Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2014, 06:04 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,208,157 times
Reputation: 10894

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bg7 View Post
Well duh.

A vaccine primes your own immune system against the flu - by presenting it with flu antigens. The immune system reacts.
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.

 
Old 11-06-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,855 posts, read 65,818,191 times
Reputation: 19378
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.
No, not everyone gets that reaction. I had no trouble this year.
 
Old 11-06-2014, 08:05 PM
 
Location: NYPD"s 30th Precinct
2,565 posts, read 5,513,836 times
Reputation: 2691
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.
There's a chance you might get some mild cold like symptoms for a day or two. Some sneezing, a little congestion, you'll live. For what it's worth, I had my shot about three weeks ago and never had a single side effect.

Your being inoculated with a dead virus, so it's impossible to actually catch the flu from it..
 
Old 11-06-2014, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,945 posts, read 12,282,765 times
Reputation: 16109
No strong opinion either way here. I happen to be at work when they were giving them away free so I got one... still doing fine. No flulike symptoms... a sore spot around the injection site for a day.
 
Old 11-07-2014, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,250,908 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kefir King View Post
No doubt about it.
Even polio before Salk and Sabin: 90 to 95% of the people contracted polio and had no symptoms but developed antibodies and immunity. They never knew they had the disease.

Here's the dilly for those who want to muse:
A large study was done on families who had not been affected by Plague in the 13th and 14th centuries. It was done by examination of old European census and cemetery records. Some families were found to be nearly immune to it. Scroll on centuries and it was found that these same families showed a remarkable resistance to the H1N1 Spanish Flu of 1918-1919, the biggest killer in history (100 Million dead.)
Now hold onto your hats...the same European family lines seem to be unable to contract HIV.

If someone can connect these dots with cause and effect there's got to be a Nobel Prize in it for him.
There is a proposed genetic mechanism for the resistance to plague and HIV:

The Evolving Genetics of HIV | Understanding Genetics

"Many people who are resistant to HIV have a mutation in the CCR5 gene called CCR5-delta32. The CCR5-delta32 mutation results in a smaller protein that isn't on the outside of the cell anymore. Most forms of HIV cannot infect cells if there is no CCR5 on the surface.

People with two copies of the CCR5 delta32 gene (inherited from both parents) are virtually immune to HIV infection. This occurs in about 1% of Caucasian people."

Understanding Genetics

"For example, in 1665, the plague hit a small village in England called Eyam. The town quarantined itself to keep the Black Death from spreading into the rest of the country. A year later, the plague had burnt itself out but half of the townspeople were dead. Was there something special about the half that lived?

In 1996, researchers tracked down descendants of the people of Eyam and looked for any mutations they might have in common to explain this high survival rate. What they found was a mutation called CCR5-delta 32."

The genetic basis of resistance to influenza is an area of study, but specific genes have not yet been identified. Do you have a link to the information you posted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.
Feeling slightly achy and feverish for a day or two is not the same as having full blown influenza. For most people, the worst thing the flu vaccine does is give you a sore arm for a short time, so having flu-like symptoms is not a certainty.
 
Old 11-07-2014, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,250,908 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebbe View Post
I don't know why systemic flu shot reactions are pretty much ignored except by those who have them.
They are not ignored. They are just not usually severe and are certainly not comparable to being laid up in bed for two weeks.
 
Old 11-07-2014, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,250,908 times
Reputation: 45135
Regarding Gardasil:

Vaccines: VPD-VAC/HPV/Vaccine FAQ

The vaccine is safe, with no proven serious side effects. There is already a demonstrable significant decrease in HPV infections since the HPV vaccines were introduced.

CDC Online Newsroom | Press Release | New study shows HPV vaccine helping lower HPV infection rates in teen girls

HPV Vaccine Program in Australia Linked to Lower Infection Rates
 
Old 11-07-2014, 11:07 PM
 
5,644 posts, read 13,225,081 times
Reputation: 14170
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.
Certainty of flu like symptoms from a flu vaccine. This sounds to me like someone who hasn't a clue what they are talking about.
 
Old 11-07-2014, 11:18 PM
 
5,644 posts, read 13,225,081 times
Reputation: 14170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo48 View Post
You very own immune system can do the same thing. Take chicken pox. I was exposed to chicken pox when my kids, and kids around them, had it. Since I had had chicken pox myself, my OWN immune system kicked in so I did not get it again. Same for Measles, and probably the same being exposed to the flu, including different strains, over DECADES.

I will try to find a link on a story. A woman wrote and asked why she came down with the flu (no flu shot) and her 84 year old mother (no flu shot) did not when they both were on a plane together. This was on a medical site. The answer was that probably because her mother had lived longer than she and had been exposed to that flu strain and had her own antibodies to it. Dr. Jenny????? lol

Do you think the ONLY way for your body to create antibodies is from vaccines? It just applies to measles, mumps, chicken pox, and not the flu? If that is true, how did the human race ever survive the flu pandemic of 1918 when there weren't vax for it?

Oh, I forgot. It could be ME who dies from it. That is how big PHARM makes $$$$$$.
Well you win the prize for the most idiotic response on a vaccine thread....

First off, the whole point of vaccines is to avoid "catching" diseases like measles in the first place. Of course your immune system provides immunity to the disease after catching it, but it is better to be vaccinated and attain immunity without having to go through the disease

The airplane story is also beyond ridiculous, lots of factors in play as to who "catches" a disease even in a closed space like an airplane....not EVERYONE on a plane will catch the flu if exposed. Bottom line, the daughter should have been vaccinated...

Lastly, the 1918 Flu Pandemic??? Between 30 and 50 million people died, and THAT is part of your ANTI VACCINE rant????

Do you think maybe a FEW less would have died had there been a vaccine????
 
Old 11-08-2014, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,069,384 times
Reputation: 12769
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So I trade a 62% reduced chance of getting the flu, for a certainty of flu-like symptoms. This sounds to me like a lousy deal.
And that 62% reduction is only in the BEST of years. It is never better and very often much, MUCH worse.
An this is not MY opinion, it is CDC data collected and announced after the flu season has ended.


I will go out on a limb and make a prediction. Based on the antigen drift in the Far East, I will predict no better than 25% protection for 2014-2015. Let's see how close I get.

Here's some fun reading:
http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gov...h-settlements/
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top