Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2008, 10:54 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,889,546 times
Reputation: 26523

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom9 View Post
I guess you didn't read the second paragraph of my post above. Here it is again,

As far as humane treatment of non-combatants it was not a very good thing because the radiation poisoning and other effects are still being felt by the people of Hiroshima (today) in the manner of deformed births and an extraordinary surge of cancer in the affected area.

Such condition did not and do not exist with the fire bombing of Dresden and Tokyo. Those are questions of immediate deaths resulting from the bombing. Hiroshima on the other hand is still suffering casualties today as a result of the bombing that took place there..
Ah what the heck, we can always use a new post on the atom bomb...

So my comment, apart from the very accurate comments that will follow and that have been mentioned in previous posts about how the planned invasion of Japan would have taken many many many many more Allied and Japansese military and civilian lives than the two atomic bombs have (from both the intitial bombing and later radiation poisoning)...

The concept of total war. In WW2 the economies of almost all nations and most certainly Germany and Japan, was geared towards the advancement of the war efforts. This differed from most other wars previously. Thus it made all military and civilians targets until an unconditional surrender. It wasn't a good thing, but it was just the reality of that terrible war at the time.

As for the radiation - I remember reading that the effects of radiation were not understood or anticipated at the time. Not that it would have made a difference and I would venture to guess that even with the deaths from radiation poisoning it would still be less than the deaths from conventional fire bombing sorties in Germany and Japan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2008, 10:56 AM
 
1,482 posts, read 2,384,482 times
Reputation: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
I did. I felt the logic was spurious.

Death is death. How is death by being exposed to radiation any different that the excruciating, lingering death of third-degree burns?
If several of your close relatives were dying because of a man made cause and you could be next..you still think all death is the same. I have to question your logic here. Is it because Americans dropped the bomb that you feel this? There is an awful lot of misplaced guilt concerning this subject. The bomb was dropped, People 63 years later are still dying from it's effects. Many of those people were not even born when the incident happened. Did you or I drop the bomb? It isn't our responsibility and to feel any guilt isn't either but to deny the facts is just nothing of no value. WTH do you care on an individual level what happened? I certainly don't. Let me ask just to clarify this. Do you think that a Japanese life is worth less than a German one or an Italian one. Sorry to ask but I am getting that feeling here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:06 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,889,546 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom9 View Post
because the radiation poisoning and other effects are still being felt by the people of Hiroshima (today) in the manner of deformed births and an extraordinary surge of cancer in the affected area.
..
You got my curiousity up on this fact - exactly how many casualties occured due to radiation poisoning for years after the bombing. Got this from a retired-military website, but it appears to be well documented with reliable sources:
How many people died at Hiroshima in August 1945?

"One possible source of confusion is where to stop counting the deaths of survivors. In 1978, the Japanese Reconstruction Survey compiled the times of death for 16,007 people known to have been present in Hiroshima. This survey found that 73.4% had died by 1 November 1945, and that an additional 5.6% had died between then and the October 1950 census. Interestingly, the latter death rate is 1.1% a year--almost exactly the normal mortality rate for the Japanese population."

"Deaths after December 1945 evidently were not very numerous, and they seem to have been adequately accounted for in the 1946 studies. Even the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (cited above) seems to confirm this. The foundation's website concludes that the number of excess deaths among 50,000 survivors who got a severe dose of radiation comes to only a few hundred, and certainly not as many as a thousand."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Stanwood, Washington
658 posts, read 830,969 times
Reputation: 172
When we've got the weapon, the enemy is close to having it, and the world will be safer with only us having it, they get nuked.

Japan=Iran?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:19 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,889,546 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom9 View Post
If several of your close relatives were dying because of a man made cause and you could be next..you still think all death is the same. I have to question your logic here. Is it because Americans dropped the bomb that you feel this? There is an awful lot of misplaced guilt concerning this subject. The bomb was dropped, People 63 years later are still dying from it's effects. Many of those people were not even born when the incident happened. Did you or I drop the bomb? It isn't our responsibility and to feel any guilt isn't either but to deny the facts is just nothing of no value. WTH do you care on an individual level what happened? I certainly don't. Let me ask just to clarify this. Do you think that a Japanese life is worth less than a German one or an Italian one. Sorry to ask but I am getting that feeling here.
I personally don't understand where you are going with this line of discussion...
None of us in support of the atomic boming of Japan feel guilt, rather we feel that it ended the war and saved lives, both Japanes and Allied, both civilian and military. The facts support this.
Germany or Italy? Again I don't understand - the atomic bomb was not ready in time before the war ended with Germany, and Italy surrendered in 1943.
Please note, this is the HISTORY forum, not the nonsense political forum here, people here know their history front and back and we expect responders here to also know it. If you don't - then expect to be brutally owned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:19 AM
 
78,385 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom9 View Post
If several of your close relatives were dying because of a man made cause and you could be next..you still think all death is the same. I have to question your logic here. Is it because Americans dropped the bomb that you feel this? There is an awful lot of misplaced guilt concerning this subject. The bomb was dropped, People 63 years later are still dying from it's effects. Many of those people were not even born when the incident happened. Did you or I drop the bomb? It isn't our responsibility and to feel any guilt isn't either but to deny the facts is just nothing of no value. WTH do you care on an individual level what happened? I certainly don't. Let me ask just to clarify this. Do you think that a Japanese life is worth less than a German one or an Italian one. Sorry to ask but I am getting that feeling here.
I want to see a source for your claims of birth defects and cancer rates vastly higher than average to this day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:35 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
I did. I felt the logic was spurious.

Death is death. How is death by being exposed to radiation any different that the excruciating, lingering death of third-degree burns?


For that matter, little mention is ever made of the millions of Ukrainians Stalin (our supposed ally) intentionally starved to death, a reputedly very difficult death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:37 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesandveybe View Post
When we've got the weapon, the enemy is close to having it, and the world will be safer with only us having it, they get nuked.

Japan=Iran?

One MAJOR difference between the two....................Pearl Harbor!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:37 AM
 
1,482 posts, read 2,384,482 times
Reputation: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
For that matter, little mention is ever made of the millions of Ukrainians Stalin (our supposed ally) intentionally starved to death, a reputedly very difficult death.
Did we have something to do with that directly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2008, 11:46 AM
 
2,769 posts, read 7,234,959 times
Reputation: 1487
Whatever the reason was, or however many lives it might have saved in the long run, I still think this is a very sad story and something that will never be OK in my book. I understand all the reasons people will point to as to why this was ultimately a good thing, but to me the bottom line was a whole lot of innocent people died not just in Hiroshima but in Nagasaki as well by a vicious bomb that in my opinion has no business existing. I know a lot of people will also say that if the Japanese discovered this bomb first they would have done the same thing to us, and that might be true, but no matter who created this evil bomb, and no matter who would have ever dropped it first, it's just flat out wrong, sad, and beyond evil to ever put any society through such terror and devastation.

I think Bob Marley sang it best in one of his songs;

"In this age of technological inhumanity,
Scientific atrocity,
Atomic misphilosophy,
Nuclear misenergy:
It's a world that forces lifelong insecurity"


I will definitely say a prayer for Hiroshima today, and for Nagasaki on Saturday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top