Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2010, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,052,665 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by semperarmati View Post
Thine quiver would be arrow-less.
6. Cruising the forum, looking for a particular person who has humiliated you for your foolishness in the past, clutching at ad-hominem straws to try to attack them without presenting a single point in to support your attack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2010, 12:03 PM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,746,114 times
Reputation: 1336
That the "good" of society is more important than the "good" of the individuals who actually make up society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 12:20 PM
 
314 posts, read 189,652 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
6. Cruising the forum, looking for a particular person who has humiliated you for your foolishness in the past, clutching at ad-hominem straws to try to attack them without presenting a single point in to support your attack.
At least I am not attacking the greatest, most free country on the universe, or the institutions that have made her so. At least I don't attack capitalism or capitalists.

However, if you want to be ignored, so be it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Here
2,301 posts, read 2,035,700 times
Reputation: 1712
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
What would it be?

I might go ahead and just ban evasion or "what-about"-ism.

So for instance, if someone makes an argument about "X," people would no longer try to squirrel out of the topic altogether by ignoring subject X and bringing up subject "Y" instead.
Several years ago I opened a chatroom on AOL called STUMP THE GENIUS. I, a near moron, was the genius. I actual got a fair number of visitors. People would ask me random questions and I would quickly respond with a reply that seemed like it might be close. Of course I would never actually do any research. For example, someone might ask me the diameter of the planet Mars. I'd quickly reply with 7,201 miles (for example). The person would then tell me I was wrong and enter the correct distance. I would state that he was in error, I was indeed correct and he should "check his data source for accuracy". The other guy would insist he was right, and I'd calmly explain that I was the genius and therefore my answer was most assuredly correct. I would then suggest that he again "check his data source for accuracy". I'd absolutely infuriate people by insisting I was correct and they were wrong, despite the fact that I was probably never right. To make it all the more maddening for the poor guy, usually the other visitors in the chatroom would agree with me, after all, I sounded so wise and knowing.

Yeah, one of the great things about internet debating is that the person who is dead wrong can insist he is correct, and there's nothing that can be done to make him admit his error.

Last edited by GalileoSmith; 04-19-2010 at 01:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 01:19 PM
 
3,562 posts, read 5,231,928 times
Reputation: 1861
One? Just one? I can't do just one.

I call them set-ups. You know exactly what is being said. It is like a passive aggressive taunt. This then makes me want to reach through the screen and choke someone. From the get go it starts out with, am I a racist if? or I'm not racist but...

I recently encountered a debate, and I use that term as loosely as it is used here, where someone can say something so racist or homophobic, and then run and hide behind the line: Everyone is entitled to their opinions and you should just accept that. Well, ok then. Except for that whole part where you just told someone that they were genetically inferior. And when you point that out, they say your mean.

But, I guess you meant a real debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Richardson, TX
8,734 posts, read 13,830,848 times
Reputation: 3808
Just one is tough.

a couple of the most ubiquitous.

Straw man and post hoc ergo proptor hoc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 02:12 PM
 
5,019 posts, read 14,122,278 times
Reputation: 7091
Just one, huh?

Ok, the one I see so often on the C-D forums is what I like to call "Guilt by Association".

This happens whenever one takes up the cause of the less-fortunate.
For example, I just posted on the "homeless" thread. Let's just wait and see how long it takes before someone comes along and accuses me of being a) jealous of the rich b) on the public dole or c) a welfare queen

Great idea for a thread BTW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 02:46 PM
 
3,562 posts, read 5,231,928 times
Reputation: 1861
Aww, you know? It has been assumed at one point or another that I am a lesbian, African American, and Jewish and male. Male because I am old school and found a nic that is not tied to gender. You can tell it's coming when the reply has "your kind" in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Richardson, TX
8,734 posts, read 13,830,848 times
Reputation: 3808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandamonium View Post
Aww, you know? It has been assumed at one point or another that I am a lesbian, African American, and Jewish and male. Male because I am old school and found a nic that is not tied to gender. You can tell it's coming when the reply has "your kind" in it.
OOPS, wrong thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2010, 03:28 PM
 
191 posts, read 458,168 times
Reputation: 214
Can I just ban a word?

Heretofore.

I hate that word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top