Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015, 01:26 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,635,782 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

Quote:
that's quite the cross you're bearing there... you seem a bit insecure
Says the person to insecure to post it or leave their name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2015, 02:20 PM
 
Location: NC
9,361 posts, read 14,123,174 times
Reputation: 20920
Well built houses "of the McMansion persuasion" are not at issue in terms of durability. It is those that were built fast, cheap, and with less rigorously tested methods that I worry about. PedroMartinez, that home is lovely and looks like it will last a good long time. As long as the lot size is decent, I would be proud to live there myself!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2015, 04:50 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,698,390 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanLB View Post
This is an issue that definitely I consider when looking at houses. I would guess I have higher standards than 99% of home buyers because I'm not a house fan, in all honesty.

If money were no object, and when I eventually want my dream house probably when I'm more like 45 or 50 (haha), I know exactly how it's getting built and it's going to look nothing like the unoriginal ideas from most of these builders. I want a concrete home, steel reinforced if necessary, absolutely no wood except on the floors. I hate wood, it warps, it's lousy quality, and there's no good reason to use it in homes in most parts of the country. It's cheaper, but even then, it's not that much cheaper. I would argue it's much more expensive long-term because it's crappy as hell. I would build my house to look like an ultra-modern condo building with huge floor to ceiling windows overlooking the nearby river, and it would have perfect insulation and energy efficiency throughout. You would never see a bug. You would never hear a neighbor.

I would rather have a 6,000 square foot incredibly well made home than a 12,000 square foot slammed together pile of crap. And let's be honest, we all know at least some construction workers, they slap these things together with very little care.

My dad's house -- ironically - is an example of why I'd never built a house out of wood. It's 20,000 square feet, a true mansion, and gorgeous finishes throughout, by all means one of the grandest houses you could imagine, except that if you close the front door (which weighs 600 pounds), it literally rattled my bedroom on the other side of the house. That's unacceptable and why no house should be framed out of wood. That would never happen if you built it out of concrete, and if you really love the ugly wooden look, you could put ugly wood on the outside. Ick.
I owned a home that was concrete block and concrete under stucco and it suffered earth quake damage during the Loma Prieta earthquake... non wood framed residential construction poses additional problems here in earthquake country...

Each method of construction has benefits...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2015, 05:13 PM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,381,268 times
Reputation: 22904
I think of McMansions as in-fill houses built lot line to lot line in historic areas that fail to honor the overall character of the original neighborhood. Some of them are extremely nice; they just don't fit. They tend to pop up in gentrified areas and are the source of a lot of community conflict. It would seem, though, that my definition of McMansion is out of sync with general perception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2015, 05:50 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,094 posts, read 83,020,975 times
Reputation: 43671
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomparent View Post
I think of McMansions as in-fill houses built lot line to lot line in historic areas that fail to...
That's how they started.

Quote:
It would seem, though, that my definition of McMansion is out of sync with general perception.
Nope. But over the 30 years since that "style' (or lack of) has been embraced by developers.
That's how you end up with those cul de sacs of the dead where no one is seen outside except the gardeners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2015, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,653,067 times
Reputation: 4803
Some are done with thought to how they will look in the surrounding neighborhood.

Many look like gigantic boxes with no architectural detail or a mishmash of details from various period styles that look busy.

Some are oversized for the plot of land they sit on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 09:17 AM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,920,830 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by MckinneyOwnr View Post
My own house... A McMansion. The previous owners bought it brand new, and it was clearly more home than they could afford, so they didn't get ANY options. It was about the most plain Jane house you could buy, but it's huge. We had to go in after we bought it and upgrade everything.
I don't quite understand why people on this thread (not you) look down on buying the biggest house you can afford with cheap finishings. Finishings can be ugraded and changed. It is much more expensive and difficult to add size.

When we moved to FL we bought a pretty large cookie-cutter house in a gated subdivision. We wanted a lot of space. The upgrades that the builder offered were more expensive and not as nice as what we could add later. So we had the house built with minimal upgrades (just floors). The builder wanted $6K to have the house painted a color other than white. And for $6K the entire house had to be painted the same non white color. Who would do that? We bought the house painted hospital white and paid someone $3K to paint the house the colors that we wanted.

Of course when we moved in the house was a giant, plain, builder grade box. However, we upgraded things (added a pool, redid the kitchen and bathrooms) over the years that we lived there. We were pretty careful to pay cash for things that we wanted but that didn't add value (pool) and we financed improvements that would add to the value of the house.

The people who bought your home may have been planning to do the same thing we did but ran out of money. IMO it is better to buy the size/layout home you need/want and to worry about finishings later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 09:29 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,698,390 times
Reputation: 23268
A builder friend has always done well on his spec homes...

His friends are critical because he builds big boxes that vary little... buyers buy because they get the most square footage for the money... his finishes are simple... nothing high end to raise the prices...

McMansions wouldn't sell if buyers didn't buy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2015, 04:26 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
146 posts, read 449,810 times
Reputation: 69
How about this one?

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=san+j...,,0,-1.27&z=20

McMansion or nah?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2015, 12:15 PM
 
1,380 posts, read 2,399,734 times
Reputation: 2405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma_bear View Post
I don't quite understand why people on this thread (not you) look down on buying the biggest house you can afford with cheap finishings.
How would you feel about a woman (or man) who wore heaps and heaps of what was obviously costume jewelry? Rings, necklaces, earrings, bracelets. Absolutely loaded down with obviously fake gold and diamonds. It just make you want to roll your eyes in dismissal. That's how people view the McMansion. There's such a contrast between trying to be showy and clearly inferior materials. It's not even about interior finishes. Nobody but the owner sees those. It's about the godawful exteriors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top