Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-15-2021, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,906 posts, read 24,413,204 times
Reputation: 32997

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wevie View Post
I've always heard it cost more to have an inmate on death row but don't understand why. Can you explain?


Also I almost have to laugh at the rehabilitation comment. Do you truly think inmates aren't being rehabilitated? Even the ones that are, what chance do they stand in society once released from prison with a felony record trailing behind them? It seems to me if they've served their time for the crime, they deserved a clean slate for a chance at a fresh start rather than their past continuing to punish them.
It's a long time ago now, but I had a nephew who ended up in prison for a couple of years, I think for selling drugs (although I don't know that for sure). I had little sympathy for him, but after he had been out for a while he said it just wasn't fair...he had learned to be a cook/chef somewhere along the line. If he put on an application that he had been incarcerated, he wouldn't get the job. If he didn't put it on the application, got the job, and they later found it, he'd get fired. Again, I had little sympathy because he's the one that did the crime, but I could understand his frustration.

 
Old 08-15-2021, 11:01 PM
 
28,687 posts, read 18,825,363 times
Reputation: 31003
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
It's a long time ago now, but I had a nephew who ended up in prison for a couple of years, I think for selling drugs (although I don't know that for sure). I had little sympathy for him, but after he had been out for a while he said it just wasn't fair...he had learned to be a cook/chef somewhere along the line. If he put on an application that he had been incarcerated, he wouldn't get the job. If he didn't put it on the application, got the job, and they later found it, he'd get fired. Again, I had little sympathy because he's the one that did the crime, but I could understand his frustration.
The question is, though: Do we want them going back to crime? Because shutting ex-cons out of an honest occupation is how you get them going back to crime.

I need to be convinced that there shouldn't be restrictions preventing employers for asking for that information for most positions. Otherwise, just give them all life sentences for everything.
 
Old 08-15-2021, 11:20 PM
 
14,415 posts, read 14,337,086 times
Reputation: 45774
Quote:
Originally Posted by wevie View Post
I've always heard it cost more to have an inmate on death row but don't understand why. Can you explain?


Also I almost have to laugh at the rehabilitation comment. Do you truly think inmates aren't being rehabilitated? Even the ones that are, what chance do they stand in society once released from prison with a felony record trailing behind them? It seems to me if they've served their time for the crime, they deserved a clean slate for a chance at a fresh start rather than their past continuing to punish them.
The appeals process. It is long and arduous before someone sentenced to death can be executed. The state must pay for legal counsel through the whole process as well.

Its easy to say "screw the appeals process, execute them!" However, the lengthy appeals process is exactly what has kept us from killing a number of innocent people who mistakenly ended up on death row. Those who oppose this process, in effect, say its all right if the innocent are executed.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 12:35 AM
 
1,438 posts, read 736,235 times
Reputation: 2219
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
The appeals process. It is long and arduous before someone sentenced to death can be executed. The state must pay for legal counsel through the whole process as well.

Its easy to say "screw the appeals process, execute them!" However, the lengthy appeals process is exactly what has kept us from killing a number of innocent people who mistakenly ended up on death row. Those who oppose this process, in effect, say its all right if the innocent are executed.
Also even if you are later found not guilty and charges dropped it's still on your record and getting your record expunged is not cheap, that's why I feel anyone falsely accused just get a lump sum of 100K for every year they sat in prison and a monthly salary from the state for life equivalent to the average salary of a district attorney, why? because they will never be able to find good paying honest work again and many of them had their youth stolen, years they will never get back. like this guy who spent 29 years in prison for a crime he did not commit, what do you even say to this guy, his prime years were stolen, he was locked up in his 20's and did not get justice until his 50's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr7Y02TnseQ
 
Old 08-16-2021, 05:37 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,124 posts, read 17,080,545 times
Reputation: 30278
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChileSauceCritic View Post
"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved." -Benjamin Franklin (1706–90)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Depends on one's outlook on society's duty to the individuals who constitute said society, I guess. I'm on Benjamin Franklin's side, here. "Proven guilty" has to be the standard - and both words are equally important.

When you stand accused of a capital crime, you're facing The State, with all of its resources and procedures aligned against you. The very least we can ask is that those considerbale resources and procedures are used to prove the case - convincingly. Rounding up the usual suspects is not how Western society is supposed to roll.
I feel like a broken record but very few capital crimes convicts are first-time offenders. Likely the accused crime is not unique. While there is a small chance that the accused is not guilty of the particular crime in question or has a smaller role in it than would warrant the death penalty, the chances are the typical capital convict is a "one man crime wave." While we have a responsibility to allow an accused to show reasonable doubt, we also have a responsibility to enforce the rule of law.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 09:14 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 26,009,248 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveklein View Post
Surveys vary with the exact percentage of people who oppose the death penalty... typically the number cited in the US is around 60% support its existence.

Yet I find it hard to believe that 40% of Americans oppose the state killing Osama Bin Laden. I'm guessing that number is probably closer to 10%. That would mean the vast majority of people who "oppose" the death penalty really only oppose it unless the crime is really, really bad, right?

If you don't think the state has the right to take away a human life for any reason, then why the absence of outrage from those who oppose the death penalty on Bin Laden's "murder"?
I oppose the death penalty because "thou shall not kill". I don't need to believe in god or even be religious, but the 10 commandments are a good way to live. If you put someone away forever without possibility of parole, they can't hurt others anymore. The only time I think killing is okay is if it is to prevent someone in the middle of a murder. That is saving others at the time of a crime.

So, I am part of the 40%. I don't really care what others think about it as I am my own person. Evil people can just be locked up.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 03:54 PM
 
Location: A blue island in the Piedmont
34,109 posts, read 83,054,663 times
Reputation: 43687
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg View Post
I oppose the death penalty ...
Good for you. I do as well.
Quote:
...because "thou shall not kill".
I don't need to believe in god or even be religious, but the 10 commandments...
It says thou shall not MURDER.
The old testament had no problem at all with killing.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 05:41 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,124 posts, read 17,080,545 times
Reputation: 30278
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
It says thou shall not MURDER. The old testament had no problem at all with killing.
That is the Jewish read of the Ten Commandments.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 07:19 PM
 
4,143 posts, read 1,883,362 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
It says thou shall not MURDER.
The old testament had no problem at all with killing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
That is the Jewish read of the Ten Commandments.
While the concept of a death penalty is recorded as an accepted practice in "the old testament" (the holy book known to Jews as the Tanakh), the Talmud advises that the death penalty should be used sparingly. It has been stated in the Talmud that any Jewish court that handed down a sentence of execution at least once within a period of seven years was "a destructive tribunal." Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya (who lived in the 1st century C.E.) went even further to say that a court was destructive if it handed down a sentence of execution once in seventy years. (Source: Mishnah Makkot 1:10).
 
Old 08-16-2021, 08:36 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 26,009,248 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
That is the Jewish read of the Ten Commandments.
Yep and I am certainly not Jewish, although the reformed Jews are very similar to a lot of mainstream christians.

Thou shall not kill is what I was taught and stick to it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top