Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A California woman who underwent a double mastectomy and later discovered she didn't have breast cancer will be paid $198,000 after winning a medical malpractice lawsuit. Ana Jimenez-Salgado had her breasts surgically removed at a Los Angeles county hospital after outside pathologists said the cells obtained from an August 2007 biopsy were cancerous.
Number one..............she did not get near enough money.
Number two.............what is the normal protocol when diagnosing cancer? Does one lab person look at the cells and make that decision? Two? Three?
Shouldn't different samples of the cells being examined be prepared and viewed by several different specialists before such a life changing diagnosis is handed down? Maybe at least two seperate labs should be used before a diagnosis is made?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.