Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2012, 09:07 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,024,220 times
Reputation: 3572

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
When you're comparing numbers based on subsidy per unit of production there is enormous gap. I don't know what the current numbers are but in 2007 it was about $0.44/MWh for coal. Wind and solar were getting $24.00/MWh. If you drop the subsidy for the coal you're not going to notice a 44 cent increase in your monthly bill, you'd certainly notice a $24 increase.
Coal doesn't set the price of electricity in very many places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2012, 11:03 AM
Rx_
 
Location: colorado
7 posts, read 7,651 times
Reputation: 14
There is not enough physical silver to accomplish this. Solar panels require silver. At this point in time, there are less than a billion above gound ounces. Peak silver was reached a while back. In the US, silver mining is producing over 50% less in 2012. China use to be a net exporter until 2012, now China is a net importer.

Some people talk about the "alternative to silver" or thin film. This process is so posionous, it only takes a couple of molecules per billion in drinking water to cause cancer. In China, a thin-film solar panel had a leak. Down the river several miles, some pig farmers rinsed out feeding troughs. They didn't use the water for drinking, just washing. The residual from the solar panel manufacturing killed the pigs. There was a massive demonstration of citizens there because of the cancer.
Silver on the other hand is safe for manufacturing. But, the destruction of silver (the consumption in manufacturing that can't be reclaimed) is higher then the manufacturing. Silver is used for anti-bacteria medical treatments in 3rd world countries, for drinking water purificaiton, for lead-less elecronic solder, and for solar panels.

Printing government cash won't magically create more silver. All the easy silver has been mined. This is why silver will very likely exceed $150 and ounce in 2013 - 2014.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top