Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2020, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,858 posts, read 2,169,936 times
Reputation: 3027

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
Well, for one thing, most of us don't like it when we send the kid out for a day at the local playground and he winds up getting eaten by a pride of lions.


There's in excess of 2 million species of flora/fauna in existence today that we know about. In the last 400 yrs, there have only been 200 species of large animals that have gone extinct, most of those not due to us. (So much for "The Sixth Great Extinction")


Just as it is the destiny of the individual to die, it is the destiny of species to go extinct. No use crying about it.


OTOH- the biggest influence humans have on the process is that of destroying habitat. Take the Indian Tiger-- it has been extirpated (local extinction) from large swaths of its former natural range on the Indian subcontinent and it's only a matter of time before there are too few left to continue successfully mating for population maintenance. It's not that hunters have murdered them, but that loss of habitat has limited their range & food supply.


There must be a balance between human needs and Mother Nature.


But who are we, whose forefathers have already eliminated wolves & bears from our neighborhoods and buffalo herds from our cropland so that we might live in safety, to tell the more primitive people of Africa & India that they can't do the same for themselves?


I may be smart enough to see the problem, but not wise enough to come up with the answer.
There are few species of megafauna to begin with, so 200 species represent a large chunk. I also question your definition of 'not due to us'. Habitat loss, climate change and introduction of exotic organisms count as human activity.

We all get that a balance need to be struck, but does humanity NEED to take everything? Commander's Island for example where Steller's Sea Cow once lived isn't even inhabited today. Whalers didn't need to stop there to hunt them - there were other food sources, but they chose to because by all accounts their meat taste better than seals. We aren't really better than those sailors as we do something similar in our lives today, like feeling we NEED to eat meat every day. I know that it's impossible for most people to think through every decision they make and it's probably not fair to, but I don't think there's any good excuse for not even managing low hanging fruits like saving giraffes/elephants and lowering ship speeds in whale or manatee habitats. There's also a number of projects in the works for mining the ocean which no one is talking about but will certainly push some of the marine habitats already stressed by overfishing to the breaking point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2020, 08:13 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,495,021 times
Reputation: 5031
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkwensky View Post
There are few species of megafauna to begin with, so 200 species represent a large chunk. I also question your definition of 'not due to us'. Habitat loss, climate change and introduction of exotic organisms count as human activity.

We all get that a balance need to be struck, but does humanity NEED to take everything? Commander's Island for example where Steller's Sea Cow once lived isn't even inhabited today. Whalers didn't need to stop there to hunt them - there were other food sources, but they chose to because by all accounts their meat taste better than seals. We aren't really better than those sailors as we do something similar in our lives today, like feeling we NEED to eat meat every day. I know that it's impossible for most people to think through every decision they make and it's probably not fair to, but I don't think there's any good excuse for not even managing low hanging fruits like saving giraffes/elephants and lowering ship speeds in whale or manatee habitats. There's also a number of projects in the works for mining the ocean which no one is talking about but will certainly push some of the marine habitats already stressed by overfishing to the breaking point.
That's a good point you bring up. It's also worth noting that in the case of many regional species such as Steller's Sea Cow or the dodo, the impact wasn't realized until it was too late. Those species were already on a decline and we delivered the final blow without understanding that there weren't any left. The dodo was not recognized as extinct until the 19th century, despite it having disappeared in the 17th.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top