Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-02-2009, 03:35 AM
 
1,297 posts, read 3,518,072 times
Reputation: 1524

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcrackly View Post
Exactly. I had this vision of locally owned, perhaps municipal, power generation, utilizing the peoples own resource-water. It will never happen.
This happened in Maine but it took some fighting. Madison Paper had a hydro damn that produced power, along with boilers at the paper mill. They approached the town and said "we have excess power and we are willing to sell it to the citizens of Madison." The town wanted it, but the PUC said no as the towns grid was owned by Central Maine Power. That was easy to fix. The town purchased the grid for their town and they have the cheapest electric rates in the state now.

It can be done, and there are island communities that do this as well here in Maine, but I do admit this is probably a rare occurrence overall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2009, 03:45 AM
 
1,297 posts, read 3,518,072 times
Reputation: 1524
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
I must be missing something. News reports indicate the developer is a small Portland Company. None of the major developers I know would bother with a three turbine plant. It's way too small to be economic.
This is where local information beats anything you can find on the internet. The landowner that these three windmills are on, has a son who works for the Windmill owner down in Portland. Of course its just an office with 2 desks and a phone with "private investors". I'm not saying this is a scandal of some sort...it's probably not, but in today's society you got to go beyond just what you find online. Companies often have very deep, and far reaching roots.

As for the windmills...you are right, this is just the first of many. There are 5-6 different windmill sites in development here. Freedom was just the first of 28 proposed for this county alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Way South of the Volvo Line
2,788 posts, read 8,013,886 times
Reputation: 2846
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenTap View Post
This happened in Maine but it took some fighting. Madison Paper had a hydro damn that produced power, along with boilers at the paper mill. They approached the town and said "we have excess power and we are willing to sell it to the citizens of Madison." The town wanted it, but the PUC said no as the towns grid was owned by Central Maine Power. That was easy to fix. The town purchased the grid for their town and they have the cheapest electric rates in the state now.

It can be done, and there are island communities that do this as well here in Maine, but I do admit this is probably a rare occurrence overall.

This is really intriguing. I have always heard the argument from the power companies that kilowatt generation MUST go into the NE grid at large and not segmented for direct local usage. I know this must be based on contractual commitments and profit margins and not electrical theory. So any precedent for partitioning off the grid is exactly what I think we should be aiming for in order to incorporate more local points of generation. Maine exports millions of kilowatt power to southern NE states that do more than their share of the consuming.
In addition I happen to know that the current technology of electrical distribution always involves a certain amount of "stray electricity" that simply is not harnessed. Most substation maintenance personnel deal with this regularly. We as residents deserve the cost benefit of our ample hydro power.The indirect benefit would be cheaper power available for commercial entities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Many of the mid size hydro plants in upper NY and New England are owned and operated by a company called BRASCAN, standing for Brazil and Canada. Look them up. Owning and not using the facilities is a way of maintaining control of the cost of operation information so the company’s rate requests will not face any challenges at PUC rate hearings.

I am leftly considered a political/economic leftist. Given my bias please, consider why does New England and the Northeast have the highest power prices in the country when our generation, transmission and generation resources are mostly privately owned. I would think the private market system would allow the competition that should provide us with the lowest prices. Why does the TVA with the extensive government ownership of the generators, transmission and distribution facilities have some of the lowest power prices. Just what is the advantage of private ownership of a natural monopoly to us as consumers?
It's got nothing much to do with private versus public ownership because both your private and public utilities are regulated monopolies. TVA has low costs, but so do the Southern Company and Duke Power. Central Maine Power has high costs, but so does Houlton Water Company. Old dirty coal fired plants produce "cheap" electricity along with a lot of environmental damage. TVA, Southern and Duke all operate a lot of coal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenTap View Post
But this is not true. A Dam in Cohoes,NY has fish friendly turbines. Its less efficient then a regular turbine, but still provides power to the grid.
I've seen some fish friendly turbines in development, but I don't think any have been operated commercially yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenTap View Post
This is where local information beats anything you can find on the internet. The landowner that these three windmills are on, has a son who works for the Windmill owner down in Portland. Of course its just an office with 2 desks and a phone with "private investors". I'm not saying this is a scandal of some sort...it's probably not, but in today's society you got to go beyond just what you find online. Companies often have very deep, and far reaching roots.

As for the windmills...you are right, this is just the first of many. There are 5-6 different windmill sites in development here. Freedom was just the first of 28 proposed for this county alone.
My information sources are a little deeper than an Internet site. Local information is useful, but what locals "know" to be true is often just town gossip, with little basis in fact. The overhead associated with two to three people is way more than a three turbine site can manage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,922,581 times
Reputation: 16265
Hydro is a good clean option for power. But it requires a lot of environmental mitigation for fish migration and flood concerns. So the permitting process is a challenge to say the least. They are not cheap projects either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Way South of the Volvo Line
2,788 posts, read 8,013,886 times
Reputation: 2846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oildog View Post
Hydro is a good clean option for power. But it requires a lot of environmental mitigation for fish migration and flood concerns. So the permitting process is a challenge to say the least. They are not cheap projects either.
These are aspects that already have been dealt with in Maine. There are several environmentally friendly hydro systems here and it is constantly improving as a result of conservation pressures. Our local problems have less to do with actual geologic and hydraulic concerns as power distribution litigation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 08:22 AM
 
1,297 posts, read 3,518,072 times
Reputation: 1524
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
It's got nothing much to do with private versus public ownership because both your private and public utilities are regulated monopolies. TVA has low costs, but so do the Southern Company and Duke Power. Central Maine Power has high costs, but so does Houlton Water Company. Old dirty coal fired plants produce "cheap" electricity along with a lot of environmental damage. TVA, Southern and Duke all operate a lot of coal.
This is probably splitting hairs, but coal fired power plants are #2 as far as effeciency goes. Natural gas power generation plants are actually the cheapest

As for Central Maine Power...I am not sure how they rate as they simply provide power delivery to many of us Mainers. That is a separate fee from the power I purchase. It used to be 10 cents a KW for power, and 6½ cents for delivery, but its changing with the tumbling economy. I will have to check my bill to see what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2009, 08:25 AM
 
1,297 posts, read 3,518,072 times
Reputation: 1524
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
My information sources are a little deeper than an Internet site. Local information is useful, but what locals "know" to be true is often just town gossip, with little basis in fact. The overhead associated with two to three people is way more than a three turbine site can manage.
Not any more. The Bingham Dam used to have 15 workers operating that hydro dam but now they are down to 3 maintenance workers with all controls being done from the dam owner in Florida. The same thing can be accomplished with windmills. Heck they change the oil in the gear boxes every 2 years. These new windmills are very low maintenance.

The green credits is not something dreamed up. Its fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top