Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-20-2020, 05:08 PM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,237 posts, read 5,114,062 times
Reputation: 17722

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
Claims made in (b) and (c) are obviously in conflict in each other and patently wrong. States with more restrictive enforcement had herd immunity since you claim they caused higher infection rates. Therefore, infection rates should be declining more in the 'Draconian' states, not the lax states.

You're just making claims and not providing anything to back it up.

.
I provided the link to the CDC data earlier.

Your analysis of the situation is exactly backwards: states that had the most restrictive regs early on are now seeing a more robust "second wave," while the states that opened up early are not showing second waves but a flattening out of new infections at lower rates...That suggests that (a) the regs only delayed new infections and (b) that masks/social distancing/sequestration isn't nearly as effective as they hoped it would be

Another way of looking at it: MVA death rate is 1 in 10,000 per yr...We all accept that and use our cars without hesitation...Anyone who has too much anxiety over the risk of an auto death and refuses to get in a car is probably under the care of a psychiatrist (or should be if he isn't).....Yet we have "experts" proclaiming that 1 in 330,000 is unacceptably high and drastic measures should be instituted to reduce that risk.

??? No meds for them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2020, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,096 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Fatal crashed were actually up during the lockdown.
up. https://ohsonline.com/articles/2020/...vid19.aspx?m=2
"Crashes" and "rates" are different metrics, as I pointed out in my post that you quoted. Total crashes are down, fatalities based on miles driven (rate) is up due to crashes being more severe when they do happen, largely because of speeding.

I have gotten two rebates on auto insurance premiums in the last six months because my insurer's losses are down.

Quote:
Homicide is also way up during the lockdown/restrictions
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/u...ronavirus.html
Is that behavior due to COVID-19 or the civil unrest and rioting?

Quote:
Deaths from heart attacks, stroke and diabetes are also on the rise, not because of covid but due to the lockdown/restrictions.
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2020/0...-from-covid-19
As I said before, some of those heart and stroke deaths are probably from undiagnosed COVID-19. People can have a heart attack or stroke due to the abnormal clotting caused by the virus.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2009787

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2767649

The diabetic deaths, if truly due only to uncontrolled diabetes, imply lack of care, either due to reluctance to go to the hospital or inability to do so for some reason. People need to understand that they should not delay emergent or urgent care due to fear of COVID-19.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:09 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,730,981 times
Reputation: 19118
[quote=suzy_q2010;59210609]
Quote:

"Crashes" and "rates" are different metrics, as I pointed out in my post that you quoted. Total crashes are down, fatalities based on miles driven (rate) is up due to crashes being more severe when they do happen, largely because of speeding.

I have gotten two rebates on auto insurance premiums in the last six months because my insurer's losses are down.



Is that behavior due to COVID-19 or the civil unrest and rioting?



As I said before, some of those heart and stroke deaths are probably from undiagnosed COVID-19. People can have a heart attack or stroke due to the abnormal clotting caused by the virus.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2009787

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2767649

The diabetic deaths, if truly due only to uncontrolled diabetes, imply lack of care, either due to reluctance to go to the hospital or inability to do so for some reason. People need to understand that they should not delay emergent or urgent care due to fear of COVID-19.

I would say civil unrest is clearly related to the lockdown/restrictions so I would also infer the the homicide rate is as well.

What you are saying about heart attacks, strokes and diabetes is not what the experts are saying about the rise.

It’s good to know that indoor dining is higher risk so people who are higher risk can use that info to make decisions about what they would like to do but it’s also important to factor in the fact that restaurant will fold without customers so people who want to take the risk can still support them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Inside the 101
2,784 posts, read 7,443,931 times
Reputation: 3275
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
Then adaptations already needed to be made to reduce the effects on the bike lanes, sidewalks, and bus stops.

Issue tickets for blocking bike lanes and sidewalks. Relocate bus stops.

One burger and BBQ place (which normally also has indoor seating) here added a walkup window. You can park and place an order at the window if the drive through lane is full.
Those are expensive band-aids for the symptoms. To address the underlying cause, there should be fewer drive-thrus creating a hostile environment for the most vulnerable street users. Instead, we're using the pandemic as an excuse to create more of them. Major fast food chains have started out rolling new store design prototypes that have multiple drive-thru lanes and reduced indoor occupancy. When we think of the private car not merely as transportation but instead as the ultimate family-sized personal protective equipment, that's a clear sign that we've lost all perspective about the broader concept of public health in our zeal to protect ourselves from the perceived risks of the virus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,096 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post

I would say civil unrest is clearly related to the lockdown/restrictions so I would also infer the the homicide rate is as well.

What you are saying about heart attacks, strokes and diabetes is not what the experts are saying about the rise.

It’s good to know that indoor dining is higher risk so people who are higher risk can use that info to make decisions about what they would like to do but it’s also important to factor in the fact that restaurant will fold without customers so people who want to take the risk can still support them.
By civil unrest I was referring to the BLM mess and should have made that clearer. The homicides I have seen reported seem to be of that ilk.

I gave links about the heart attacks and strokes due to COVID-19. Those were written by experts. There are articles from Italy and France about it, too.

DH and I are not eating in, but we are getting curbside delivery from local restaurants and tipping well.

Our forty ninth anniversary dinner yesterday was take-out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,096 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
Those are expensive band-aids for the symptoms. To address the underlying cause, there should be fewer drive-thrus creating a hostile environment for the most vulnerable street users. Instead, we're using the pandemic as an excuse to create more of them. Major fast food chains have started out rolling new store design prototypes that have multiple drive-thru lanes and reduced indoor occupancy. When we think of the private car not merely as transportation but instead as the ultimate family-sized personal protective equipment, that's a clear sign that we've lost all perspective about the broader concept of public health in our zeal to protect ourselves from the perceived risks of the virus.
This thread is about the risks of indoor dining, so those drive throughs are not going away any time soon. It seems to me that you are blaming COVID-19 for pre-existing traffic problems as you perceive them.

The multiple drive through lanes predate COVID-19. They were a response to the desire to get people through the line more quickly.

Chick-fil-A bulldozed a restaurant here and built a new one, with a larger dining area and double drive through lanes. Employees come to your car and take your order and payment on a tablet computer. It is fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 08:27 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,730,981 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
By civil unrest I was referring to the BLM mess and should have made that clearer. The homicides I have seen reported seem to be of that ilk.

I gave links about the heart attacks and strokes due to COVID-19. Those were written by experts. There are articles from Italy and France about it, too.

DH and I are not eating in, but we are getting curbside delivery from local restaurants and tipping well.

Our forty ninth anniversary dinner yesterday was take-out.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the protests and riots started when the lockdown did and continue to this day. I think it’s obvious they are closely related. Homicides are up in general. Getting takeout is a nice way to support restaurants and a good option for anyone who does not feel it’s safe or who is high risk but it doesn’t keep the businesses fully staffed by any means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,096 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the protests and riots started when the lockdown did and continue to this day. I think it’s obvious they are closely related. Homicides are up in general. Getting takeout is a nice way to support restaurants and a good option for anyone who does not feel it’s safe or who is high risk but it doesn’t keep the businesses fully staffed by any means.
The vast majority of protests and riots associated with lethal violence are linked to BLM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2020, 08:49 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,730,981 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The vast majority of protests and riots associated with lethal violence are linked to BLM.
Right but the homicide rate going up is mostly related to other acts of violence totally unrelated to the protests/riots. A lot of people are on edge and it shows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2020, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Inside the 101
2,784 posts, read 7,443,931 times
Reputation: 3275
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
This thread is about the risks of indoor dining, so those drive throughs are not going away any time soon. It seems to me that you are blaming COVID-19 for pre-existing traffic problems as you perceive them.

The multiple drive through lanes predate COVID-19. They were a response to the desire to get people through the line more quickly.

Chick-fil-A bulldozed a restaurant here and built a new one, with a larger dining area and double drive through lanes. Employees come to your car and take your order and payment on a tablet computer. It is fast.
Yes, this thread started with a study about indoor dining, but, then as these threads do, it wandered into other territory. I'll leave it to a moderator to determine when that drift has been gone too far. Putting aside the blight of drive-thru restaurants, it is troubling to see how many events are being converted to a drive-thru operations without consideration of how they may exclude those relying on other means of transport and how they may promote a net negative effect on public health.

I've just learned that my local state fair, which has been cancelled, is now going to have a drive-thru event to allow people to purchase deep-fried fair food. The marketing language talks about "the safety of your own car," when in fact a car is the most dangerous place most people occupy on any given day. Of course, this is minor compared to the problem of so many virus testing operations being drive-thru only. The car-as-PPE mentality is the ultimate in myopic thinking about this pandemic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top