Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-29-2007, 12:35 PM
 
Location: My heart is in Wyoming, my body is soon to follow.....
745 posts, read 4,066,949 times
Reputation: 333

Advertisements

Quote:
I also don't want any pain meds. I would be terrified to have a giant needle stuck in my spine...
Uh-huh, get back to us after you've felt contractions! You sound just like me before I had experienced it. A needle in the back is not so terrifying when you're having contractions for 90 seconds with a 30 second break in between, lol. BTW, I was only dialated to a 4 at that point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2007, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Eastern PA
1,263 posts, read 4,939,788 times
Reputation: 1177
I've evolved in my birthing preferences. I had my first son in the hospital, with drugs and all kinds of stupid interventions. He was so sleepy after birth and it was nightmare getting him to latch on.

For son #2, I had an unmedicated hospital birth and refused all unnecessary interventions there (which was a pain). I wish I had known and researched homebirth because there was no reason for us to be at the hospital.

For my daughter (#3), we had a wonderful homebirth with a very experienced midwife. Part of the safety concerns about homebirth can easily be put aside when you are dealing with an experienced practitioner who is well aware of when transfer is indicated and does so properly. My midwife had oxygen and Pitocin with her and my DH is a paramedic with NALS, so I felt more than safe at home. As it stood, my labor ended up so fast that going to the hospital would have most likely been futile.

For those who love their epidurals, I must admit I did too with my first son when my natural coping techniques did not work. Unfortunately, I had a wound healing problem at the insertion site and long-standing back pain there as well. I will not have an epidural again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2007, 12:10 AM
 
Location: in drifts of snow wherever you go
2,493 posts, read 4,402,344 times
Reputation: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by happeemommee View Post
I was just curious on the opinion of others on this subject. I've had five daughters, three at home, two in the hospital. Four with no pain meds. My homebirths were planed and a midwife attended.
I don't have any children, but I always imagined that if I did have one, I would do whatever possible to have them naturally without pain meds, just squat and push. How did you make it without the pain meds? Do you think more women should tough it out that way?

Greenie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2007, 09:32 AM
 
19 posts, read 80,021 times
Reputation: 15
AS a Labor and Delivery nurse for over 22 years, I have seen alot..............I've worked in Newark, Edison, New Brunswick, Northern NJ, Scranton and Easton PA. While I respect and support the parents who advocate a natural unmedicated birth, a homebirth is risky business. There are many factors/situations that can happen in a blink that require immediate attention. Ruptured membranes that are bloodstained/meconium stained, shoulder dystocia, a placental abruption, a cord prolapse, many events that can occur and need stat attention for a live, well baby. No medications are fine, but consider these potential circumstances, as well as the baby once born that may need some immediate interventions not found in a home. After 5 minutes of limited oxygen, brain damage/ cerebral palsy can happen. I have four children myself, the first three I used pain medication, the last, none. Two of the births required immediate delivery interventions. What happens if you begin to hemorrhage and the baby needs assistance as well? Hospitals are there to handle the unforseen, and with you and a precious baby, why tempt fate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2007, 02:00 PM
 
436 posts, read 810,356 times
Reputation: 133
Exactly.

Unfortunately, all too many people believe in the "natural is safe" theory for everything, form deliveries to drugs.

Bad things can happen to anyone at any time. But, why tempt fate?

Deliver in a hospital where the skills, emergency equipment and resources are available to handle the emergency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2007, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
11 posts, read 35,750 times
Reputation: 11
I had five children, one in a birthing center, the next one at home and the next three in the hospital. I prefer giving birth at home in my comfortable surroundings without distractions. In the hospital the nurses kept coming in and out, insisting on checking me during contractions, desperately wanting to put a monitor on me, offering me drugs. My husband had to tell them to leave us alone. HOWEVER, it is a safer place to have a baby. My son who was delivered at home had shoulder dystocia. He was 10 pounds 4 ounces at birth but no one was able to tell that I was carrying a large baby - even though I was only 135 pounds at delivery. We panicked a bit as he got stuck and his face started turning blue. Thank God we were able to get him out before anything more serious happened, however, he did have a broken collar bone and a large hemotoma on his head. So, have your children in the hospital, just in case, but let your doctors and nurses know that you want to be left alone and not offered any drugs. After my last birth of a 9 pound 14 ounce boy, one of nurses said to me, "your delivery was so calm and peaceful. You make me want to have another baby!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2007, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Missouri Ozarks
7,395 posts, read 19,345,786 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by happeemommee View Post
I was just curious on the opinion of others on this subject. I've had five daughters, three at home, two in the hospital. Four with no pain meds. My homebirths were planed and a midwife attended.
I think having a baby at home with a midwife is the way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2007, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenMachine View Post
I don't have any children, but I always imagined that if I did have one, I would do whatever possible to have them naturally without pain meds, just squat and push. How did you make it without the pain meds? Do you think more women should tough it out that way?

Greenie
"In sorrow thou shall bring forth children" Genesis 3:16. God supposedly said this to Eve after she ate the apple. It went through my head when I was in labor with my first child. No, I do not think women should tough it out unnecessarily. It is better for the baby if the mom has little or no pain med, but no one should have to bear extreme pain. The meds will clear out of the baby's system quickly. It's not always a matter of "just squat and push". It depends on the size of the baby's head and the size of the mother's pelvis. MY first baby was small, and she had a relatively small head. The second one was larger, with a larger head. I had no pain med with the first, and two shots with the second.

Last edited by Katarina Witt; 10-20-2007 at 04:26 PM.. Reason: spelling error
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2007, 10:38 PM
 
4 posts, read 6,593 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padgett2 View Post
And if your baby is one of those that needs oxygen right after birth? Suppose you start to bleed uncontrollably? Or the placenta does come out like it's supposed to?

How's the traffic between your house and the hospital? How long will it take to get you or the baby there if you need help?

Many babies are successfully born at home. It can be done with no problem. You simply have to be sure that you want to take the risk that something may go wrong and your baby may not make it.

It boils down to whether or not you can handle feeling guilty about it.
CPMs carry oxygen and are certified in neonatal resus.

They carry herbs and pitocin and methergine for bleeding, are trained in physical ways to stop a flow, can scrub down and go in after a placenta if it is critical to get it out.

Usually that isn't needed. A retained placenta isn't a dire emergency. We watch for signs and symptoms of hidden bleeding, and, as I said before, react. But it is mostly watchful waiting, and if the placenta isn't detaching then we transport, calmly.

Something may go wrong, yes. The statistics indicate that for low risk women something may go wrong equally in a hospital setting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2007, 08:16 AM
 
436 posts, read 810,356 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by songinthewind7 View Post
I think having a baby at home with a midwife is the way to go.
Sure- if every goes well. BUT- if it doesn't, you are risking the wll being of your infant. Midwives cannot treat every thing which may happen, and there are a lot of things which can go wrong during the delivery process.

Why not be safer and have the infant in a hospital, with the obstetrician available and resources for adversity in place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top