Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are American tanks today as good as German tanks back in WW2?
Yes 27 90.00%
No, America still has a ways to go 3 10.00%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-05-2015, 03:59 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,134,340 times
Reputation: 46680

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 50states View Post
There is no comparison at all - none.

The technological advancements since 1945 are staggering and American tanks are the finest armored beasts ever produced.

What's next, OP - comparing a German Stuka JU87G to an American A-10 Thunderbolt II?
I think the Graf Spee vs. the modern-day Ticoderoga. Both cruisers, right? Forget that one is equipped with Aegis missiles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2015, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,623,138 times
Reputation: 17966
I wish this were a public poll, because I'd sure like to see who voted "no!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,488 posts, read 6,507,283 times
Reputation: 3793
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
I think the Graf Spee vs. the modern-day Ticoderoga. Both cruisers, right? Forget that one is equipped with Aegis missiles.
Er, um, that would be the Ticonderoga. And it ain't Aegis missiles (no such thing). It is the Aegis SYSTEM which includes missiles of several different types.

-- Nighteyes(who worked for the appropriate radar and missile systems company, and knows his hat from third base on the matter)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 04:25 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,134,340 times
Reputation: 46680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
Er, um, that would be the Ticonderoga. And it ain't Aegis missiles (no such thing). It is the Aegis SYSTEM which includes missiles of several different types.

-- Nighteyes(who worked for the appropriate radar and missile systems company, and knows his hat from third base on the matter)
Thanks for that bit of pedantry on my rather hasty post. But, when it comes to the big picture, am I wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,488 posts, read 6,507,283 times
Reputation: 3793
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
Thanks for that bit of pedantry on my rather hasty post. But, when it comes to the big picture, am I wrong?
You say "pedantry"; I say "accuracy." And no, you're not wrong.

The "pocket battleship" Admiral Graf Spee was state-of-the-art in 1939. Having no radar it depended on being within visual range of its targets. Today, any warship could engage and sink it without ever peeking over the visual horizon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 05:23 PM
 
Location: The DMV
6,589 posts, read 11,277,081 times
Reputation: 8653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
This "discussion" reminds me of the legendary Tiger ace Michael Wittman's attack on a British armored column in Villers-Bocage the day after the Normandy invasion. The British unit was an advance column of the British 7th Armoured Division, and Wittman engaged the entire column almost singlehandedly. Ordering the other tanks in his company to hold their positions and support him, he proceeded to attack the entire column head-on - just drove his Tiger down the road straight at them, blowing up every single vehicle in the column one by one. In less than 15 minutes, he destroyed approximately 15 tanks and another 13 or 14 support vehicles and anti-tank guns. Here's a picture of the road after he passed -


That's one WWII tank against a column of other WWII tanks. Put an M1A1 Abrams against a column of WWII armor, and multiply that carnage by a factor of about 10. No WWII ever produced could even scratch an Abrams (unless they landed a lucky hit on a track), and the only thing that would limit the number of tanks the Abrams destroyed would be the amount of ammunition it had on board.

Oh, and yes - even the 25MM chain gun on a Bradley would destroy any WWII tank ever made. The Bradley killed a number of T-55s during the first Gulf War, and is even credited with killing T-72s at close range. It would shred a Tiger.
I started reading that first part - and immediately heard Higgins voice talking to Magnum...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,488 posts, read 6,507,283 times
Reputation: 3793
Quote:
Originally Posted by macroy View Post
I started reading that first part - and immediately heard Higgins voice talking to Magnum...
Few people on this Board are likely to understand your reference.

I do.

Well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 06:56 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,329 posts, read 60,500,026 times
Reputation: 60912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
Few people on this Board are likely to understand your reference.

I do.

Well done.
As do I.


Oh, the OP for this thread is now known as ILIketheJackson5 and is arguing about how we knew the Civil War was over or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,488 posts, read 6,507,283 times
Reputation: 3793
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
Oh, the OP for this thread is now known as ILIketheJackson5 and is arguing about how we knew the Civil War was over or something.
I noticed. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2015, 09:35 PM
 
5,114 posts, read 6,084,776 times
Reputation: 7184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
You say "pedantry"; I say "accuracy." And no, you're not wrong.

The "pocket battleship" Admiral Graf Spee was state-of-the-art in 1939. Having no radar it depended on being within visual range of its targets. Today, any warship could engage and sink it without ever peeking over the visual horizon.
To continue your quest for accuracy the Graf Spee did have a radar system. I remember reading an article a few years ago (when part of the ship was being salvaged to be sent back to Germany) that the British mission to Uruguay had at least attempted to salvage some of the radar equipment almost as soon as the wreckage cooled after it was scuttled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top