Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2009, 03:33 PM
 
4,253 posts, read 9,453,396 times
Reputation: 5141

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maine Writer View Post
We checked into wind power a couple of weeks ago. It would take 14+ years to break even. That eliminated that idea.
Did you take into account future increases of power rates?

Last edited by nuala; 04-13-2009 at 03:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuala View Post
Did you take into account future increases of power rates?
Hmm, okay how exactly you do predict that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2009, 04:34 PM
 
4,253 posts, read 9,453,396 times
Reputation: 5141
My point exactly. How does one predict that a break-even point is 14 years, if the future power rates are unknown?

Based on historical rate increases, power monopolies, depleting fossil fuels, and research money, it is not unreasonable to predict a 50% to 100% increase in power rates 10 years from now. A break-even point of 14 years could really be 7 years then.

Last edited by nuala; 04-13-2009 at 05:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2013, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuala View Post
My point exactly. How does one predict that a break-even point is 14 years, if the future power rates are unknown?

Based on historical rate increases, power monopolies, depleting fossil fuels, and research money, it is not unreasonable to predict a 50% to 100% increase in power rates 10 years from now. A break-even point of 14 years could really be 7 years then.
Seven years is not bad.

Fourteen is not horrible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 05:15 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
The best thing you can do is cut your consumption in 1/2. The greenest kWh is the one you don't use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 08:42 PM
 
651 posts, read 1,562,757 times
Reputation: 342
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 08:45 PM
 
651 posts, read 1,562,757 times
Reputation: 342
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 12:50 AM
 
Location: Moku Nui, Hawaii
11,053 posts, read 24,031,211 times
Reputation: 10911
We have a 1,200 square foot house and are running it on a grid tie 4 kWh Photovoltaic system. It was installed last December for about $20K and we will be seeing tax rebates for the next several years to when the actual out of pocket expenses will be less than half that amount. Our electric bill is now $20 a month which pays for the meter and the just to be connected to the grid fee. The electric rates around here are roughly forty cents a kilowatt hour, so the payback time is less than five years.

We've been switching a lot of our cooking from gas (propane, there's no natural gas in Hawaii) to electric now that electric is essentially free so the gas bill has dropped a lot now, too. We chose solar PV panels since they don't have any moving parts and don't wear out. We also get quite a bit of sun around here, so that helped with our choice, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 02:23 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,952,353 times
Reputation: 11491
When you figure out how much energy you need to live then you can figure out how to obtain that energy at the lowest practical costs. All the "I have great sun in my backyard" stuff doesn't mean diddly squat unless they are your next door neighbor. Meshes with "I've never done it but this is what I heard..."

Start with a clean slate, see how much you can reduce your energy needs (you can't save energy and anyone telling you that you can is nuts). Once you reduced your needs to the lowest levels you can live with, measure the needs throughout the year in what you anticipate most weather conditions to be and your needs during those times. Once you have that info you can go about deciding what types of energy solutions you need.

Remember, electric is not a source of energy, it must be converted from a source by some means. Everything that converts energy to electricity will require some form of maintenance and that will have a cost. There is no "free" anything.

Anything that stores energy also consumes it, to varying degrees. You either use it or lose it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 08:47 AM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,403,981 times
Reputation: 3730
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
whether it is solar or wind or whatever?

What is the cheapest way to equip a house on one acre of land with equipment so that there is no electric bill each month?

and what would be the approximate cost
the first step is assessing your home energy usage, as others have stated. a good thing to do is possibly have a home energy audit performed. This will expose any obvious wasteful energy consumption. It may result in recommendations to add insulation, perform air sealing, etc. Once you know what your typical usage is, then you can determine what you can realistically cut. Why pay thousands of dollars to install solar on your property, but use it to power incadescent light bulbs, or even CFLs now that LEDs are available? My home is about 20% converted to LED bulbs, for instance. They still cost quite a bit, but what's the sense in buying a CFL now that LEDs are not ridiculously expensive?

Anyways, once you figure out your usage, then you know what your needs are. I think you're in south jersey, which is actually a decent location for solar. You could have a company come out and quote you for a system. I'm not sure if geothermal or windmill is an option for you, but that could be a good combined system.

It's really difficult to tell someone what the cost would be. but it's absolutely worth exploring, especially with incentives that exist in NJ presently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top