Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2016, 06:05 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,910 times
Reputation: 2172

Advertisements

The Japanese military didn't kill Gojira, a scientific break-through got him in the end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2016, 04:47 AM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,219 posts, read 29,040,205 times
Reputation: 32626
Let's not forget who armed Japan in the first place!

The U.S., IMO, with its unending fear/hatred of Communism, secretly wanted capitalistic Japan to overtake China, so let's point those missiles in the right direction!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 08:20 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,910 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
Let's not forget who armed Japan in the first place!

The U.S., IMO, with its unending fear/hatred of Communism, secretly wanted capitalistic Japan to overtake China, so let's point those missiles in the right direction!
Ah, the USluminati theory. Very clever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,219 posts, read 29,040,205 times
Reputation: 32626
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpanaPointer View Post
Ah, the USluminati theory. Very clever.
At one time, there were 6 imperialist powers eager to carve up China: Britain, Russia, France, Japan, Germany and the U.S., and they came close to accomplishing that. And can you blame China for turning to Mao and Communism?

The U.S. would have resorted to any measure to stop China from embracing Communism, as they did in so many other countries in the world.

Japan overtaking China! Well, anything is better than Communism, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 08:49 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,687,668 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
The U.S. would have resorted to any measure to stop China from embracing Communism, as they did in so many other countries in the world.
Except we didn't...along the lines of your theory, why didn't we just simply intervene in the Chinese civil war and toss Mao out? It was certainly within the ability of our military at the time.

Quote:
Japan overtaking China! Well, anything is better than Communism, right?
If that was the goal, then why did we disarm Japan and tie its hands in terms of engaging in war?

You're ranting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 09:10 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,303,910 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
At one time, there were 6 imperialist powers eager to carve up China: Britain, Russia, France, Japan, Germany and the U.S., and they came close to accomplishing that. And can you blame China for turning to Mao and Communism?

The U.S. would have resorted to any measure to stop China from embracing Communism, as they did in so many other countries in the world.

Japan overtaking China! Well, anything is better than Communism, right?
I think you've heard of the Nine Power Treaty?

And I'm not privy to Mao's motivations. I do know the US wasn't actually worried about Communism in China in the '30s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Houston/Brenham
5,819 posts, read 7,232,679 times
Reputation: 12317
What if...China decided "hay, its payback time"

Every time I see this subject title, I think "What did hay do to p*ss off China?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2016, 09:49 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,943,866 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
The simple answer is...they couldn't invade if they wanted to. China's navy is "green water"...

Brown water navy = only able to operate in rivers and coastal areas.
Green water navy = only able to operate in the nations own littoral areas, but has ships capable of regional ocean going.
Blue water navy = capable of operating anywhere.

China does not have the sea lift capability and logistics to enable an invasion of Taiwan, let alone the Japanese home islands. They are building up to blue water capability, but at this point cannot even support ships being away from their home waters, let alone support a seaborne invasion consisting of millions of troops. The Japanese defense forces would destroy them before they even landed.
Yeh but Japan is not that far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,812,975 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
The simple answer is...they couldn't invade if they wanted to. China's navy is "green water"...

Brown water navy = only able to operate in rivers and coastal areas.
Green water navy = only able to operate in the nations own littoral areas, but has ships capable of regional ocean going.
Blue water navy = capable of operating anywhere.

China does not have the sea lift capability and logistics to enable an invasion of Taiwan, let alone the Japanese home islands. They are building up to blue water capability, but at this point cannot even support ships being away from their home waters, let alone support a seaborne invasion consisting of millions of troops. The Japanese defense forces would destroy them before they even landed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Yeh but Japan is not that far.
You might want to look at a map.

It's over 500 miles from the Chinese coast to Kyushu, the nearest of the four main Japanese islands to China.

Then you might want to have a look at Chinese amphibious capability. It exists, but its very limited. In such a case, 500 miles might as well be 5000 miles. And then you might want to have a look at the air power of the two countries. China has the numbers (though not by all that much) but Japan has the quality. And Japan wouldn't be fighting at the end of a 500-mile logistical tether.

Short of pulling out the nukes (which would be even more ludicrous than this hypothetical already is), China couldn't pull off a successful invasion of Japan.

And that's not even taking into account that the rest of the world - ie, the United States - isn't going to sit idly by while this happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 08:50 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,943,866 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
You might want to look at a map.

It's over 500 miles from the Chinese coast to Kyushu, the nearest of the four main Japanese islands to China.

Then you might want to have a look at Chinese amphibious capability. It exists, but its very limited. In such a case, 500 miles might as well be 5000 miles. And then you might want to have a look at the air power of the two countries. China has the numbers (though not by all that much) but Japan has the quality. And Japan wouldn't be fighting at the end of a 500-mile logistical tether.

Short of pulling out the nukes (which would be even more ludicrous than this hypothetical already is), China couldn't pull off a successful invasion of Japan.

And that's not even taking into account that the rest of the world - ie, the United States - isn't going to sit idly by while this happens.
Yet, Japan is able to invade China those decades ago? It is not like Japan is somewhere in the South Pacific. It is not that far in terms of military projection.

There have been plenty of examples of US and the rest of the world sitting back. It happens in the Mideast all the time. Russia - Ukraine, Yugoslavia for the most part, much of Africa, and a whole slew of examples.

I am not saying China will invade, but if they dont, it is not because of distance. I may be fear of everyone else, but distance really should not be an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top