Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why then does both France & Spain (2 major wine drinking countries, have the 2nd & 3rd least strokes behind only Switzerland in 1st place for lowest amount of strokes?) I'm lost here & the study which came out last wk from U. of E. Finland, I think, shows a 3-fold increase in drinkers (of any type booze) having ANY amount of alcohol -- on MORE than just 2 days/wk total.
Thus, it really said "2.5 days/wk of drinking increases stroke by 3-fold". This flies in the face of tons of studies refuting this including those of the French Paradox to lower cardiovascular risks, via 2 drinks wine per day, etc. I think questionnaires like the, "More than a few eggs per wk causes/ups Diabetes", that came out a few yrs ago have so much margin error as folks under/over-estimate intakes, etc.
Plus some smoke or are obese, eat wrong, don't exercise, etc. The variables can't be eval'd well on a self-filled out sheet of questions. But I'm only trying to make sense & see how valid this is, as obviously it warrants/needs further evals to qualify/quantify it.
It now seems not only volume, such as binging, but frequency of ANY (even a small glass of vino??) adds to this risk -- if done more than 2.5 days TOTAL in 7 day period. Anyone care to comment?
Hasn't anyone thought of this study as a concern, or dismissed it due to confounding variables? I'm sure someone here has some opinion re: this, no? Thanks as I'm trying to ascertain this, yet have no one willing to help analyze/discuss.
Are there any physicians on here that have any scientific rationale/basis to form a cogent argument one way or another? My older roommate seems to think this has zero merit but I'm not as quick to dismiss, as I enjoy (actually, love -- too much ) my nightly vino -- yet am perplexed as to where/how to proceed from here.
I'm stalled between a belief, "where there's smoke there's fire," but equally as torn as this is maybe simply carte' blanche bogus -- & to be disregarded -- til further studies advise/backup this obviously somewhat erroneus study that seems to have very weak protocol setup & thus very questionable results.
Ok, now that I've made a solilouqy out of this topic please bear w/ me & accept my apologies, but I do want some closure on the validity or invalidity of this supposed "scientific-based" study.
I don't know - on the one hand, I'm sitting here with my glass of vino wondering whether I should finish it or NOT - and, on the other hand, sometimes a 'study' shows one thing - we all panic and act accordingly, then later, alas, it's all for not - due to yet another study.
Ok, so I'll have a little more vino while I await your link to the study.
Although its supposedly any type of booze, middle-aged men in Eastern Finland are much more likely to be consuming beer and vodka than wine so I think that might have something to do with it considering wine's beneficial properties.
Although its supposedly any type of booze, middle-aged men in Eastern Finland are much more likely to be consuming beer and vodka than wine so I think that might have something to do with it considering wine's beneficial properties.
Hey I'll go along w/ that!
I ONLY drink red wine -- daily though -- but still I guess better than beer or hard stuff like vodka, whiskey, etc.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.