Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2011, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Not where you ever lived
11,535 posts, read 30,265,438 times
Reputation: 6426

Advertisements

Which brings to my mind Gen. Stand Wattie. What happened to Richmond after the CSA was defeated, was it dismantled? If not, should it havd been and why? (I'm not a miliary guy, I"m curious.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2011, 09:23 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,691,956 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by linicx View Post
Which brings to my mind Gen. Stand Wattie. What happened to Richmond after the CSA was defeated, was it dismantled? If not, should it havd been and why? (I'm not a miliary guy, I"m curious.)
There wasn't much left to dismantle. In the closing stages of the war Jefferson Davis and pretty much everyone else in Richmond fled the city. Troops were ordered to burn the warehouses, armories and destroy the bridges and rail lines in and out of the city to prevent the Union from capturing them. The problem was that the fires burned uncontrolled and destroyed about 25% of the city, including the majority of warehouses and manufactury. When the Union occupied the city and reconstruction began, it took almost 20 years for the city to be restored to its pre-war height.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,490 posts, read 6,511,066 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
Originally Posted by linicx View Post
Which brings to my mind Gen. Stand Wattie. What happened to Richmond after the CSA was defeated, was it dismantled? If not, should it havd been and why? (I'm not a miliary guy, I"m curious.)
General Stand Wattie was of the Trans-Mississippi Confederacy (west of the Mississippi River). He commanded the Indian forces from the Nations, primarily the Cherokee. The fate of Richmond (Virginia), and that of General Stand Wattie (in what is now Oklahoma), were separated by a whole buncha miles...

Like the saying goes, I might have been born at night, but I wasn't born LAST NIGHT! (In more politically-correct terms, "Please rephrase your question...")

-- Nighteyes (Choctaw)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,530,289 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
General Stand Wattie was of the Trans-Mississippi Confederacy (west of the Mississippi River). He commanded the Indian forces from the Nations, primarily the Cherokee. The fate of Richmond (Virginia), and that of General Stand Wattie (in what is now Oklahoma), were separated by a whole buncha miles...

Like the saying goes, I might have been born at night, but I wasn't born LAST NIGHT! (In more politically-correct terms, "Please rephrase your question...")

-- Nighteyes (Choctaw)
I believe Watie was the last Confederate General to surrender, wasn't he?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2011, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,490 posts, read 6,511,066 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
I believe Watie was the last Confederate General to surrender, wasn't he?
Yup, he was. And your point would be...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2011, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,033,943 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
You might just want to re-consult that map of yours, my friend. The Tennessee River comes nowhere near Montgomery. The Alabama River does, but until the 1960's it was only navigable for a short distance above the Mobile River Delta.
You know what, you're right. I was thinking Montgomery was closer to where Birmingham is - my bad. Pretty sad for someone born in Alabama.

But in the same way Montgomery was difficult to approach, it was also difficult for the Confederates to reach and defend. Neither one of the railroads coming out of Montgomery was matching in gauge. Once the tracks reached Georgia, they changed gauge again. Plus, Alabama was still a desolate state, at least a third of it was undeveloped and still owned by the federal government in 1860.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
5. In addition to the port, Richmond was also the terminus point of 5 major railroads allowing people and products from throughout the CSA to easily move to and from Richmond. The other benefit of being a rail terminus was that telegraph lines at the time primarily ran along established rail corridors. This made Richmond a major communications hub as virtually all telegraph traffic to other southern cities was routed through Richmond.
And how many of those railroads made physical interchange at Richmond? Not a single one. Cargo had to be offloaded, moved through the city, and then reloaded onto another train. It was not exactly easy or efficient.

As for Charleston.. They were in a solid position in terms of railroads. The entire 5' gauge network of the Confederacy was linked to Charleston. South Carolina had the most developed rail network of any southern state. All of its major cities and industries were linked efficiently, and there were no breaks in gauge. There were direct links to Atlanta, Wilmington (the other Confederate port open the end of the war), and other smaller industry centers. Even Montgomery, Alabama was reachable with only one break of gauge.

Plus, Charleston was an open break in the Union blockade. Ships could essentially come and go unmolested. However, the city was pretty much leveled by Union artillery fire in 1864. What remained was destroyed by an earthquake in 1865. However, had Charleston served as capital, no doubt it would have been reinforced significantly with more effort to keep away federal forces.

But no matter what, Richmond and Virginia in general would have been held to the last man. As has been said, it was an invaluable industry center. Plus defending Virginia kept federal troops out of the Carolinas and Georgia, which were major sources of war material and supplies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2011, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,490 posts, read 6,511,066 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
You know what, you're right. I was thinking Montgomery was closer to where Birmingham is - my bad. Pretty sad for someone born in Alabama.
Aye, and ye must be at least part Irish. Ye've certainly been kissin' the Blarney Stone...

Considerin' the day and all it means, Erin go Bragh!

-- O' Nighteyes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:07 AM
 
3,734 posts, read 2,562,051 times
Reputation: 6789
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
Troops were ordered to burn the warehouses..
NJG, Great posts in this thread. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge.

I think most of the warehouses torched, housed tobacco (?) Confederates didn't want such a valuable commodity falling into hands of the Union army. Subsequently, a strong, sudden wind got ahold of the warehouse flames. For whatever it's worth, Richmond is Burning (Nelson Lankford), is a good read on the final days of Richmond as Confederate capital. Good pace, but still comprehensively covers the story.

Strangely, I don't think there was a single photo taken of Lincoln in the collapsing Confederate capital (?) There are a lot of shots of the burned buildings tho.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32940
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
I think if you look at what Richmond was at the time, the choice becomes pretty obvious. Virginia was the only true industrial center in the south and was easily the largest economic center in the CSA. Basically, it didn't matter if the capitol was in another city, without Richmond the CSA didn't stand a chance.

Some points to ponder:

1. Richmond and Virginia overall were the "whitest" of the CSA states. Richmond's old Whig dominated political society also embodied the ideals of the "Southern Gentleman" and southern culture. Richmond also had large white immigrant populations primarily Irish Catholics and Germans, many of whom had business contacts in Europe. Further, Virginia was the classical "home" of the Founding Fathers and the CSA identified itself with what they viewed as the original ideals of the country.

2. Richmond was one of the largest milling centers in the country producing over $3 million in annual revenues from its flour and meal mills. This made Richmond the only area in the CSA able to produce volume food to feed the army in the field without relying on extensive scavenging.

3. The Tredegar Iron Works was the second largest foundry in the country with dozens of facilities spread throughout Richmond. This iron works produced all of the iron and metal used by the CSA for everything from ships to machinery to muskets to cannons.

4. Richmond was a major port city with regular ship service to locations across the Atlantic seaboard as well as direct service to Europe. Richmond also contained the second largest slave market in the country, second to only New Orleans.

5. In addition to the port, Richmond was also the terminus point of 5 major railroads allowing people and products from throughout the CSA to easily move to and from Richmond. The other benefit of being a rail terminus was that telegraph lines at the time primarily ran along established rail corridors. This made Richmond a major communications hub as virtually all telegraph traffic to other southern cities was routed through Richmond.
You've got it.

Ironically, I was just reading about Tredegar Iron Works last night. As you said, one of the largest in country pre-Civil War, and the largest is the Confederacy during the Civil War. The owner of Tredegar held tremendous political power, as a result.

Additionally, the woolen factory next to Tredegar produced most of the uniforms for the Confederacy for much of the war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Willow Spring and Mocksville
275 posts, read 396,924 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post

....And how many of those railroads made physical interchange at Richmond? Not a single one. Cargo had to be offloaded, moved through the city, and then reloaded onto another train. It was not exactly easy or efficient.

As for Charleston.. They were in a solid position in terms of railroads. The entire 5' gauge network of the Confederacy was linked to Charleston. South Carolina had the most developed rail network of any southern state. All of its major cities and industries were linked efficiently, and there were no breaks in gauge. There were direct links to Atlanta, Wilmington (the other Confederate port open the end of the war), and other smaller industry centers. Even Montgomery, Alabama was reachable with only one break of gauge.

Plus, Charleston was an open break in the Union blockade. Ships could essentially come and go unmolested. However, the city was pretty much leveled by Union artillery fire in 1864. What remained was destroyed by an earthquake in 1865. However, had Charleston served as capital, no doubt it would have been reinforced significantly with more effort to keep away federal forces.

But no matter what, Richmond and Virginia in general would have been held to the last man. As has been said, it was an invaluable industry center. Plus defending Virginia kept federal troops out of the Carolinas and Georgia, which were major sources of war material and supplies.
Considering how the war actually progressed, Richmond seems to have been a better choice than Charleston! But the proximity of Richmond to Washington probably guaranteed that VA would be a major theater of war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top