Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-02-2009, 04:52 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,979 posts, read 18,965,269 times
Reputation: 22762

Advertisements

One of the Great Debates and Astounding Shake Your Head Moments of Our Time


Okay, the overall discussion point is this: why are we/you so reluctant to use the metric system of measurements rather than the English system?

DO NOT answer this question if your mind is closed on the matter and/or you can only think or respond with emotion. Just move on, there is nothing to see here. READ ON if you want to make a side-by-side comparison of a reasonably common conversion scenario and decide for yourself. Yes, I'm on somewhat of a crusade here. But read it. Think about it. And then decide.

================================================== ====

METRIC Problem:

You are spreading fertilizer over your large garden or field. You determine that you will need 3,450,000 cubic centimeters of fertilizer. The store only sells it by the cubic meter. How many cubic meters do you need?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intro to the metric system (it’s all you will need for the entire system)

- kilo - hecto - deka - meter - deci - centi - milli -

1) to covert from one unit to another, put your finger on the given unit (the prefixes on above table) and count across to the desired unit. Move the decimal that far and in the direction you counted.

Note: if the units are squared, double the number of places you move the decimal. If the units are cubic, triple the number of places you move the decimal.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Solution:
to count from the centimeter spot (above table) to the meter spot we go 2 spaces to the left. Because it is in cubic units we triple that: 6 spaces to the left.

3,450,000 cubic centimeters ----> 3.450000 cubic meters (3.45 cu m)

Hard???? Pffffftttt... whatever.


================================================== =======

ENGLISH Problem (equivalent to the above):

You are spreading fertilizer over your large garden or field. You determine that you will need 210,532 cubic inches of fertilizer. The store only sells it in cubic yards. How many cubic yards do you need?

Solution:
Well you already know the English system, right? I will give you the obvious:

12 inches = 1 foot
3 feet = 1 yard

Here is the answer if you are having a hard time: approximately 4.5 cu yd

================================================== =======


Okay, now!!! Even if you got the English conversion right off, you tell me which is less computationally intensive, which is less mistake prone, which is more intuitive, and which is less time consuming (time is money in business, right?).

The problem I gave you is very basic in either system. The nice thing about the metric system is that it is never any harder than what you did above for common conversions of distance, volume, and weight. They all work the same. In the English system, do distance, volume, and weight convert with the same equivalencies? No way.


So why are you so resistant again? (‘because that is the way we do it’ is not a legitimate answer. We used to ride on asses too.) Also, I’m talking in the abstract here. I realize that in some industries, converting would cost large sums of money. I’m just asking why, in general and abstract terms, we are so resistant--and base you answer on logic and thought, rather than emotion, please!!!


Epilogue: The metric system is base 10 just like our number system: they go together like a good-looking groom and beautiful bride. The English system is not base ten like our number system: they go together like a beautiful bride and a horribly disfigured Frankenstein.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:08 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,716,337 times
Reputation: 3925
Of course the Metric system is easier. It's all based on 10.

But part of the problem is that it's not what we know. And nobody is really comfortable with change. It's no different than when I got a different laptop computer at the beginning of this year. I hated it. Hated Vista, etc. Now I'm more comfortable with the computer, though I still don't like Vista...

Also, virtually everything in the United States is already set up on the Standard Measurement System. It would be absurd, from a practical and financial perspective, to change everything over.


That said, the conversions really are not that difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:16 PM
 
1,718 posts, read 2,303,015 times
Reputation: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
Of course the Metric system is easier. It's all based on 10.

But part of the problem is that it's not what we know. And nobody is really comfortable with change. It's no different than when I got a different laptop computer at the beginning of this year. I hated it. Hated Vista, etc. Now I'm more comfortable with the computer, though I still don't like Vista...

Also, virtually everything in the United States is already set up on the Standard Measurement System. It would be absurd, from a practical and financial perspective, to change everything over.


That said, the conversions really are not that difficult.
You stole my thinder, Rocks. This is exactly what I was going to say with one exception. I was going to say that the metric system is better which it is. But geeeez, you're going to take my foot away? My quart? Come on!

- Reel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,119,917 times
Reputation: 36644
As soon as we switch to the metric system, mathematicians will convince us that the duodecimal system is better, and metric won't work with base 12. (Yes, I know it would, because metric is not founded on base-10 arithmetic.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:20 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,716,337 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reelist in Atlanta View Post
You stole my thinder, Rocks. This is exactly what I was going to say with one exception. I was going to say that the metric system is better which it is. But geeeez, you're going to take my foot away? My quart? Come on!

- Reel
Well... We would also have the problem of all agricultural land being marked out in acres, quarters, halves and sections.

Where I grew up there is a road every mile - on the mile. For hundreds of miles in every direction, it's basically a mile-square grid.

Are they going to suddenly dig up all those roads and replace them on the kilometer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:21 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,979 posts, read 18,965,269 times
Reputation: 22762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
But part of the problem is that it's not what we know. And nobody is really comfortable with change. It's no different than when I got a different laptop computer at the beginning of this year. I hated it. Hated Vista, etc. Now I'm more comfortable with the computer, though I still don't like Vista...
Absolutely. This is the biggest roadblock. And of course, we are all prone to this. I absolutely abhor the new MS Word... I've become so annoyed with Microsoft in general that I've switched to linux! Oh the humanity...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
That said, the conversions really are not that difficult.
No they weren't. But you have to remember, the typical person nowadays can't do much more than balance a checkbook. I didn't want to get too wild and crazy. After teaching them for 15 years, I'm still amazed by what our public school system doesn't teach (mathematically). We're talking basic things like times tables.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:28 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,979 posts, read 18,965,269 times
Reputation: 22762
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
As soon as we switch to the metric system, mathematicians will convince us that the duodecimal system is better, and metric won't work with base 12. (Yes, I know it would, because metric is not founded on base-10 arithmetic.)
Or we could go binary... with our computer age and all...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,429,580 times
Reputation: 8672
It would make things easier, no more "13 mm or 1/2" socket debates.

I only think people don't want to change because its just what they are used to. Could you imagine the roads? Going to MPH to KPH, When the speed signs change from 90KPH, people will be doing 90 MPH on the interstates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:33 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,979 posts, read 18,965,269 times
Reputation: 22762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
It would make things easier, no more "13 mm or 1/2" socket debates.

I only think people don't want to change because its just what they are used to. Could you imagine the roads? Going to MPH to KPH, When the speed signs change from 90KPH, people will be doing 90 MPH on the interstates.
Yep. Exactly. And again, understandable. I don't think in KPH either unless I just look at the little numbers below the big ones on the speedometer for kicks. Although I have been training myself with Celsius lately...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,119,917 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
Or we could go binary... with our computer age and all...
I don't think I want to do binary in my head at the supermarlet. Let's see---cucumbers are 1001.110 a kilo, and I've got $10110.101 in my checking account, and I've already bought 111 eggs at 1010 a dozen . . . .

It would literally be easier to buy cucumbers at III for LXVII cents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top