Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2023, 05:01 AM
 
4,190 posts, read 2,501,136 times
Reputation: 6571

Advertisements

In the end, it was inflation. It was mentally exhausting to go shopping every week and see prices creeping up. He refused to implement wage and price controls as gas prices rise due to the Middle East crisis and food prices rose as the USSR's grain production failed to grow (in 1979 it fell by 26%) creating a world wide shortages. On Jan. 10, 1981 in an exit interview, Stuart Eizenstat (Carter's chief domestic policy person) said not putting in wage and price controls was Carter's biggest mistake. But Carter wanted less government, hence the deregulation and did not want to go the route Nixon went with the controls.

Last edited by webster; 04-28-2023 at 05:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2023, 05:57 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116077
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeJunior View Post
All I have to say is "20% APR prime interest rate."

Companies were driven out of business all over the place. Workers became unemployed. Families broke apart.

I worked for an auto manufacturer, and I was shutting down car dealerships every week. It was the worst of times economically.
That's so interesting, because Carter's second run for the Presidency was done in part on the platform of addressing the serious issues in the economy. Reagan waved away his concern, and made him look like a worry-wart. Reagan told the American people everything was ok. Then after he got into the Presidency, he had to recant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2023, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,555 posts, read 10,607,780 times
Reputation: 36567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
That's so interesting, because Carter's second run for the Presidency was done in part on the platform of addressing the serious issues in the economy. Reagan waved away his concern, and made him look like a worry-wart. Reagan told the American people everything was ok. Then after he got into the Presidency, he had to recant.
There you go again.

You've made this claim before in this thread, and I called you out for it, yet here you are doing it again. So I would refer you to Mr. Reagan's own words, from his own mouth, as to how he described the economy. Note that this speech was made on October 24, 1980, shortly before the election.

Here's the actual 27-minute speech:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCTs0IeHkoY

Here's the transcript:

https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archiv...ress-americans
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2023, 07:29 PM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,286,698 times
Reputation: 45726
Quote:
Originally Posted by webster View Post
In the end, it was inflation. It was mentally exhausting to go shopping every week and see prices creeping up. He refused to implement wage and price controls as gas prices rise due to the Middle East crisis and food prices rose as the USSR's grain production failed to grow (in 1979 it fell by 26%) creating a world wide shortages. On Jan. 10, 1981 in an exit interview, Stuart Eizenstat (Carter's chief domestic policy person) said not putting in wage and price controls was Carter's biggest mistake. But Carter wanted less government, hence the deregulation and did not want to go the route Nixon went with the controls.
Its much easier said than done. America was not at war and its questionable if the president would have the constitutional authority to implement wage and price controls on his own. Congress was not going to pass legislation allowing him to do so and that was a certainty.

Carter was a bright man who was simply president at the wrong time. People here can ***** about him all they want. The problem was not him. It was inflation he had not caused, the taking of our hostages, and a belief that America was being pushed around by other countries.

Presidents win reelection based not so much on their performance as on conditions prevailing in the country at the time. Whether they are responsible for those conditions is unimportant. They get the responsibility for them if not the blame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2023, 05:39 AM
 
4,190 posts, read 2,501,136 times
Reputation: 6571
Carter's deregulation model was for less govt. control, not more. Carter would have had plenty of precedent for wage and price controls; provided there was legislative authority, but as Eizenstat said, Carter would not ask for it.

Nixon instituted them under EO 11615; In WW1 and WW2 - admittedly a different set of circumstances - they were implemented; in WW1 the War Industries Board instituted price controls on industrial products related to war production; in WW2 the War Labor Board and Office of Price Administration instituted controls. (Local controls of prices have remained; for example, rent controls in NYC. In VA, Dominion and other energy companies have to have their rates approved by the State Corporation Commission.)

Carter apparently did not consider how the Union and Confederate governments handled inflation; for a short time each issued interest bearing currency.

Last edited by webster; 04-29-2023 at 05:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2023, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,704,481 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
That's so interesting, because Carter's second run for the Presidency was done in part on the platform of addressing the serious issues in the economy. Reagan waved away his concern, and made him look like a worry-wart. Reagan told the American people everything was ok. Then after he got into the Presidency, he had to recant.
What alternative history are you talking about? You keep making the claim that Reagan ignored the economy during the 1980 campaign, and people keep proving you wrong.

“Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.” - Ronald Reagan, September 1980
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 09:21 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116077
Quote:
Originally Posted by bus man View Post
There you go again.

You've made this claim before in this thread, and I called you out for it, yet here you are doing it again. So I would refer you to Mr. Reagan's own words, from his own mouth, as to how he described the economy. Note that this speech was made on October 24, 1980, shortly before the election.

Here's the actual 27-minute speech:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCTs0IeHkoY

Here's the transcript:

https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archiv...ress-americans
I'm going by what he said in the debates. When Carter would talk about the need to fix the economy, Reagan would respond with the bolded. You captured him perfectly in your quote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,555 posts, read 10,607,780 times
Reputation: 36567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
I'm going by what he said in the debates. When Carter would talk about the need to fix the economy, Reagan would respond with the bolded. You captured him perfectly in your quote.
"There you go again" was a quote that arose in the context of a discussion about Medicare. But it seemed prefect for the context in which I used it.

Here is the Carter-Reagan debate. Take a listen to the three minutes between 17:40 and 20:40. This does not sound like someone who is pooh-poohing the economy. Quite the opposite, actually.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HB2sz4bAbU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 05:07 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,000 posts, read 16,964,237 times
Reputation: 30099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
It wasn't a huge landslide. Only 25% of registered voters bothered to vote. Reagan won a majority of that 25%. Not really much to brag about. But Ronnie was a consummate actor. He could get a lot of people to believe almost anything, including that the economy was fine. He cast Carter as a worry-wart, for saying the economy was the #1 issue.
Reagan certainly did not indicate that the economy was fine. He asked "are you better off now than four years ago?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top