U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2013, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,377 posts, read 53,415,985 times
Reputation: 21977

Advertisements

WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 (UPI) -- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration warns doctors of the rare but serious risk of heart attack and death with use of the cardiac nuclear stress test agents.

The cardiac nuclear stress test agents Lexiscan, or regadenoson, and Adenoscan, or adenosine, are FDA approved for use during cardiac stress tests in patients who cannot exercise adequately.

Read more: FDA warns of cardiac nuclear stress test agents Lexiscan and Adenoscan - UPI.com
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2013, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Greater Greenville, SC
5,893 posts, read 12,407,493 times
Reputation: 10690
Glad I had my nuclear stress test last year before this news came out. I would have been even more terrified!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2013, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,856 posts, read 63,438,458 times
Reputation: 19346
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotogGal View Post
Glad I had my nuclear stress test last year before this news came out. I would have been even more terrified!
Yeah, me, too!
__________________
Moderator for Utah, Salt Lake City, Diabetes, Cancer, Pets forums
//www.city-data.com/forumtos.html

Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 04:25 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,002 posts, read 24,610,579 times
Reputation: 27592
Of course this had to be posted the morning of the day my husband got scheduled for one.
I mentioned it, sort of jokingly, to the doctor. He just gave me this look

Did check the info sheet and see that it won't be with one of those chemicals
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 11:07 AM
 
4,885 posts, read 5,840,778 times
Reputation: 7420
My doctor wanted me to have a nuclear stress test but I told him, no - I will do the regular test. He said ok, and when I
went to schedule it, there it was again "nuclear stress test." I said no again and it was changed. btw, the cost of a nuclear
stress test can be between 5-7 thousand dollars while the one without the dye costs $2000.00.
I will not have any nuclear dye injected again. Many years ago I had one done for my thyroid (wasn't thinking - could have
had an ultra sound) and 14 years later I got thyroid cancer (and I know it was because of that test and my endocrinologist
also agreed).
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2013, 04:24 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,002 posts, read 24,610,579 times
Reputation: 27592
Quote:
Originally Posted by baileyvpotter View Post
My doctor wanted me to have a nuclear stress test but I told him, no - I will do the regular test. He said ok, and when I
went to schedule it, there it was again "nuclear stress test." I said no again and it was changed. btw, the cost of a nuclear
stress test can be between 5-7 thousand dollars while the one without the dye costs $2000.00.
I will not have any nuclear dye injected again. Many years ago I had one done for my thyroid (wasn't thinking - could have
had an ultra sound) and 14 years later I got thyroid cancer (and I know it was because of that test and my endocrinologist
also agreed).
Not saying this to argue with you but for suggestible people that might read and be influenced by your post.
It sounds as though you already had some thyroid associated problem 14 years ago or there would have been no need for the test.
I would say that over a 14 year period there could have been many things to contribute to the advent of cancer .
I'll also bet no doctor would ever have said definitively that the test caused the cancer....maybe agreed that it could have ...but any doctor worth his/her salt would never state what can't be proven
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2013, 07:06 AM
 
4,885 posts, read 5,840,778 times
Reputation: 7420
The doctor was a noted endocrinologist in a major city and there was no other factor that contributed to it other than
the radioactive iodine test.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top