Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2018, 10:38 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
3,057 posts, read 2,035,841 times
Reputation: 11353

Advertisements

Katherine Johnson is who I immediately thought of too.
She was a "mathematician whose calculations of orbital mechanics as a NASA employee were critical to the success of the first and subsequent U.S. manned spaceflights."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Johnson

There are a lot of women who never got credit for their work, whether in math or science, including not receiving Nobel Prizes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2018, 10:40 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
3,057 posts, read 2,035,841 times
Reputation: 11353
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
A lot of them are working for Wall Street. That's where the biggest salaries can be found.

There's no Nobel Prize for mathematics, but mathematicians make up the vast bulk of people who win the Nobel Prize for Economics.
You reminded me of the American woman (first and only so far) who received the Nobel for Economics, Eleanor Ostrom. Fascinating area of research she did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 12:41 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,574,786 times
Reputation: 4730
claude shannon (shannons theorem)
jim west (lapel micro-fone)
sam morse (morse code)
dave huffman (huffman code)
...

Last edited by stanley-88888888; 08-26-2018 at 01:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 02:20 AM
 
Location: Switzerland/Ticino
283 posts, read 172,506 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanley-88888888 View Post
claude shannon (shannons theorem)
jim west (lapel micro-fone)
sam morse (morse code)
dave huffman (huffman code)
...

They used esixting "mathematics" tools...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 03:01 AM
 
Location: Switzerland/Ticino
283 posts, read 172,506 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Well, yes...but the bulk of the work in Diffy Q was done well before Nash was born. Ordinary differential equations in college is a 2nd year course.

Nash was working in fields far beyond a college sophomore's experience.

Nash didn't invent or discover any new mathematics "tools"... Also Einstein didn't "invent" any new mathematics tools..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 03:29 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.â€" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,178 posts, read 13,461,836 times
Reputation: 19477
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post

There's no Nobel Prize for mathematics, but mathematicians make up the vast bulk of people who win the Nobel Prize for Economics.


The prize for mathematics is the Fields Medal.

Fields Medal - Wikipedia

In terms of women the late Maryam Mirzakhani is the only female winner of a Fields Medal, which she win in 2014.There are currently total of 60 Fields medalists.

As fort my own country, the most famou smathematician is Isaac Newton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 05:43 AM
 
8,418 posts, read 7,414,580 times
Reputation: 8767
Quote:
Originally Posted by asiago12 View Post
They used esixting "mathematics" tools...
Quote:
Originally Posted by asiago12 View Post
Nash didn't invent or discover any new mathematics "tools"... Also Einstein didn't "invent" any new mathematics tools..
You didn't get very far in mathematics, did you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Switzerland/Ticino
283 posts, read 172,506 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
You didn't get very far in mathematics, did you?

You are wrong....I'm no a "pure mathematician" but i got a mechanical engineer degree in Switzerland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,858 posts, read 2,172,880 times
Reputation: 3032
Quote:
Originally Posted by asiago12 View Post
They used esixting "mathematics" tools...
Claude Shannon developed information theory which is the foundation of information technology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Switzerland/Ticino
283 posts, read 172,506 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkwensky View Post
Claude Shannon developed information theory which is the foundation of information technology.

What are his new mathematics "tools" to developed his theory ? ... Algebra ? nahh... Calculus ? nahh.. Topology ? nahh... Tensor calculus ? nahh...Euclidian geometry ? nahh.. Non eucledian geometry ? nahh...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top