Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2015, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
197 posts, read 279,435 times
Reputation: 244

Advertisements

I'm interested in Los Angeles in the 19th century. On the Wikipedia page, they list U.S. Census numbers by the decade:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_An...ty,_California

The biggest jump by percent was 1850-1860, 221%. I was wondering if any knew what brought that many people into the county? Was it just that California was a new state, so people came in looking for land?

1880-1890 also had a big jump of 200%. What was happening to cause this?

Any other early California history fans here? There are a fair number of books on 20th century Los Angeles, but rather less on the 19th century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2015, 10:24 PM
 
1,047 posts, read 1,014,321 times
Reputation: 1817
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamReady2Move View Post
I'm interested in Los Angeles in the 19th century. On the Wikipedia page, they list U.S. Census numbers by the decade:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_An...ty,_California

The biggest jump by percent was 1850-1860, 221%. I was wondering if any knew what brought that many people into the county? Was it just that California was a new state, so people came in looking for land?

1880-1890 also had a big jump of 200%. What was happening to cause this?

Any other early California history fans here? There are a fair number of books on 20th century Los Angeles, but rather less on the 19th century.
It might require a subscription to see them on-line, but the two federal censuses from that period would be a gold mine of info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 11:17 PM
 
Location: TOVCCA
8,452 posts, read 15,043,863 times
Reputation: 12532
A few things:

1850-1860: In July 1861 rebels claimed the Arizona Territory for the Confederacy and there was the intention of not only making California a slave state, but the conquest of the gold fields in northern CA was on the agenda. Bet you didn't know the Union built a military fort in SoCal--Drum Barracks. Check it out: Home

1880-1890: Also check out the Huntington Museum. Collis Huntington built the Southern Pacific Railway that eventually linked SoCal to the rest of the US. He was a ruthless robber baron, one of the worst actually, but you'll never hear that at the museum. His mansion is also there to tour: Collis P. Huntington
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 06:06 AM
 
936 posts, read 823,826 times
Reputation: 2525
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamReady2Move View Post
I'm interested in Los Angeles in the 19th century. On the Wikipedia page, they list U.S. Census numbers by the decade:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_An...ty,_California

The biggest jump by percent was 1850-1860, 221%. I was wondering if any knew what brought that many people into the county? Was it just that California was a new state, so people came in looking for land?
Probably the Gold Rush. The early California gold miners were called "Forty-Niners" because they arrived in the state in 1849 (one year before the census). These people were probably passing through LA on the way to the gold fields and were counted by the census takers. --Of course, everything about California was greatly exaggerated (same as today ). Few people actually found any gold.

BTW, the LA census records from 1850 are a part of my family tree. I had relatives who moved from Iowa to LA in 1850 (for the gold rush). By 1860, they were back in Iowa after they didn't find any gold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 01:17 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,177,253 times
Reputation: 32581
Part of it could have been from the fact they expanded the boundaries if the city. Places that were on the outskirts became part of Los Angeles. There was a real estate boom. There was also job growth. L.A. supplied foodstuffs and goods for the miners swarming Gold Country.

Edit: I looked at Wikipedia to double check my memory from fourth grade history. Someone slipped "Lakers Suck" in a paragraph title in the Wiki article on the history of L.A. Lol...must be a Clippers fan.

Last edited by DewDropInn; 10-28-2015 at 01:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 03:46 PM
 
Location: SoCal & Mid-TN
2,325 posts, read 2,652,251 times
Reputation: 2874
Kevin Starr, the state historian, has excellent books on every era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2015, 06:48 AM
 
212 posts, read 208,960 times
Reputation: 68
Tales of old california
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2015, 05:00 AM
 
4,432 posts, read 6,984,164 times
Reputation: 2261
It was the gold rush that attracted so many people to California in the 1850s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2015, 08:19 PM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,281,227 times
Reputation: 40978
Quote:
Originally Posted by other99 View Post
It was the gold rush that attracted so many people to California in the 1850s.
Exactly, plain and simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 12:07 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,485,386 times
Reputation: 15184
The Gold Rush in the 1850s was in the northern and central Sierra, well away from California. Most of the migration to California at that time was to San Francisco and some nearby coastal cities, a few valley towns and farms to the east and the Sierra east of those. 221% isn't as huge of a jump as it sounds given the starting population was tiny.

San Francisco boomed much faster; it went from 1,000 people to 25,000 in one year (1848 to 1849). By 1860, it had 57,000 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top