Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Invasion would only have been necessary to achieve an "unconditional" surrender. By mid 1945, Japan was ready to negotiate peace on terms very favorable to the allies.
Apparently not favorable enough. Why isn't the narrative that Japan had opportunity to surrender before dropping the bombs in a way that was very favorable to them?
Losers of a war they started don't get to set the terms of their surrender, or decide what is favorable or not to those they have attacked, murdered, tortured, raped, slaughtered. Youtube: Rape of Nanking.
The Germans didn't have that luxury, as they surrendered unconditionally.
For a guy who apparently lives in Japan, you are shockingly ignorant of Japanese culture
No doubt. After 22 years here am still shockingly ignorant. My kids certainly would agree. I've lived in Japan far longer than they have but know far less.
Quote:
Hell, we had to drop a SECOND atomic bomb on them to get our point across.
Yes, and our point was this: we have the means and the will to kill every last one of you if you don't meet our demands.
Did the fire bombings bring Japan to surrender????
Thankfully Japan surrendered after the second bomb because we didn't have another, look at Okinawa and increase the casualties a few hundred percent...
The entire population of Japan was going to resist an American invasion.....
Tell me, why was forcing unconditional surrender such a necessity? By August of 1945 Japan was no longer a threat. It could not project power. A highly favorable treaty was well within reach.
No doubt. After 22 years here am still shockingly ignorant. My kids certainly would agree. I've lived in Japan far longer than they have but know far less.
Yes, and our point was this: we have the means and the will to kill every last one of you if you don't meet our demands.
Tell me, why was forcing unconditional surrender such a necessity? By August of 1945 Japan was no longer a threat. It could not project power. A highly favorable treaty was well within reach.
Like Germany after WW 1? Word was many Germans felt like they could've won that war even tho their country surrendered. Japan had to be taken down and hard.
As sad as it was, unfortunately it was a necessary evil. We can only hope that nuclear weapons will never be used again. You know... that learning from history thing that we conveniently forget.
You must be totally ignorant concerning the will, resolve and pride of the Japanese people.
.....
Two bombs and they folded like a deck of cards.... It carries extra weight when the targets are civilians, but Germans did not surrender even after taking civilian casualties worst than the Japanese.
Those who opposed us dropping the bomb on Japan also either ignore or are ignorant of the things Japan did to it's neighboring countries, Pacific islands, and POWs. Chemical and biological weapons tested on villages in China, medical experiments on living humans, live human dissection, the raping of Nanking (so horrible a Nazi party member sent messages to Hitler begging him to get Japan to stop), cutting the flesh from live prisoners to use as food, and Japanese sailors pulling the enemy, whose ship they sunk, from the water just to get a chance to chop their heads off. Many Japanese units, upon hearing of the surrender a d to release their prisoners, executed their prisoners instead.
Atrocities go on all over the world today. Who you wanna nuke?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.