Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Cost aside, anyone know if either is better, or about the same? My tap water appears to be not that bad at all, but I have not had it tested. Even if it is classified as "very good" by any test, I still want to keep going with filtration. Can only help. Thoughts?
What do you mean by "best"? If you don't know what's in your tapwater you can't really select a filter that is even capable of removing whatever is there. Some are better at removing particulates of differing sizes and types than others. If it was me, I'd get the water tested. Find out what impurities/particulates are even there and at what concentration. Then select a filter based on how well it will remove the ones you are most concerned about. You can spend a lot of $ trying to remove impurities that aren't even present. Plus, there's no reason to remove everything that isn't H2O. FWIW, if you do a forum search you'll find a very recent thread about a very similar topic.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
