Hitler vs Stalin (Who was worse)? (WWII, European, invaded, Russians)

[EricS39]

Arguably Stalin murdered more souls, but I think considering Stalin continued on after 1945 and when he died there was nothing catastrophic between 1952 and the 1989 end of Berlin Wall people are living in Russia,

But Hitler almost killed 100% of European Jewry that didn't migrate by 1939, I have to say he was worse and emotionally more traumatic with the whole racial Aryan superiority thing and the humiliation of whole races of people.

I say Hitler more evil than Stalin.

[ChestRockwell]

Hitler didn't almost kill "100% of Jewry"

A better question would be, who was worse? Hitler or Churchill?

Churchill starved millions of Indians to death.

[EricS39]

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

Hitler didn't almost kill "100% of Jewry"

A better question would be, who was worse? Hitler or Churchill?

Churchill starved millions of Indians to death.

You can't be serious. Churchill was not worse than Hitler. If not for Churchill the Nazis would have never turned to Russia and we would be possibly living in an Aryan Reich in America.

[no1brownsfan]

What I've learned from history, both were ruthless evil tyrants, and IMO opinion both can rot in Hell!

[ChestRockwell]

Originally Posted by EricS39

You can't be serious. Churchill was not worse than Hitler. If not for Churchill the Nazis would have never turned to Russia and we would be possibly living in an Aryan Reich in America.

An "Aryan Reich" was never, ever going to happen here, however, a "Bankers Reich" did.

[West Coast Republican]

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

Hitler didn't almost kill "100% of Jewry"

A better question would be, who was worse? Hitler or Churchill?

Churchill starved millions of Indians to death.

What a completely stupid thing to say. I'm not rude on here, but equating Churchill, a good man who was against the Nazis from the get go and we couldn't have stopped them without his help, with Hitler is absolutely disguising. It's obvious that you don't know your history either.

To the OP, both Stalin and Hitler were terrible people, it doesn't matter who was more terrible, they were both parasites to our world.

[EmeraldCityWanderer]

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

Hitler didn't almost kill "100% of Jewry"

A better question would be, who was worse? Hitler or Churchill?

Churchill starved millions of Indians to death.

That's an interesting view of history, where does it come from?

[Tallybalt]

He's probably referring to this:

Bengal famine of 1943 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As you can see it was a very complex situation so specifically blaming it on Churchill is misleading.

Stalin and Hitler specifically ordered the massacres of millions of people. Churchill did not.

Originally Posted by EmeraldCityWanderer

That's an interesting view of history, where does it come from?

[Tallybalt]

Hitler was worse than Stalin.

Not only did he start WWII and unleash the horrors of not only the holocaust but invading armies all across Europe, Hitler practiced a deliberate racial cleansing policy. Stalin, for all his horrors and flaws, did not. The brutality of the Red Army as it chased the retreating Nazis was directly in reaction to the terrors the Nazis had unleashed on the Russians when they first invaded the Soviet Union.

[thatguydownsouth]

Originally Posted by EricS39

Arguably Stalin murdered more souls, but I think considering Stalin continued on after 1945 and when he died there was nothing catastrophic between 1952 and the 1989 end of Berlin Wall people are living in Russia,

But Hitler almost killed 100% of European Jewry that didn't migrate by 1939, I have to say he was worse and emotionally more traumatic with the whole racial Aryan superiority thing and the humiliation of whole races of people.

I say Hitler more evil than Stalin.

So Stalin killing 20 Million people isnt as evil as Hitler killing 6 million jews? So your saying jews are worth more than a non jew? Both were horrible but Stalin killed vastly more people, making him worse.