Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Personally, I'd have to stick with the 1911. It hasn't lost as many wars as Italy has.
yeah man you are right ............since the " impero Romano " and " serenissima repubblica di Venezia " .........are gone........we are losing our worriors reputation .........step by step, as you can mafia and other nughty stuff.
nowaday we are very able to cook spaghetti with tomato sauce
Beretta makes a fine weapon. I personally have a 92F/S and wouldn't trade it. I've sent thousands of rounds throughout it and have so far only had two failure to ejects.
ummm yeah it can happen check up --the castle system-- hope this tecnical word is correct and keep it oiled
heyyy.............where is end up ..........my sicilian friend .........not joe calderone...........which is his nik.............bull .....buuulll.............come on bull pop up
what in American for .... ummmm...........hey bull what's up
Don't need to carry a gun. If one carries a gun one is looking for trouble. Just my opinion which along with 2 dollars will get you a happy meal.
You may be amazed that it's just the opposite. I am not amazed however that the public has that uninformed perception.
Actually, on the contrary, we who carry guns are more prone to avoid trouble like physical confrontations. Almost all of us are trained in the legal aspect of carry (part of the requirements of a permit in most states), which includes a duty to retreat if a confrontation has the potential of turning deadly.
Without a gun - yeah I might respond with obsene gestures or some similiar act to an agressive but non-physical act (name-calling, etc). With a gun - a gunowners responsibility is to walk away without action. To not escalate. To retreat.
Those who legally carry (not those who own a gun for home defense or hunting) probably are more aware of gun laws and legal use of force than most police officers.
Those who legally carry (not those who own a gun for home defense or hunting) probably are more aware of gun laws and legal use of force than most police officers.
very true, a lot of ppl are against --------the order system---- but when they are getting in trouble cause criminal attaks ....they call the police
it seems a paradox but order legality give to you the safety the possibility to continue a normal life
ppl don't know what mean to wear a uniform and carry a gun
very true, a lot of ppl are against --------the order system---- but when they are getting in trouble cause criminal attaks ....they call the police
it seems a paradox but order legality give to you the safety the possibility to continue a normal life
ppl don't know what mean to wear a uniform and carry a gun
As they say "an armed society is a polite society". And it's true. I have found myself more calm when carrying, by legal necessity. No more responding the crude remark, no more extending the middle finger. Now, if the other guy knew I was carrying, I have no doubt he would do the same.
Now, I don't wear a uniform or badge, but I carry a gun. And I have another saying for that - "when seconds count, the police are there in minutes". Once the police arrive, you let them take over, that's what they get payed for. But until then, when under a deadly attack, you are on your own. Survival is totally dependent on your actions. That is one fact no one can argue with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.