Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 07:07 AM
 
54 posts, read 58,350 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

When did humans first leave Africa? Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2014, 01:33 PM
 
579 posts, read 759,079 times
Reputation: 617
Oldest human fossils have been found in Spain and Asia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,754,935 times
Reputation: 40161
The earliest evidence of an ex-African presence by a Homo species is around 1.8-2.0 million years ago. This species is generally called Homo erectus, though a minority of paleontologists recognize the earliest such fossils as belonging to the species Homo egaster, proposed by some to exist in addition to H. erectus. Note that this is a classification dispute, not a dating dispute.

This is a good start if you're interested in reading on the subject:
Early Human Evolution:* Homo ergaster and erectus
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,017 posts, read 20,856,158 times
Reputation: 32530
An interesting and complex question. First of all it's pretty well established that there was more than one exodus out of Africa, and that the groups which left first did not evolve into Homo Sapiens. Second, what do we understand by "humans"? If we want to restrict that term to anatomically modern humans, it changes the question around.

Third, it's hard to imagine a field which is changing as rapidly as paleoanthropology. New fossils (or more likely partial fossils) keep coming to light, as well as DNA studies, resulting in re-thinking of the tenuous links in our evolutionary tree. Any book or article on this subject should be fairly recent if it's to be considered authoritative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 06:27 AM
 
54 posts, read 58,350 times
Reputation: 11
Ok. When did Homo Sapiens leave Africa ? Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 07:51 AM
 
Location: SC
2,966 posts, read 5,196,635 times
Reputation: 6925
Modern genetics and newer fossil evidence is starting to disprove the old Out of Africa theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 07:54 AM
 
54 posts, read 58,350 times
Reputation: 11
Oh, really? What does modern genetics and newer fossil evidence show? Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 07:55 AM
 
1,535 posts, read 1,381,182 times
Reputation: 2099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrolava View Post
Ok. When did Homo Sapiens leave Africa ? Thanks
I think even the Homo Sapiens qualifier needs to be broken down into anatomically modern Homo Sapiens and earlier variants of Homo Sapiens.

Anatomically modern Homo Sapiens arrived in Australia about 50,000 years ago. I beleive that they left Africa at relatively the same time (migratory people can cover a good deal of ground relatively fast).

As the other poster said, there have probably been several out of Africa migrations with some waves being far more successful than others. For example, an early wave was hit hard by a volcanic eruption in Indonesia. As human popualtions were very small, and did not have alot of food reserves etc, it did not take much of an impact on weather / cooling to put people in grave danger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 12:32 PM
 
4,449 posts, read 4,597,625 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Anatomically modern Homo Sapiens arrived in Australia about 50,000 years ago. I beleive that they left Africa at relatively the same time (migratory people can cover a good deal of ground relatively fast).
I've seen that figure of 50,000 years ago as well.

Back in '09 a genetic survey of people in Africa (Tishkoff-Ehret study ) suggested that after getting the African data and combining it with DNA information from the rest of the world the believed the area for the origin of humans was in southwestern Afrcia near the Kalahari desert. And they also indicated that they believed the first humans who left Africa left from the midpoint off the African coast on the Red Sea. I believe the results of this genetic study was published in Science magaizne in 2009. Not sure of the overall critical reaction to it. Some specializing in African anthropology thought it impressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 01:30 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,163,635 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrolava View Post
Oh, really? What does modern genetics and newer fossil evidence show? Thanks
Modern genetics shows that modern humans are a mosaic of different human species. A few years ago it was confirmed that humans interbred with Neanderthals, but not all humans, just the humans that left Africa. And it looks like the interbreeding was just something that happened at just one point in time and only with the first homo sapiens that left Africa. All non-Africans are between 1-4 percent Neanderthal (on average, some populations and individuals have more Neanderthal genes). 4 percent may not seem like much, but it's the equivalent of your great-great-great grandfather being a Neanderthal.

The interesting thing is that different populations carry different Neanderthal genes. This is due to genetic drift. So Chinese have different Neanderthal genes than Swedes, which may affect the different populations in different ways.

Also, recently it was discovered that Melanesian and Australian aborigines are 6 percent Denisovan, a newly discovered human species. So including Neanderthal admixture, they are at least 10 percent "other human."

But that is not the end of it. Now that geneticists know what to look for, they are finding evidence of archaic admixture in populations all over the world. West Africans have at least 13 percent of their genes from an unidentified human species.

The out of Africa model has been rewritten.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top