Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, I like how this poll turned out.
Almost 70% said "anything you want". At least there is some hope.
Looking at exactly how people voted, I was not surprised at the results so far. Location location location. Those that voted for hunting rifles and shotguns only, were from areas that are fairly safe and yet heavily populated. Lots of suburb area, kind of rural. I was, however, really surprised at some of the middle ground votes that came from the Western States with very low population and yet a high percentage of gun owners and hunters. But, it's each individuals right to choose what they feel is right for their life. You didn't ask what people felt the nation should do as a whole, but more what an individual felt was right. It's turned out a real good discussion so far and is an outstanding poll.
Looking at exactly how people voted, I was not surprised at the results so far. Location location location. Those that voted for hunting rifles and shotguns only, were from areas that are fairly safe and yet heavily populated. Lots of suburb area, kind of rural. I was, however, really surprised at some of the middle ground votes that came from the Western States with very low population and yet a high percentage of gun owners and hunters. But, it's each individuals right to choose what they feel is right for their life. You didn't ask what people felt the nation should do as a whole, but more what an individual felt was right. It's turned out a real good discussion so far and is an outstanding poll.
I do wish that people would remember that the 2nd Amendment has nothing at all to do with sporting uses such as hunting, duck hunting or clay shooting. bur more if helping the civilian populace with keeping their goverment on the straight and narrow.
maybe if they understood this, then they would get tired of all the laws that keep the law abiding citizen from owning what they want for firearms.
very true, raufuss rounds tend to do that. not only would it destroy the nengine, but more than likely go through the entire vehicle.
Absolutely. Kicks like a mule, and the muzzle flash is nasty, (and wear both earplugs and earmuffs) but it does what is was designed to do. (Don't have anything on the bench, as it will go flying )
At 100 yards, it is like fish in a barrel. Woo Hoo!
This looks like a tough crowd. Why would anyone need anything more than a handgun or a hunting rifle?
Because I *CAN*.
Why would anyone need anything more than the same car as the neighbor?
Why would anyone need any other house than the same house their neighbor has.
Why would anyone need a different television than the neighbor.
A different stove, fridge, flavor of coffee, shirt, shoes, or even dinner?
Easy to answer.....
Because we *CAN*
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
