Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't believe people should have the right to anything beyond a pistol or rifle. I realize the "horse is out of the barn", and there are too many guns in the hands of criminals as well as nut cases. It's just my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
Okay, you shared your opinion and you are free to do that. But you didn't answer the question. I'll ask again, how do you define an assault weapon.
I don't believe people should have the right to anything beyond a pistol or rifle. I realize the "horse is out of the barn", and there are too many guns in the hands of criminals as well as nut cases. It's just my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
Then concentrate your efforts to control the criminals and nut cases - they don't have anything to do with the law-abiding citizens' rights.
I don't believe people should have the right to anything beyond a pistol or rifle. I realize the "horse is out of the barn", and there are too many guns in the hands of criminals as well as nut cases. It's just my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
how many firearm laws only effect the criminal? 1 or 2 and that is it. all the rest only effect the law abiding citizen as a means to control them. that means according to your analogy, all firearm laws should be repealed except for the 1 or 2 laws, that way only the criminals will be affected.
too bad we cant get the government to think that way.
I don't believe people should have the right to anything beyond a pistol or rifle. I realize the "horse is out of the barn", and there are too many guns in the hands of criminals as well as nut cases. It's just my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
So no shotguns then?
Not trying to insult anyone's intelligence, but you do realize that under Federal law there's really only three types of Title I firearms: pistols, rifles, and shotguns.
actually, a title II manufacturer CAN have quite a stock of arms, if he also has a class III dealer's license and possesses the (several dozen) full auto guns for the sake of comparison and demonstration (hopefully leading to sales of the ones that he makes). There are so many dealers now, that you can make great money just selling to other class III dealers.:-)
Personally, I want nukes, and I want the option of a dead man switch on at least one of them. You cannot be soverign (ie, left alone by the bullies of this world) if you don't have nukes. Just ask Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and many other countries if that is not so.
actually, a title II manufacturer CAN have quite a stock of arms, if he also has a class III dealer's license and possesses the (several dozen) full auto guns for the sake of comparison and demonstration (hopefully leading to sales of the ones that he makes). There are so many dealers now, that you can make great money just selling to other class III dealers.:-)
An 07 manufacturer would have a class 2 SOT, and a class 3 is not required.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
