Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2017, 12:02 PM
 
3,525 posts, read 6,521,504 times
Reputation: 1448

Advertisements

Jean, don't you have an "I" on your keyboard?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2017, 04:49 PM
 
31,887 posts, read 26,916,776 times
Reputation: 24783
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA2UK View Post
Mary definitely had the stronger claim, and they did depose her father, but William was the grandson of Charles I on his mother's side, so it's not like he didn't have any hereditary claims at all, he had a very strong claim. William and Mary were 1st cousins.

None of which alters the fact William invaded England.


There was another Stuart who was a first cousin (once removed) who had a stronger claim to the English throne; (Mary, Queen of Scots) who landed in England, and I presume you know how that sad decision ended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2017, 04:55 PM
 
Location: London U.K.
2,587 posts, read 1,593,047 times
Reputation: 5783
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpasa View Post
Jean, don't you have an "I" on your keyboard?

Okay robert, (here’s one), I give up, yes, I (there’s another), have an I on my keyboard,
Did you mean a 1? I have 1 of those too, did I do something wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2017, 05:38 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
10,207 posts, read 17,859,740 times
Reputation: 13914
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
None of which alters the fact William invaded England.
No, but I thought the point of this topic was to identify British monarchs who had no hereditary claim? Sorry for trying to remain on topic...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top