Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2011, 08:06 AM
LLN LLN started this thread
 
Location: Upstairs closet
5,265 posts, read 10,723,610 times
Reputation: 7189

Advertisements

Is there any evidence that the US, in WWII, had its hands on any IL-2 Shturmoviks. If so, did we use them?

I am sure by American standards the IL-2 was primitive and hubris, being what it is, we would have looked down on it.

However, the more you learn about the eastern front, the greater the appreciation of the IL-2. Those guys killed a lot of panzers. Any ideas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Declezville, CA
16,806 posts, read 39,928,986 times
Reputation: 17694
I'll bet that armored shell protecting the crew didn't look so primitive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 02:21 AM
 
Location: SWUS
5,419 posts, read 9,193,173 times
Reputation: 5851
I'm not aware of the US having its hands on any, though I'm sure they probably had a good idea of what its capabilities were. Would have been interesting to see an IL2 and a P51D go at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 10:34 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,668,651 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by LLN View Post
Is there any evidence that the US, in WWII, had its hands on any IL-2 Shturmoviks. If so, did we use them?

I am sure by American standards the IL-2 was primitive and hubris, being what it is, we would have looked down on it.

However, the more you learn about the eastern front, the greater the appreciation of the IL-2. Those guys killed a lot of panzers. Any ideas?
There is no evidence of the US or any western ally having possession of an Il-2. However, they would certainly have been familiar with it. There are some pictures floating around from Operation Frantic that show US and Soviet aircrews swapping stories and talking about their planes. There are B17's, P51's, Yaks and Il-2's in the pictures, so it is obvious the US knew what they were and at least "kicked the tires" a couple times.

For those that don't know, Operation Frantic, was an American operation that conducted "shuttle bombing" over deep targets held by the Nazi's. The planes would take off from Britain or Italy, but would end their flights at Soviet airbases in the Ukraine. Three bases were established that supported B17's and B24's as well as long range escorts like P51's and P38's. The operation wasn't very succesful, but lasted from June 1944 to September 1944 with the last US crews and planes leaving the Ukraine in June 1945.

In terms of the Il-2, it certainly has gained a heck of a reputation given its contributions on the eastern front, but in practical terms, it wasn't as good as planes the western allies had for the same role like the P47 or Typhoon. The western planes were more accurate, carried a larger payload and were better air-to-air fighters. The advantage the Il-2 had was the fact that it was used in massive numbers. They also benefitted greatly from the development of anti-tank "cluster bombs" that allowed them to carpet an area with 192 bomblets, which more than made up for their lack of accuracy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fontucky View Post
I'll bet that armored shell protecting the crew didn't look so primitive.
It wasn't primitive, but the western planes like the P47 (designed by expatriate Russians who fled from the Bolsheviks) had similar protection, albeit not as rugged. The interesting piece with the Il-2 is that the armor body design was inspired by the German WW1 era Junkers J.1, which used similar constuction. The engine, while being a total Russian design, borrowed many elements from the BMW V1. The V1 was built under license as the Mikulin M-17, which became the M-34, then M-35 and finally the M-38 that was used in the Il-2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanJP View Post
I'm not aware of the US having its hands on any, though I'm sure they probably had a good idea of what its capabilities were. Would have been interesting to see an IL2 and a P51D go at it.
The fact of the matter is that the P51D would have ripped an Il-2 to shreds in air-to-air combat. The Il-2 was a good ground attack aircraft, especially in numbers, but it was pretty much a sitting duck in a dogfight. They scored the occasional BF109 kill, but over half of Il-2 losses were to enemy fighters, the remainder being losses to AA fire, especially once the AA crews realized that the Il-2's lack of accuracy meant they could stay in position and fire with little risk of being hit.

The German pilots referred to it as the "concrete bomber", since it could absorb so much punishment and was difficult to shoot down, but in air combat the Il-2 was really only a threat to heavy bombers and transport planes.

I think the Il-2 is an example of a weapon whose reputation exceeds its actual capabilities. Yes, it performed great in the role it was intended to fill and the Soviets adapted their tactics to make great use of it, but compared to other aircraft it wasn't all that fantastic. Contrast that with the Soviet T34 tank that deserves every bit of the reputation it earned during the war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Willow Spring and Mocksville
275 posts, read 396,667 times
Reputation: 482
[SIZE=2] I have seen a pic of an Il-10 that fell into US hands in Korea. It was used for testing and flew in US markings.
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 01:41 PM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,668,651 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strelnikov View Post
I have seen a pic of an Il-10 that fell into US hands in Korea. It was used for testing and flew in US markings.
You are correct. I can't find anything more online than conversation about it and a couple photos of the planes captured in Kimbo Korea, but it would seem the US captured 2 Il-10's in Korea and tested them. The one site stated that "the Americans found the planes to be excellent and stable fliers, but ultimately obsolete".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 05:28 PM
LLN LLN started this thread
 
Location: Upstairs closet
5,265 posts, read 10,723,610 times
Reputation: 7189
thanks for the impressive input.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top