U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2010, 10:44 PM
 
29,984 posts, read 42,336,583 times
Reputation: 12824

Advertisements

After 22 years of rigorous research and 10 grueling expeditions, we can say that all of the evidence we have found on Nikumaroro is consistent with the hypothesis that Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan landed and eventually died there as castaways (http://news.discovery.com/history/amelia-earhart-island-artifacts.html - broken link)," Gillespie said. Indeed, a number of artifacts unearthed on the uninhabited island provide strong circumstantial evidence for a castaway presence.

http://news.discovery.com/history/am...ne-101210.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2010, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,660 posts, read 85,363,091 times
Reputation: 36620
I place very little stock in anything I see on the Discovery/Science/History channel. It is heavily hyped toward the speculative. I used to try to verify some of the "facts" that they purport to represent, with such a high failure rate that I don't even bother anymore. The Earhart feature even ends with an admission that nothing conclusive was found, and piques the viewers interest with a diatribe of how spirit-sappingly difficult it is to continue to do the research.

The Mayan "Apocalypse Island" feature was outrageous. There is actually a permanent population living on the island, with an airstrip, and more than half the program was about the phony danger of landing a boat on the shore of the island, just in the nick of time to avoid seasonal storms. And then all they did was stand on the rock and say "I can see the sun from here". Jim Turner, the featured Canadian explorer, later said in his blog that after he had signed the contract, he was compelled to participate in a hokey staged "adventure" which had little relation to the actual work or research he was doing there, and served no other purpose but to sensationalize according to the producer's script.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2010, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,565 posts, read 23,521,484 times
Reputation: 21188
The DNA testing should resolve the merits of the claims. I recall some years back when there was a forensic anthropologist named Clyde Snow who claimed he had found the graves of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid in Bolivia. The supporting circumstantial evidence was much akin to that which is being offered in this case...possibilities, but nothing close to conclusive, nor anything that could have no other possible explanation.

In the case of the Bandidos Yanquis, they dug up the grave Snow identified, took DNA samples from the remains found within, and compared them to DNA samples from living descendants of Harry Longabaugh, the Sundance Kid. All this was made into a documentary which I saw on one of those Discovery style channels, I forget which. They held back the DNA results until the end, understandable since there turned out to be no match between the corpse and the descendant.

Speculation here is relatively pointless in that the means for scientific resolution is at hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:50 PM
 
146 posts, read 395,019 times
Reputation: 174
The problem is that the mitochondria may have completely deteriorated on the bones that were found, making impossible any sampling of DNA.

There is a 99.5% chance that the bones found are that of Mrs Earhart though, the evidence is very strong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 10:04 AM
 
Location: FROM Dixie, but IN SoCal
3,485 posts, read 6,402,105 times
Reputation: 3780
It would be good to finally achieve closure on this issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,660 posts, read 85,363,091 times
Reputation: 36620
I keep wondering why it is taking so long. We either have the DNA evidence, or we don't.

B.C. scientist hopes to extract Amelia Earhart's DNA - CTV News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2011, 05:38 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,049 posts, read 34,097,748 times
Reputation: 10605
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Indeed, a number of artifacts unearthed on the uninhabited island provide strong circumstantial evidence for a castaway presence.
You'd think that artifacts might do a little better than circumstantial evidence. And they don't necessarily indicate that those castaways actually included Amelia Earhart. That's called jumping to conclusions. (At least the researcher wasn't named Von Daniken, or there would probably have been aliens from another planet involved!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2011, 10:41 AM
 
1,742 posts, read 6,012,627 times
Reputation: 737
So Jesse James, John Wilkes Booth, and Billy the Kid made it to Texas, Butch Cassidey and Sundance Kid made it to Bolivia, Hitler made it to South America, and now Amelia Earhart wound up on an island somewhere between the islands on Lost and Castaway? I bet Elvis and Andy Kaufman went to Cuba.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2011, 04:07 PM
 
76 posts, read 165,121 times
Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
You'd think that artifacts might do a little better than circumstantial evidence. And they don't necessarily indicate that those castaways actually included Amelia Earhart. That's called jumping to conclusions. (At least the researcher wasn't named Von Daniken, or there would probably have been aliens from another planet involved!)
Don't airplane crews keep logs the way ships do? Wouldn't a pilot, especially one who is attempting a historic flight, go out of their way to maintain their log even if the plane were lost? We can reasonably assume that Earhardt's plane was lost, likely at sea. But if she survived for any time at all, where is her log?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
3,726 posts, read 6,109,857 times
Reputation: 4251
Default Update.

New evidence, from previously dismissed radio signal analysis, indicates that Nikumaroro Island does indeed appear to be the final destination for Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan. TIGHAR believes that the pair perished on this atoll. It has been not quite 75 years since they vanished, and remains one of the leading unsolved mysteries.
www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/06/01/previously-dismissed-radio-signals-were-credible-transmissions-from-earhart/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top