Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2016, 10:37 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,794 posts, read 2,799,413 times
Reputation: 4925

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
It was American manufacturing capability that defeated Japan (and largely Germany), far more than any other factor. Japan never had the production capacity, nor the resources, to win a war against us. ...
Yah, we - the US - out produced everybody, & from almost a standing start, by the end of the war. Even by the middle of the war - remember that WWII in ETO started 09/01/39 - we didn't get in until 12/07/41. Yes, the US produced ships, tanks, arty, airplanes, small arms, trucks, food. We sold or traded or Lend Leased to all the Allies, eventually. We raised 90 divisions - enough to make a difference, but a small enough number that we could train, equip, transport & deploy.


The UK provided Radar, Sonar, signals intercepts, decryption, a general staff that we modeled on, & Worldwide resources & personnel & bases. The USSR fought & bled & sustained enormous losses in military, civilians & materiel. They inflicted terrible losses upon the German military & their allies, & eventually swamped Germany altogether.


Yah, the US largely harried Japan back across the Pacific - but they committed their troops to a senseless war in China - & never could extract them. It took them until 1946 to get all their people (military & civilians) back out of China, Manchuria, Korea, Indochina, Philippines, Netherlands East Indies, etc. Germany managed their war effort better than Japan, although Hitler kept sacrificing units rather than letting them retreat to fight another day.


Looking @ the histories I've read so far, I think the USSR was irreplaceable in the ETO victory. UK was gun-shy, after the enormous losses in WWI. France & the Low Countries were overrun quickly, along with most of Europe. I think without the US, the war would have ground on for @ least another year. I don't believe that Stalin would ever have quit. He was determined to grind Germany into the dust.


Japan was simply not ready, & would never be ready. They relied upon spiritual strength to make up any deficiencies in men & materiel - that plus a number of their victories were gained @ the cost of throwing in the reserves & going for broke. Some of their victories in WWII had paper-thin margins - which worked until they squared off against the US production & manpower & rich natural resources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2016, 11:37 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,300 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
(awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve, in the words of Yamamoto).
He never actually said that. It was added to "Tora, Tora, Tora" by the producer to give a bit of an upbeat ending for US audiences. There is no mention of this anywhere prior to the release of the movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2016, 11:40 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,626,379 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Looking @ the histories I've read so far, I think the USSR was irreplaceable in the ETO victory. UK was gun-shy, after the enormous losses in WWI. France & the Low Countries were overrun quickly, along with most of Europe. I think without the US, the war would have ground on for @ least another year. I don't believe that Stalin would ever have quit. He was determined to grind Germany into the dust.

Without the Soviets, we probably never could have beaten Germany. They Wehrmacht lost almost 5 million men on the Eastern Front, and as of D-Day they had over 3 million men fighting on the Eastern Front. In June of 44, they had 66 divisions dedicated to running backwards from Russia, and only 12 to defend France. Had they not been at war with the Russians, they would have had millions more troops to defend the French coast, and thousands more tanks. We'd never have made it ashore. Britain and the US would have had to pursue a negotiated peace, and Hitler and Stalin would have basically split continental Europe up between themselves.

Last edited by Mr. In-Between; 05-03-2016 at 11:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 05:08 AM
 
Location: az
13,709 posts, read 7,987,762 times
Reputation: 9389
Quote:
Originally Posted by bus man View Post
As readers of this forum no doubt know, the American aircraft carriers stationed in the Pacific in December 1941 were fortuitously absent from Pearl Harbor on the morning of the 7th. But what if they hadn't been? Saratoga was in San Diego when the attack happened, so it seems a bit of a stretch -- even for an alternate-history thread -- to put her at Pearl Harbor on that fateful morning. But Lexington wasn't too far away, and Enterprise was even closer; indeed, she would have been there when the bombs fell if she hadn't been delayed by a storm the night before.

So, how do you think the war would have progressed if Enterprise and Lexington had been pounded into the muddy bottom of Pearl Harbor? (Assume that the Saratoga gets torpedoed at sea a few days later as she did in real life, and thus misses Coral Sea and Midway.) It seems to me that if Lexington were gone, we might not have attempted to save New Guinea, thus no Battle of the Coral Sea. Or, alternately, we might have; but it seems likely that Yorktown would have received the bombs that actually went to Lexington in addition to the ones fated for her, and thus she almost certainly would have been sunk. In real life, Enterprise and Yorktown (relocated from the Atlantic) were solely responsible for sinking all four Japanese carriers at Midway; what would have happened if one or both of them hadn't been there? (Would there even have been a Battle of Midway if we didn't have all three of the carriers used there, or would we have decided to preserve our remaining flattops and thus not contested the invasion?)

What are your thoughts?


The Japanese high command was well aware they couldn't win a protracted war with the U.S.

The idea was to make a deal not long after the war started and get the Americans off their back about Japan moving into China and Southeast Asia.

Unfortunately, the Japanese vastly underestimated the fury of the American people who didn't just want an end to the war but revenge.

Last edited by john3232; 05-04-2016 at 05:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 05:15 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,300 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
Without the Soviets, we probably never could have beaten Germany. They Wehrmacht lost almost 5 million men on the Eastern Front, and as of D-Day they had over 3 million men fighting on the Eastern Front. In June of 44, they had 66 divisions dedicated to running backwards from Russia, and only 12 to defend France. Had they not been at war with the Russians, they would have had millions more troops to defend the French coast, and thousands more tanks. We'd never have made it ashore. Britain and the US would have had to pursue a negotiated peace, and Hitler and Stalin would have basically split continental Europe up between themselves.
They would have eventually gotten tired of being nuked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 09:45 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,794 posts, read 2,799,413 times
Reputation: 4925
Default Hitler & Stalin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
Without the Soviets, we probably never could have beaten Germany. They Wehrmacht lost almost 5 million men on the Eastern Front, and as of D-Day they had over 3 million men fighting on the Eastern Front. In June of 44, they had 66 divisions dedicated to running backwards from Russia, and only 12 to defend France. Had they not been at war with the Russians, they would have had millions more troops to defend the French coast, and thousands more tanks. We'd never have made it ashore. Britain and the US would have had to pursue a negotiated peace, and Hitler and Stalin would have basically split continental Europe up between themselves.
Without the USSR, the US military estimate for required manpower was 213 US Army divisions, plus heavy AAF bomber force, plus built-up US Navy, plus UK & Commonwealth military & bases, plus any other Allies - Polish, French, & so on.


As to Hitler & Stalin - Hitler leased space in the USSR to train, equip & temporarily hide the revived Army & Air force Germany was forbidden to have, per WWI terms. They also bought raw materials from USSR - hard currency that the Soviets were glad to have. Stalin purged the Soviet military officer corps of political unreliables, & thus crippled the effectiveness of their military. He also signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler - planning to abrogate it @ the proper time, which never arrived. Stalin also wreaked considerable havoc in economic planning, moving ethnic populations about, destroying the Kulaks in Ukraine, wrecking agricultural output, taking & distributing cropland. The political paranoia @ the top led to purges, layers of competing secret services - army, political, naval, border guards, labor camps, work camps & massive waste of resources in a vain attempt to stifle all dissent. All of which led to hunger, forced marches, disease - & a lot of political disaffection in Russia. All of which made the USSR ripe for invasion by Germany.


Stalin was not going to leave Hitler in power anywhere, nor the Nazi regime, nor Germany as a potential threat in future. If Hitler didn't manage to conquer the USSR in the first 6 months of the campaign, he was never going to do it. The Soviets never bothered to count the cost during the war - they simply kept raising armies, training, equipping, & sometimes driving tanks & arty directly out of the factory & into combat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Lightbulb What if U.S. aircraft carriers had been sunk at Pearl Harbor?

I have a better one!

What if US subs formed a wolfpack and sank the Nippon fleet the day after Pearl Harbor?

That woulda made Hirohito nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 12:09 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,300 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
I have a better one!

What if US subs formed a wolfpack and sank the Nippon fleet the day after Pearl Harbor?

That woulda made Hirohito nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs!
That's one of my favorite responses to the Let It Happen On Purpose CTers. Twenty subs waiting for the IJN to launch their planes, then firing 120 torpedoes in the carriers. Thing would have gotten frisky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 12:53 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,794 posts, read 2,799,413 times
Reputation: 4925
Default Running hot & true

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpanaPointer View Post
That's one of my favorite responses to the Let It Happen On Purpose CTers. Twenty subs waiting for the IJN to launch their planes, then firing 120 torpedoes in the carriers. Thing would have gotten frisky.


Yah, except that US torpedoes early in the war were ineffective. The problem had to do with the sensors, as I recall. We fired a lot of duds early on, & likely lost crews because of that. See U.S. Torpedo Troubles During World War II | HistoryNet for details.


So no - it took us a long time to find & fix the problems - it was a regular cascade of issues. (& the Mark XIV torp had a long & ugly problem history anyway.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2016, 01:02 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,300 times
Reputation: 2172
All the more fun! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DUDS! The Japanese would freak, thinking we were counting coup or something. I can imagine what Nagumo and his flag officers would be trying to figure out what kind of trap we really meant to spring.

Meanwhile, very few of their planes come back, meaning the IJA air threat at the Solomons is greatly reduced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top