Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2009, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
915 posts, read 2,423,099 times
Reputation: 400

Advertisements

Pretty cool story this morning on Good Morning America, in which Greenville, SC was featured as prospering compared to the other Main Street. Overall a great story, and video, in the link below:

Tale of Two Main Streets: One Community Struggles, Another Holds Its Own - ABC News

Last edited by ckeegan; 06-07-2009 at 07:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2009, 08:02 PM
 
1,941 posts, read 4,467,794 times
Reputation: 971
As I said in another forum, this is definitely good publicity, and not bad for a little town of 60,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2009, 12:59 AM
 
5,590 posts, read 15,371,404 times
Reputation: 2765
I thought it was fairly interesting in the video package that the footage from Greenville was shot back when the trees were still dormant. I wonder why this story was so slow to be aired? If they could see Main Street now, they would realize that it is even more vibrant because the weather has warmed up and the pleasant shade under the trees is more attractive to pedestrians. It is also somewhat surprising that they didn't show any of RiverPlace in the package.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2009, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
915 posts, read 2,423,099 times
Reputation: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyliner View Post
I thought it was fairly interesting in the video package that the footage from Greenville was shot back when the trees were still dormant. I wonder why this story was so slow to be aired? If they could see Main Street now, they would realize that it is even more vibrant because the weather has warmed up and the pleasant shade under the trees is more attractive to pedestrians. It is also somewhat surprising that they didn't show any of RiverPlace in the package.
Totally agree that I was surprised by what they chose to show about Main Street in downtown Greenville. Then again, they also did a scene transition right before they actually showed the falls at Falls Park. River Place, Fluor Field, Westin Poinsett, etc. They could have chosen to show a much better picture of Greenville, but we still looked awesome compared to the alternative.

As for population, we could also get into another annexation debate, since the city of Rockford (IL) is 217% larger (in land mass) than Greenville, SC. Meanwhile, Greenville's MSA is 77% more populated than Rockford's MSA. Watching the story would make you think that Greenville is much smaller than Rockford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2009, 11:00 AM
 
Location: home state of Myrtle Beach!
6,896 posts, read 22,517,506 times
Reputation: 4565
Rockford has been in trouble for a long time. This is not news to me. I did not see the piece on TV though I did read the narrative from the link you posted. If there was a video there I missed it and will have to go back and check. They need high speed rail up there so they can go to Chicago for work but that is not likely to happen. Some probably make the drive but it's a miserable drive that probably averages 3 hours in rush hour. I know few people that would invest that amount of time into a commute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2009, 09:07 PM
 
4,657 posts, read 8,709,053 times
Reputation: 1363
Thanks for the link. Kinda bummed that they apparently shot it back in the winter. I really wish someone had the cajones to state the obvious, the cities where the economy is still flourishing is fairly conservative/republican, where as the areas that are in the toilet are all run by dems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2009, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
11,706 posts, read 24,776,888 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonrise View Post
Thanks for the link. Kinda bummed that they apparently shot it back in the winter. I really wish someone had the cajones to state the obvious, the cities where the economy is still flourishing is fairly conservative/republican, where as the areas that are in the toilet are all run by dems.
WTF? Greenville's unemployment is 9.6% which is above the national average. You're just mad because the courts are making Sanford accept the money. Wahh, wahh, wahh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 12:15 AM
 
5,484 posts, read 8,315,620 times
Reputation: 2243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonrise View Post
Thanks for the link. Kinda bummed that they apparently shot it back in the winter. I really wish someone had the cajones to state the obvious, the cities where the economy is still flourishing is fairly conservative/republican, where as the areas that are in the toilet are all run by dems.
That's debatable. Columbia is doing ok and its dem, and so is Atlanta. This thread isn't about politics. Let's please stick to the topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 07:25 PM
 
4,657 posts, read 8,709,053 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
WTF? Greenville's unemployment is 9.6% which is above the national average. You're just mad because the courts are making Sanford accept the money. Wahh, wahh, wahh.
The national % is 9.4, are you really going daffy over.02%?
Current Population Survey (CPS)

My point is, and I've seen this first hand is that people are leaving the midwest and northeast in droves (google Thomas Golisano) due to insanely high taxes; income and property. These people are relocating to the southeast, namely the Carolinas, Tennessee and Georgia as wells as Texas, where the taxes are much lower. The problem is they then turn around and vote in politicians that are very liberal and pro taxes, seemingly forgetting why they left in the first place; see NC electing Obama. I do not understand their disconnect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 07:28 PM
 
4,657 posts, read 8,709,053 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by motonenterprises View Post
That's debatable. Columbia is doing ok and its dem, and so is Atlanta. This thread isn't about politics. Let's please stick to the topic.
You are correct, but they're both very republican state wise. Look at most of the states that are losing the most jobs; nearly all very heavily run by libs. But, since you did ask so nicely, I will drop the politics talk. I promise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top