Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2009, 09:52 AM
 
Location: mid atlantic
314 posts, read 930,532 times
Reputation: 204

Advertisements

everyone interested in this thread should watch this....

Poisoned Waters | FRONTLINE | PBS Video
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2009, 09:53 AM
 
Location: mid atlantic
314 posts, read 930,532 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rtom45 View Post
The PA fish commission has consumption warnings/recomendations for all fish caught within the state. As might be expected, larger fish and bottom dwellers (catfish, carp, ...) have a higher concentration of chemicals. The guidelines are based on the detection of all chemicals not just mercury. They also suggest that in preparing fish, you remove the dark colored flesh along the sides and on the back.


Its not always bigger fish....in Delaware bay smaller flounder and blue fish are warned about....because its a nursery and they have not been to sea yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2009, 10:23 AM
 
23,591 posts, read 70,367,145 times
Reputation: 49231
I had not been particularly worried for myself abut eating too much mercury, but I held a somewhat strong concern over the levels being reported in streams and fish, based on various reports. However, a couple of days ago, I received this email from my brother:

I just received lab test results to determine if I have contracted heavy metal poisoning over the years as a result of working with toxic metals in my sculpture. Bottom line is that all tests (arsenic, lead, mercury and cadmium) are well below the toxicity threshold. End of story, right?
But wait. There's more information here than meets the eye.

I am a fish lover and seafood junkie. I love to fish--usually 50-100 days a year. I'm not a catch-and-release kind of guy. I don't like to play with my food. If it swims, crawls on the bottom or burrows in the mud, chances are I've eaten it. Regularly.

For over a decade I've eaten fish on average two meals a week. All of this is what I catch myself. It may have been from the Gulf of Maine, Lake Champlain, Gulf of Mexico, off the Florida Keys, swamp marshes in Florida, or any of the dozens of rivers, lakes and ponds here in Vermont. I've figured that my remaining life is just too short to be worried about dying or getting ill from mercury poisoning. Nonetheless, one might expect to see at least some significant presence of mercury in my body.

Not so. My mercury reading is <1 ug/spec. Reference range is <10 (toxic >50). So, all those pounds and pounds of fish eaten so regularly over the past 10-plus years appear to have contributed little or nothing in the way of mercury poisoning.

True, this is just one lab test done on a single individual. But I would suggest you consider it in
the context of prevailing media hype when making important lifestyle decisions.


While I wouldn't recommend young children or pregnant women start eating tons of fish, I think for normal adults the evidence is pretty clear that it is a non-issue. However... I am SURE my brother is happy that so many people buy into the idea. Here is a line from another of his emails:

"Took home a 5-pound (20-inch) largemouth and a 14-inch crappie. Left the rest to grow bigger. I don't fish XXXXX 'cause of the press of people, though it's not bad this time of year. But it's overfished."

It appears that the scare has taken a lot of pressure off the fish populations, and that decent size fish are again becoming abundant. Sooo - my take now is - Stay AWAY from those fish! Our family will help you avoid them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2009, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Ocean Shores, WA
5,092 posts, read 14,827,150 times
Reputation: 10865
I only eat fish from China.

It must be pure and healthy.

Or they wouldn't sell it in American stores.

Would they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2009, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
1,075 posts, read 4,309,976 times
Reputation: 872
Hahahaha! Good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2009, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Nort Seid
5,288 posts, read 8,876,504 times
Reputation: 2459
yuk. seen this? it's pictures of birds whose bellies are full of plastics.

current work
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2009, 02:54 AM
 
2,255 posts, read 5,396,472 times
Reputation: 800
Here's a further Mercury update in fisheries environment. Almost on par with the info from the other website I posted. "Our Stolen Future"

FWC: Fl. Fish: Mercury levels, intersex fish, D.O. etc. | Eco-voice.org (http://www.eco-voice.org/node/1402 - broken link)

The problem here is that no amount of political bickering , new forced laws or rule changes are going to correct anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2009, 06:55 AM
 
Location: In the Pearl of the Purchase, Ky
11,085 posts, read 17,530,236 times
Reputation: 44409
I lived near the Ohio River for almost 30 years and we heard those mercury reports but it didn't bother people around there very much. Seems like then with how many fish you would have to eat to be adversely affected, you would have to eat fish three meals a day plus snacks for several years. And I'm doing good to catch enough fish for one meal! lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2009, 08:26 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,356 posts, read 26,484,723 times
Reputation: 11350
I think the study is a bit misleading and panic inducing. It didn't test all streams, just a fraction of those in the U.S., and primarily those near denser areas. I'd expect many Eastern U.S. streams such as those in NJ, MA, CT, etc., to be contaminated, whereas many in, say, Alaska, may be much cleaner. Additionally, heavy metals occur naturally in some waters. Arsenic, mercury, etc., can all get into water quite naturally. Generally not in high enough concentrations to harm you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2009, 04:17 AM
 
Location: The Jar
20,048 posts, read 18,299,911 times
Reputation: 37125
All knowledge comes with a price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top