Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-03-2016, 04:03 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,669,164 times
Reputation: 21999

Advertisements

I'm seeing more references to Nixon's concession in the last month, presumably due to the current election.

Interesting comparison. I like that Kennedy just went off to bed.

No Concession, No Sleep: Glued to the TV on Election Night 1960
BY Michael Beschloss

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/bu...ight-1960.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2016, 07:47 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,172,734 times
Reputation: 32581
The Ambassador Hotel, election night headquarters for Richard Nixon, was also used by Bobby Kennedy when Bobby campaigned for president in 1968. Kennedy was assassinated while walking through a part of the hotel's kitchen after winning the CA primary and addressing his supporters who were gathered in the ballroom.

It was demolished in 2005 and several schools were built on the site. They are named the Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2016, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,215 posts, read 11,333,999 times
Reputation: 20828
The election was still undecided the following morning, with several states still contested, NBC "officially" credited California to JFK at around 7:15 EST the next morning, but it turned out that Nixon would eventually regain the state on the absentee ballots; that issue wasn't resolved until well into December, but by that time, several other contests had been decided in JFK's favor. Nixon was also urged to pursue fairly well-substantiated charges of voter fraud in Richard Daley's Chicago, but reportedly declined.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2016, 06:02 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,669,164 times
Reputation: 21999
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
Nixon was also urged to pursue fairly well-substantiated charges of voter fraud in Richard Daley's Chicago, but reportedly declined.
I thought that was one of the few commendable things he did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2016, 06:46 AM
 
618 posts, read 938,915 times
Reputation: 533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
I thought that was one of the few commendable things he did.
Nixon's operatives did investigate Chicago voting fraud as did the papers and a judge. They found no evidence.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...on_robbed.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2016, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,812,975 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
The election was still undecided the following morning, with several states still contested, NBC "officially" credited California to JFK at around 7:15 EST the next morning, but it turned out that Nixon would eventually regain the state on the absentee ballots; that issue wasn't resolved until well into December, but by that time, several other contests had been decided in JFK's favor. Nixon was also urged to pursue fairly well-substantiated charges of voter fraud in Richard Daley's Chicago, but reportedly declined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
I thought that was one of the few commendable things he did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobseeker2013 View Post
Nixon's operatives did investigate Chicago voting fraud as did the papers and a judge. They found no evidence.
Yes. The myth that Nixon 'accepted his loss despite evidence that the election was fixed, and selflessly did so for the good of the nation' is just that - a myth. Numerous investigations and challenges were launched on behalf of the Nixon campaign. Officially, he was not tied to them. But he could have headed them off had he any desire to do so. He did not.

No evidence of election-changing irregularities were found. Judges and election officials of both parties were involved in these findings. Recounts in Chicago found more votes for both candidates, but nothing that came anywhere close to altering the outcome. One state did flip during the recounts - Hawaii, which was initially called for Nixon but when ended up in Kennedy's column. It did not matter, as Kennedy's margin in the end was 84 votes in the Electoral College. For that matter, Chicago did not matter, either - even if we wave a magic wand and give Illinois (and Hawaii) to Nixon, Kennedy still wins. This fact is invariably left out of the 'Daley stole it for JFK!' narrative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top