Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-18-2013, 11:12 AM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,590,988 times
Reputation: 7457

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post

Suggesting that some third world construction approach is somehow environmentally more friendly than modern construction is just silly. Third world living often produces substantial pollution and horrible indoor air quality.
A wall made of solid wood, plastered with clay based plaster and painted with chalk-lime mix is by far superior to any first world miracle material and paint air quality wise. You simply can't forget that freshness. Adding first world ventilation to that is rather trivial. It does take time, if you make $10/hr hiring out that to professionals is not an option. Besides, most of the lower end building contractors serving plebeians are in for a quick buck, they avoid anything challenging and nonstandard. If you make $10/hr it makes much more financial sense to save and take a break from the wage world than to work in order to be able to afford the professional help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-18-2013, 11:31 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
A wall made of solid wood, plastered with clay based plaster and painted with chalk-lime mix is by far superior to any first world miracle material and paint air quality wise. You simply can't forget that freshness. Adding first world ventilation to that is rather trivial. It does take time, if you make $10/hr hiring out that to professionals is not an option. Besides, most of the lower end building contractors serving plebeians are in for a quick buck, they avoid anything challenging and nonstandard. If you make $10/hr it makes much more financial sense to save and take a break from the wage world than to work in order to be able to afford the professional help.
It costs more money and it's less energy efficient. It only make sense to DIY if you can build to code. Most $10/hr DIYers can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 11:41 AM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,590,988 times
Reputation: 7457
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
It costs more money and it's less energy efficient. It only make sense to DIY if you can build to code. Most $10/hr DIYers can't.
I lived in all kind of "up-to-code" buildings, it's my solid opinion that one couldn't get much lower energy efficiency than that, not speaking of noise and nasty stuff in the air. I have clay, wood, and sand. I don't know how you could claim it's more expensive DIY if one has to pay arm and leg for a tiny sheet-rock cage, not speaking of the rest that comes with a stick and plastic box. It's outrageously expensive to make financial sense for those at the bottom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 05:37 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
I lived in all kind of "up-to-code" buildings, it's my solid opinion that one couldn't get much lower energy efficiency than that, not speaking of noise and nasty stuff in the air. I have clay, wood, and sand. I don't know how you could claim it's more expensive DIY if one has to pay arm and leg for a tiny sheet-rock cage, not speaking of the rest that comes with a stick and plastic box. It's outrageously expensive to make financial sense for those at the bottom.
I understand that you don't have any technical background. It is still the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
These houses are cheaper because people don't comply with building code. ...
Or because building materials are cheaper, there could be a host of reasons for one house being cheaper.

Code enforcement may or may not be a factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Bend Or.
1,126 posts, read 2,926,537 times
Reputation: 958
[quote=RememberMee;27826286]A wall made of solid wood, plastered with clay based plaster and painted with chalk-lime mix is by far superior to any first world miracle material and paint air quality wise. quote]

But to heat it will have far greater envoronmental impact than to have built a code compliant home.
And codes today are far from where they were. They are far better.
And these comments are not just armchair quarterback comments, I have built a number of homes, and have spent the last three years researching Sustainable homebuilding technologies. A Sustainable home is built far better than code, not less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 07:40 PM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,590,988 times
Reputation: 7457
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
I understand that you don't have any technical background. It is still the truth.
I have more technical background than I would like. I do have first hand knowledge too. You must be in trades or something to defend indefensible. Construction costs are well known (add there significant probability of rip off on quality and price), average wages are well known too. If you are a proverbial "nice guy", seriously consider diy (not necessarily 100% of diy) because you'll be ripped off to shreds, it's a price of being "nice" to people.

We could argue about exact numbers. In my opinion if one makes anything less than $25/hr, it makes financial sense to save for a construction sabbatical instead of working for many, many, many years to pay off for construction/upgrade of your sheet-rock palazzo. Of course, many careers don't allow for sabbaticals, many locations don't allow for diy and/or "non traditional" designs, and so on, in that case get ready for 10+ years of peonage to pay for shelter that less developed savages could construct in a few weeks/months debt free. It would be really nice to have friends, neighbors and family to help you out, but that's more of fairy tale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 08:17 PM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,590,988 times
Reputation: 7457
[quote=whirnot;27833829]
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
A wall made of solid wood, plastered with clay based plaster and painted with chalk-lime mix is by far superior to any first world miracle material and paint air quality wise. quote]

But to heat it will have far greater envoronmental impact than to have built a code compliant home.
And codes today are far from where they were. They are far better.
And these comments are not just armchair quarterback comments, I have built a number of homes, and have spent the last three years researching Sustainable homebuilding technologies. A Sustainable home is built far better than code, not less.
I don't quite understand what codes you are referring to. I lived in traditional plastered log homes, they are very well insulated. It didn't take much of fuel to heat a house like that. Unlike a stick house (even well insulated) plastered homes have substantial thermal mass. There is no need for AC in the hay day of summer in the climates comparable to that of Columbus, Ohio. It's actually cool inside.

Sure the homes like that have their share of limitations. Most importantly, home building (even in less developed lands) becomes a wage occupation (instead of a communal enterprise) this sends prices skyrocketing. This leads to embracing less laborious designs. Solid pieces of wood are rather expensive too, thus all kinds of bricks are used instead of wood (don't try this in USA though, you'll be broke). Clay plasters and chalk-lime paints are laborious too, they almost extinct substituted with modern materials and techniques (including dry walling of brick homes). Brick is more versatile and it allows for construction of much more spacious homes, brick has relatively high thermal mass but it conducts heat better too. Uninsulated brick homes are cold in the winter but they are cool in the summer. With little bit of insulation (the right kind of brick) that could be fixed. Again, this sort of brick&mortar homes are unaffordable for an average American.

As for American home construction biz, I think it's balancing on the edge of absurd. All sorts of chemicals, plastic, etc. are used to save on labor in order to make stick homes affordable. Yet, home construction/renovation prices are at the levels making DIY and rolling back to basic materials and alternative designs very tempting, especially if you live in the sticks and you make average wages or less. Same with energy costs. Masonry heaters (had I have one) would save me substantial $. Costs of installing and operation of the modern heating systems makes financial sense only to the successful attorneys or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 08:48 PM
 
5,730 posts, read 10,127,514 times
Reputation: 8052
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Most building codes are there for a reason. These houses don't meet building codes. If you want to live a third world existence, move to a third world country.
My 80 acres IN THE US has no building code excepting the septic....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 05:21 PM
 
31 posts, read 40,005 times
Reputation: 18
Why shouldn't someone build a house DIY? Take Falling Water. $155,000 to build and around $11.5 million to restore. It is an architectural marvel but there were always structural problems with the build. Frank Lloyd Wright thought it would be cool to put a house over a creek in the woods. He didn't sweat the details.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top