Re-Black Egypt (general, Asians, origin, years)

[Louisvilleslugger]

Originally Posted by Neng.

Apart from the fact that Egyptians were not black.

"Analysis of crania is the traditional approach to assessing ancient population origins, relationships, and diversity. In studies based on anatomical traits and measurements of crania, similarities have been found between Nile Valley crania from 30,000, 20,000 and 12,000 years ago and various African remains from more recent times (see Thoma 1984; Brauer and Rimbach 1990; Angel and Kelley 1986; Keita 1993). Studies of crania from southern predynastic Egypt, from the formative period (4000-3100 B.C.), show them usually to be more similar to the crania of ancient Nubians, Ku****es, Saharans, or modern groups from the Horn of Africa than to those of dynastic northern Egyptians or ancient or modern southern Europeans."
(S. O. Y and A.J. Boyce, "The Geographical Origins and Population Relationships of Early Ancient Egyptians", in Egypt in Africa, Theodore Celenko (ed), Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 20-33)

So of the listed populations above proven to overlap with Egyptian remains, which one's would not be considered black?

Those people are not black at all.

My source above flat out contradicts this statement.

Originally Posted by Eloy.

In one gold mask I have seen ... My face ! I am far . not the African.
Tell. What for in a coffin of the Pharaoh . Africans put heart and a liver from the Pharaoh.?

This was the Discovery Channel reconstruction of Tut based entirely on the golden mask.

[eloy]

Similar on 80 %
Only a nose at me "potato"

[Neuling]

This is a rather interesting article including the comments. By the way, the reconstruction of Tut looks different from the photo shown above.

I don't quite understand why some people want Egypt to be black African so much. There were other sophisticated civilizations, even in West Africa, where most slaves came from. Take the Nok culture and the Yoruba who probably descended from them. That is indeed a black African culture and probably not much less interesting than Egypt. One should not be blinded by the pyramids, those monuments are not really something to be proud of. In the end they are the product of superstition, just like modern cathedrals etc.

[eloy]

Me learnt. That someone has come there and has brought tools. Then people have disappeared.
These can explain contrast between qualitative (old) and not qualitative (new) processing of a stone. To make, process and put one block, it is necessary to spend 6.5 minutes.
The theory. To place blocks - the levitation was applied. As to a historical society it has been developed spiritually. Spiritual development has left with people.
I already spoke for example.

[eloy]

Refutation.
When priests did drawings - they did not understand Actions which saw. . When priests put bodies in a tomb - they saw surgical operations. But were not able to do them (it has turned to a cult - To put heart, a liver... In a tomb.). Skorobeu - not a perpetual motion symbol. The attention has been paid
On chitinous boards. The conclusion under a microscope - Skorobej ate warm manure for activation of "vortical cells" with electric impulses which created a carrying power . I am assured. As it was created. It is necessary to search not for a "materialistic" trace. It is necessary to search for a spiritual trace. Because create there "magicians" which could only have reached spiritual perfection. It was necessary to use energy for creation. It not everyone could reach. Therefore carriers of knowledge were lost. Now it is possible to rent the lorry. And in those days spiritual force was applied.

[Neuling]

Am I the only one who does not quite understand what you are talking about?

[Irishtom29]

Originally Posted by eloy

Refutation.
When priests did drawings - they did not understand Actions which saw. . When priests put bodies in a tomb - they saw surgical operations. But were not able to do them (it has turned to a cult - To put heart, a liver... In a tomb.). Skorobeu - not a perpetual motion symbol. The attention has been paid
On chitinous boards. The conclusion under a microscope - Skorobej ate warm manure for activation of "vortical cells" with electric impulses which created a carrying power .

Run that by me again Bubba.

[eloy]

All right. I do not know as to explain... But. You not there search for answers.

[Motion]

Let's acknowledge that no one knows exactly what King Tut and many of the Egyptians actually looked like or else this topic of what the Egyptians looked like wouldn't be the issue that it is. The Egyptians were indigenous north Africans but that doesn't automatically make them Black-Africans. The Berber are indigenous north Africans but aren't Black. The Egyptians also weren't related to the Nubians and Black west and central Africans as many believe. The Egyptians spoke an Afro-Asiatic language not related to the Nubian Nilo-Saharan language and west African Niger-Congo languages.

[Neuling]

Yes, the problem is that some people think African = black. But that is just not so, there have always been migrations from the Middle East and probably even Europe into Africa (I mean long before the middle ages). The Berbers have been living in most parts of North Africa for tens of thousands of years, which is a fact and not contended among scientists.
Again, nobody says the Egyptians were Swedes They were Mediterranean people with some black African influence and admixture, the greater the farther you go to the South.