posts, read 3,102,136 times
Reputation: 5981
From what I noticed, even in college, PARENTS indoctrinate kids way more than professors and teachers allegedly do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 09:08 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,045 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mentallect View Post
From what I noticed, even in college, PARENTS indoctrinate kids way more than professors and teachers allegedly do.
That's a parental right. Parents, through their property taxes and tuition aren't voluntarily payment teachers and professors to assume parental prerogatives. When they get the time, energy and focus to teach their topics and appropriate interpersonal behavior towards other students, and still have time left over, maybe then we can think about letting them set the political or religious views of students.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 09:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking Why Do People Say Schools Indoctrinate Students?

The ones saying that are simply repeating what they've been told via hate radio. It's SO much easier than thinking.

They've been Limbaughtomized.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 10:38 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,256,089 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
OK what about books like "To Kill a Mockingbird" that talks about racism. You can't white-wash that classic away because you can't talk about an issue starring you right in the face. As I said, the only times I really noticed indoctrination was in college but luckily I was in business school so I wouldn't be subjected to super-liberal professors...
In a college level class that uses the "kinda" classics that tie in to "the political/racial undercurrent of today"? And students know what they are signing up for?

Sure.

As long as the teacher or professor isn't going to give Cs to those he/she doesn't politically agree with.


But....not in a HS or MS English class.

Keep it all in the time-frame of when the book was written.

I took a "Something and Poetry" class as an English elective in HS. The teacher and I went head to head at one point b/c she didn't like my interpretations of the very obscure poems written by very obscure "poets" and I didn't let her get away with "well, this is how I see it and others have as well, so you lose".

Then don't ask for student interpretations (for a grade) if there is a "right way" to "interpret" and points are going to be taken off for lack of "coming to the same conclusion/like thinking".

Tell me what I need to think/write/ interpret "correctly" so I can get an A in an elective I wish I never took.

Last edited by Informed Info; 10-31-2016 at 10:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 11:11 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,889,999 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Informed Info View Post
In a college level class that uses the "kinda" classics that tie in to "the political/racial undercurrent of today"? And students know what they are signing up for?

Sure.

As long as the teacher or professor isn't going to give Cs to those he/she doesn't politically agree with.


But....not in a HS or MS English class.

Keep it all in the time-frame of when the book was written.

I took a "Something and Poetry" class as an English elective in HS. The teacher and I went head to head at one point b/c she didn't like my interpretations of the very obscure poems written by very obscure "poets" and I didn't let her get away with "well, this is how I see it and others have as well, so you lose".

Then don't ask for student interpretations (for a grade) if there is a "right way" to "interpret" and points are going to be taken off for lack of "coming to the same conclusion/like thinking".

Tell me what I need to think/write/ interpret "correctly" so I can get an A in an elective I wish I never took.
I could never respect those who could and would give C's for disagreements in views. I have no respect for professors that want reguritation and nothing that can challenge views. IMHO, college courses are supposed to challenge students thinking and even the professor due to the nature of research and support to a particular stance.

That said I think that To Kill a Mockingbird is a book that needs to be read in high school. It isn't too political that there is a problem with it, it's more to me Song of the South views on racism. Let's face it, it can be viewed as super-political if you are to press the issue of Mayella Ewell "allgeding" a disable black man touched her being like claiming the blacks getting shot by police deserving it, you can but on the surface (like how I was taught it) and when I was taught the idea with this story, it wasn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 11:14 PM
 
Location: colorado springs, CO
9,512 posts, read 6,099,317 times
Reputation: 28836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Your Mom should have told you that no firefighter should attempt to carry a 200-pound person out of a burning building unassisted. That is a recipe for disaster.

Meanwhile, gender-specific labels are often demeaning, even if not in the minds of those who use them. Seeking to blame a reader or listener is simply trying to shift an onus that belongs 100% on the author or speaker. Many need to mend their ways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
Yes, lets make things up to make our points!

Steve Buscemi, the actor, was a NYC firefighter. He is 5'9 and weighs 158lbs soaking wet. Less when he was younger. Do you really think he could carry a 200lb man out of a burning building? No and that was never the requirement even for fireMEN.

They typically have to carry EQUIPMENT weighing 50lbs and drag a 200lb mannequin. I am a woman with similar body characteristics as yours, and can drag (and have) adults out of harms weigh but I think you should make sure that if a woman EMT, fireMAN, or so on ever comes to your rescue that they should wait for a man and not help you because "stupid propaganda".
Great; why don't we get rid of the "Gender-Specific physical requirements" for our first responders!

Every one takes the same test; male or female (oops; there I go being gender-specific again ...)

...Oh wait; we already tried something similar to that where I live & it ended badly ...

Lawsuit: Colorado Springs female police officers allege discrimination in physical fitness test | Colorado Springs Gazette, News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2016, 11:31 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,889,999 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by coschristi View Post
Great; why don't we get rid of the "Gender-Specific physical requirements" for our first responders!

Every one takes the same test; male or female (oops; there I go being gender-specific again ...)

...Oh wait; we already tried something similar to that where I live & it ended badly ...

Lawsuit: Colorado Springs female police officers allege discrimination in physical fitness test | Colorado Springs Gazette, News
Yes because unlike the New York state troopers shooting over the car with a rifle, the test in question has little to no baring on the on-duty part of the job. This is like the whole fire fighters holding their arms out for five minutes being a part of the job testing over the carries, equipment or drags...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top