Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:24 PM
 
387 posts, read 491,449 times
Reputation: 294

Advertisements

I will gladly explain how decadeology should be done, by starting with every decade since the 1950s:

1950s:

*Absolute duration- 1946-1963

*Actual decade- 1950-1959

*Prelude- 1946-1952
*Zeitgeist- 1953-1959
*Echo- 1960-1963

*Quintessential years- 1954-57

1960s:

*Absolute duration- 1960-1972

*Actual decade- 1960-1969

*Prelude- 1960-1963
*Zeitgeist- 1964-1969
*Echo- 1970-1972

*Quintessential years- 1964-68

1970s:

*Absolute duration- 1969-1980

*Actual decade- 1970-1979

*Prelude- 1969-1972
*Zeitgeist- 1973-1977
*Echo- 1978-1980

*Quintessential years- 1974-76

1980s:

*Absolute duration- 1978-1991

*Actual decade- 1980-1989

*Prelude- 1978-1980
*Zeitgeist- 1981-1988
*Echo- 1989-1991

*Quintessential years- 1984-87

1990s:

*Absolute duration- 1989-2001

*Actual decade- 1990-1999

*Prelude- 1989-1991
*Zeitgeist- 1992-1997
*Echo- 1998-2001

*Quintessential years- 1995-96

2000s:

*Absolute duration- 1998-2010

*Actual decade- 2000-2009

*Prelude- 1998-2001
*Zeitgeist- 2002-2007
*Echo- 2008-2010

*Quintessential years- 2004-05

2010s:

*Absolute duration- 2008-present

*Actual decade- 2010-2019

*Prelude- 2008-2010
*Zeitgeist- 2012- present
*Echo- TBD

*Quintessential years- TBD


Prelude- defines the cultural beginnings of a decade
Zeitgeist- where the culture of an existing decade is the norm
Echo- where a decade's cultural influence fizzles off

Quintessential years- years that best represent the decade.


Final summary: So as you know the prelude, zeitgeist, and echo of a decade are not actual decades but instead just portions of a decade that explain its cultural aspects. So this this here is how decadeology should work. And hopefully it will end the war on decadeology, and I am open to any questions or comments.

 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,808,159 times
Reputation: 11103
The question still remains: Were the 80's more like the 70's than the 80's? Or were the late 50's more like the early 60's than the late 50's?
 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:51 PM
 
387 posts, read 491,449 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
The question still remains: Were the 80's more like the 70's than the 80's? Or were the late 50's more like the early 60's than the late 50's?
The 80s would only be like the late 70s, but mainly for the very beginning of the actual decade. The late-50s/early-60s are more or less a unique period, meaning it's show a cultural transition between the 50s and 60s.
 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,808,159 times
Reputation: 11103
Quote:
Originally Posted by TPetty View Post
The 80s would only be like the late 70s, but mainly for the very beginning of the actual decade. The late-50s/early-60s are more or less a unique period, meaning it's show a cultural transition between the 50s and 60s.
Yes. There should be a thread on this.

No, not really, I'm kidding.
 
Old 11-15-2016, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,814,649 times
Reputation: 40166
How 'decadeology' ... ... really should be done:

Have one giant DECADEOLOGY thread where people can pondering such fascinating questions as:

*Was 1804 more like 1802 or more like 1806?
*Was the third week in June more like the last week in May or the second week in July?
*Was late Tuesday morning more like early Tuesday morning or mid-to-late Tuesday afternoon?

Then add an IGNORE THREAD feature.

The world - or, at least, City-Data - would be perfect - or, at least less tedious.
 
Old 11-16-2016, 03:13 PM
 
387 posts, read 491,449 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
How 'decadeology' ... ... really should be done:

Have one giant DECADEOLOGY thread where people can pondering such fascinating questions as:

*Was 1804 more like 1802 or more like 1806?
*Was the third week in June more like the last week in May or the second week in July?
*Was late Tuesday morning more like early Tuesday morning or mid-to-late Tuesday afternoon?

Then add an IGNORE THREAD feature.

The world - or, at least, City-Data - would be perfect - or, at least less tedious.
You are comparing apples and oranges.
 
Old 11-16-2016, 04:22 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,673 posts, read 15,672,301 times
Reputation: 10924
How decadeology should be done.

Somewhere else. This forum is to discuss History, not whether Tuesday is better than Thursday.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
 
Old 11-16-2016, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,122,692 times
Reputation: 21239
The reason we have ten year decades is because our math is done in base ten. It is in base ten because we have ten digits on our hands.

But what if Antonio Alfonseca had been the norm rather than the exception? We would have a base twelve system of math. Now, if we take all the same events that have unfolded, but rearrange the bookends because we are now in base twelve, all the supposed meaning associated with "decadeology " evaporates. Remember, the events have not changed, just our measuring system for decades.

What would happen? Would all the same events be grouped as they are now under our base ten decades, or would they get re-ordered and rethought so as to fit more closely into our base twelve decades?

I think it would be the latter. And that is one of the reasons I do not take concepts like "decadeology" with any seriousness. That there is any linkage between collective events and specific numbers of years will require a more convincing demonstration than the OP provides.
 
Old 11-17-2016, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Glasgow Scotland
18,528 posts, read 18,752,718 times
Reputation: 28773
Quote:
Originally Posted by TPetty View Post
I will gladly explain how decadeology should be done, by starting with every decade since the 1950s:

1950s:

*Absolute duration- 1946-1963

*Actual decade- 1950-1959

*Prelude- 1946-1952
*Zeitgeist- 1953-1959
*Echo- 1960-1963

*Quintessential years- 1954-57

1960s:

*Absolute duration- 1960-1972

*Actual decade- 1960-1969

*Prelude- 1960-1963
*Zeitgeist- 1964-1969
*Echo- 1970-1972

*Quintessential years- 1964-68

1970s:

*Absolute duration- 1969-1980

*Actual decade- 1970-1979

*Prelude- 1969-1972
*Zeitgeist- 1973-1977
*Echo- 1978-1980

*Quintessential years- 1974-76

1980s:

*Absolute duration- 1978-1991

*Actual decade- 1980-1989

*Prelude- 1978-1980
*Zeitgeist- 1981-1988
*Echo- 1989-1991

*Quintessential years- 1984-87

1990s:

*Absolute duration- 1989-2001

*Actual decade- 1990-1999

*Prelude- 1989-1991
*Zeitgeist- 1992-1997
*Echo- 1998-2001

*Quintessential years- 1995-96

2000s:

*Absolute duration- 1998-2010

*Actual decade- 2000-2009

*Prelude- 1998-2001
*Zeitgeist- 2002-2007
*Echo- 2008-2010

*Quintessential years- 2004-05

2010s:

*Absolute duration- 2008-present

*Actual decade- 2010-2019

*Prelude- 2008-2010
*Zeitgeist- 2012- present
*Echo- TBD

*Quintessential years- TBD


Prelude- defines the cultural beginnings of a decade
Zeitgeist- where the culture of an existing decade is the norm
Echo- where a decade's cultural influence fizzles off

Quintessential years- years that best represent the decade.


Final summary: So as you know the prelude, zeitgeist, and echo of a decade are not actual decades but instead just portions of a decade that explain its cultural aspects. So this this here is how decadeology should work. And hopefully it will end the war on decadeology, and I am open to any questions or comments.
Oh right..........
 
Old 11-17-2016, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Glasgow Scotland
18,528 posts, read 18,752,718 times
Reputation: 28773
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
How decadeology should be done.

Somewhere else. This forum is to discuss History, not whether Tuesday is better than Thursday.
Some sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top