
07-22-2013, 11:40 AM
|
|
|
44,713 posts, read 23,246,897 times
Reputation: 27163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4
But if Serbia ( The Government) started the war, Russias and France's pacts were null and void, similar to Italy's situation with being in the Triple alliance.
|
Interesting hypothetical, but Serbia was much the weaker power and not in a position to start anything.
|

07-22-2013, 12:51 PM
|
|
|
14,781 posts, read 41,642,704 times
Reputation: 14594
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander
Most important person...let's think about this...
Probably be the one who won the most impressive military victory, the one which mostly won WW II and was the most important battle of western civilization, unless it was the most Pyrric victory by the worst English king whose misrule caused Britain to briefly be the most atrocious nation.
|
...don't forget that they also need to be Italian... 
|

07-22-2013, 12:52 PM
|
|
|
14,781 posts, read 41,642,704 times
Reputation: 14594
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciceropolo
Snowball7 must have recently read Mark Twain
"It takes a thousand men to invent a telegraph, or a steam engine, or a phonograph, or a photograph, or a telephone or any other important thing—and the last man gets the credit and we forget the others. He added his little mite — that is all he did. These object lessons should teach us that ninety-nine parts of all things that proceed from the intellect are plagiarisms, pure and simple; and the lesson ought to make us modest. But nothing can do that.” – Mark Twain
|
No, I'm pretty sure he's just crazy. 
|

07-22-2013, 03:48 PM
|
|
|
12,833 posts, read 13,167,095 times
Reputation: 9268
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
Interesting hypothetical, but Serbia was much the weaker power and not in a position to start anything.
|
Ok, if the War started later, Russia would have either fell out of the war faster due to Revolution, or Lenin would have played little role in the Revolution if it has happened 2 or 3 years later. Maybe leading to a German Victory in the end, or a very different Soviet Union.
|

07-24-2013, 01:25 PM
|
|
|
Location: Victoria TX
42,661 posts, read 83,179,789 times
Reputation: 36535
|
|
It is entirely possible that we will never know, because the most important man might have circumvented a disastrous historical event. As a hypothetical illustration, John F Kennedy instigated the Vietnam war, perhaps the most horrible of modern times, and came within a hair of precipitating a nuclear exchange over Cuba. Given that, one could argue that he was potentially the most hell-bent dangerous man ever elected to the presidency, and the most important man of the century was Lee Harvey Oswald, who ended the Kennedy administration before any harm could be done.
If somebody had done something to stop Hitler in 1938, how would we know today how important that deed was?
China has not yet played out. I think if you were to step out of a time machine in the year 3013, people would say to you "Tell us about Mao". China will have a place in future history that will put Mao at the forefront of 20-th century personages.
Think of the huge importance of the transition of a World Without America to the World With America. We are now living through the transition of a World Without China to a World With China, and the emergence of China will historically define an entire era..
Last edited by jtur88; 07-24-2013 at 01:47 PM..
|

07-24-2013, 10:59 PM
|
|
|
13,413 posts, read 12,733,063 times
Reputation: 42860
|
|
I have trouble choosing between Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. Either one could easily be the most important person of the twentieth century.
|

07-24-2013, 11:10 PM
|
|
|
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,634 posts, read 14,241,977 times
Reputation: 15881
|
|
Dr. Alfred Kinsey
|

07-25-2013, 04:47 AM
|
|
|
Location: Berwick, Penna.
15,910 posts, read 10,343,287 times
Reputation: 20467
|
|
Ayn Rand, Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley, who focused the spirit and values that destroyed the last and foulest of the totalitarians, and Ronald Reagan, who finished the job.
|

07-26-2013, 12:32 AM
|
|
|
Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine
736 posts, read 844,539 times
Reputation: 778
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op
Ronald Reagan, who finished the job.
|
But nevertheless totalitarianism has not ended, and was shattered into fine parts that has not reduced its danger.
I consider a little underestimated Yeltzin figure, and overestimated - а Gorbachev, in fact Yeltzin, instead of Gorbachev has put a final point in disorder of the USSR.
Itself has given a thought on the most important figure and I can not enter into Stalin, Hitler, Churchill or Мао - they have not left a heritage, all of them undertakings are destroyed by history, there is no USSR, no Reich, British Empire and Communist China. Probably in the USA there are some undertakings of Roosevelt, which still operate. Flr blacks it is Martin Luther King and Mandela, but for all others they not heroes, more likely to the contrary.
|

07-26-2013, 01:19 PM
|
|
|
44,713 posts, read 23,246,897 times
Reputation: 27163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op
Ronald Reagan, who finished the job.
|
Correction: Ronald Reagan, who was in power when the Soviets collapsed and didn't f.ck it up.
People like Lech Walesa, Vaclav Havel, Yeltsin and Gorbachev did way more, with much less, and at a much higher personal risk.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|