Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-23-2012, 06:14 AM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
10,379 posts, read 10,963,325 times
Reputation: 18718

Advertisements

I like Nukes, what's not to like. Even the tree huggers should like nukes. They been proved safe for years now. Its cleaner and cheaper than coal. Tree huggers seem to want everyone to live on wind and solar electricity. What they refuse to accept is that it is impossible to supply everyone with a reliable source of power from these sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2012, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,571 posts, read 61,652,947 times
Reputation: 30576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
... slowest known building process Nukes? (typically a decade or more),
A quick check with google shows that in the US, through the 80s and 90s nuke production typically takes 4 to 6 years.

Example build times looking at three of the most recent new nukes:
25 October 1989 to 24 June 1995
14 September 1992 to 1 September 1997
5 December 1998 to 13 May 2004
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2012, 09:41 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,574,800 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
A quick check with google shows that in the US, through the 80s and 90s nuke production typically takes 4 to 6 years.

Example build times looking at three of the most recent new nukes:
25 October 1989 to 24 June 1995
14 September 1992 to 1 September 1997
5 December 1998 to 13 May 2004
Present times now scope around 10 years, but even your 4 to 6 years is about . . . 4 to 6 times longer than any other generation source.

But why with that long laundry list --

Quote:
non-insurable Nukes? (only way they can be built is the .gov gives them waivers on basic liability requirements)
.gov welfare Nukes? (80% of project cost is .gov underwritten)
surplus-base-load only Nukes? (Nukes totally miss the ability to meet day-time peak),
slowest known building process Nukes? (typically a decade or more),
most expensive electrical generators ever conceived Nukes? (usually make power bills Go Up when they come on-line)
no way to clean up the existing mess, let alone future . . . Nukes?
-- did you only pick out Building Timelines?

Guess you already know the rest is completely true?

You retiring out of the Nuke Navy and looking for a job?

There is a life-long job ahead in just cleaning up the mess left to US.

If we (could) clean up one of these messes a year . . . we would still be cleaning 100 years from now.

Heck of legacy to leave the kids.

We do not need to make more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2012, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,198,217 times
Reputation: 3614
You will have no choice but to have more nuclear power.
Your president has it out for coal.

He wants to phase out coal fired power plants.

Humm, what do you suppose they will be replaced with?
hint, It' won't be wind.


You want more power to charge your "smart" car?
Think nuclear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2012, 10:07 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,574,800 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by snofarmer View Post
You will have no choice but to have more nuclear power.
Your president has it out for coal.

He wants to phase out coal fired power plants.

Humm, what do you suppose they will be replaced with?
hint, It' won't be wind.


You want more power to charge your "smart" car?
Think nuclear.
Really?

No need for any new Nukes or Coal, at this point.

Electrical Power is so surplus, entire Coal generation sites are being parked --

Things have gotten to the point where the Utilities in Texas (strongest economy in the US, btw) are giving away power for free at night because it is so surplus. And that is with the surplus Coal sites shut-down.

As far as powering the car . . . or most of the US ground transportation for that matter . . . it can all be done by Solar from a small chunk of Nevada or Texas for the whole US.

The world and technology has changed. Nukes are legacy from the Cold War.

Only things lagging behind are old debt and some older folks mindsets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2012, 11:43 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,249,938 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Really?

No need for any new Nukes or Coal, at this point.

Electrical Power is so surplus, entire Coal generation sites are being parked --
If that's so why were numerous cities experiencing brown-outs this year and many more cities urging their populations to conserve on electricity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,198,217 times
Reputation: 3614
Really. is "Electrical Power is so surplus, entire Coal generation sites are being parked -"

It doesn't look like it.


Spreading Demand Thinner on the Power Grid

By KATE GALBRAITH

Published: September 19, 2012


AUSTIN, TEXAS — On sizzling-hot summer afternoons in Texas, when cranked-up air-conditioners cause electricity demand to surge, hotels sometimes dim their lobby lights. Air-conditioners may briefly pause, and farmers may stop running their electric water pumps.

Such adjustments reflect a simple truth: When electricity use spikes, power grid operators face a difficult choice if they want to avoid blackouts. They can turn on another power plant, which is costly and polluting or they can reduce the demand for power by encouraging citizens and businesses to cut back on needless energy consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2012, 10:30 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,574,800 times
Reputation: 4949
Probably forgot I work this market, so I know the real deal.

Here is the math:

The much hyped Texas Summer (Air Conditioning) Peak is about 6 hours a day for maybe 30 days per year, maximum (on both those numbers).

So that works out: 6 hours X 30 days = 180 hours or so per year.

Now consider the number of hours in a year: 24 hours X 365 days = 8760 hours.

Some goesina . . . 180 / 8760 = 0.02, or about 2%.

So this (mostly hype) Great Shortage, OMIGOD We Are A-Going Under Crisis is . . . ummm . . . about . . . [drum roll, please] . . . 2% of the overall Run Time.

Yeah 2%.

Can't keep the doors open for 2% of the time.

I know. We spent million$ on this site trying to keep it going this Spring.

UPDATE 1-Luminant to mothball 2 Texas coal units; winter demand seen up | Reuters

Shut down, now.

Here are a sample of the Free Night Electricity deals . . .

Save With Free Nights Plan | TXU Energy

So really, why is it so hard for the would-be Conservatives to understand that there is no "Energy Crisis?"

The Current Crisis is really figuring out how to deal with surplus in the Era of the End of Endless Growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,930,100 times
Reputation: 24863
Default Endless Growth - RIP

The "End of Endless Growth" is becoming a problem throughout the entire economy. E built a system since WW2 that measured economic success not just on making a profit but also becoming larger at an increasing rate every year. The rate of growth has slowed overall and actually reversed in some places. The investment computer programs and their managers do not know how to handle the current times.

IMHO we need to wean our electric utilities off coal as a fuel because of the gas and particulate pollution at the stack and the radioactive materials in the ash piles. Both of these costs have been externalized by the utilities and make coal an artificially low cost fuel.

These coal fired boilers should be replaced, possibly on the same sites allowing the continued use of the steam turbines and generators, with properly sized high temperature gas cooled nuclear reactors sized to provide steam for the existing engines. These reactors are not subject to the enriched fuel requirements of the water cooled reactors currently in use. These devices can operate on unenriched uranium as well as all manner of transuranic and breed able non fissile fuel. These can be at the heart of an electrical generation system that eliminates long half life waste as well as breeds more fuel than it uses.

As a country we would do well to have these plants built and operated by the federal government and supply electricity to the privately owned utilities on a wholesale basis. If we slowed or reversed the growth of our Military production complex we would have the energy to be completely free of foreign energy suppliers.

Last edited by GregW; 11-26-2012 at 07:17 AM.. Reason: attempt to reset font
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Ouch yonder
111 posts, read 157,774 times
Reputation: 167
What about the waste? Its not talked about much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top