Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2017, 09:55 PM
 
487 posts, read 467,549 times
Reputation: 654

Advertisements

Please share your experience with Self-Monitoring Home Security System with Camera. Looking at all and very interested on what the folks here on City-Data think on their home security systems. Prefer those with no monthly fee THANK YOU!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2017, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, AK
7,448 posts, read 7,588,269 times
Reputation: 16456
I just use Samsung Smartcams. You can check from your home computer or smartphone. They also do push notifications when activity is detected. Cheap and easy to set up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 08:44 AM
 
11,230 posts, read 9,321,790 times
Reputation: 32252
I would consider a German Shepherd dog, myself. Self-monitoring: check. Cameras: two of 'em. No monthly fee: check - well, unless you consider dog food, vet bills, etc. Ability to make decisions and use judgement: check. Ability to deter evildoers from doing evil: check. Ability to secure and immobilize evildoers if they penetrate the perimeter: check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 08:51 AM
 
9,868 posts, read 7,700,279 times
Reputation: 22124
Good thread to start.

Dogs require that you come home to take care of them, so they are not a substitute for equipment. Plus some criminals would either bribe them with food or shoot them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:18 AM
 
Location: WMHT
4,569 posts, read 5,672,673 times
Reputation: 6761
Exclamation Cameras are NOT a substitute for "real" alarm

Cameras are a valuable adjunct to enhance security, but the in-camera video motion detection of the best IP camera will be much more prone to false positives than even the cheapest professionally installed alarm with PIR and perimeter switches.

There are a few models of WiFi camera with a PIR sensor to trigger on any moving warm body; this is a good start, but still inferior to a real monitored alarm with supervision, etc.

Since nearly all cameras require low-voltage power wiring anyway, I'd rather go with hardwired Ethernet-connected cameras using Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) rather than connecting via WiFi. This does require running Cat5/6 cable to a central location, but eliminates the extra failure point of wireless networking.


Before buying your first camera, take a look at the list of cameras supported by Xprotect Go, Zoneminder, and Surveillance Center. If you standardize on models supported by one or more of these, you should be able to add an in-home network video recorder (NVR) at a later date.

Your best bet for compatibility is to look for cameras which explicitly claim ONVIF Profile S compliance with this logo:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder
31,304 posts, read 32,883,423 times
Reputation: 84477
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoDeb View Post
Please share your experience with Self-Monitoring Home Security System with Camera. Looking at all and very interested on what the folks here on City-Data think on their home security systems. Prefer those with no monthly fee THANK YOU!!!!
I have had my security cameras and DVR unit for five years now and find it’s very valuable to knowing what is happening at times, I monitor my own unit through wi-fi or directly on the DVR & monitor.

My neighbor had a motion detection unit inside the house that was monitored by the security company. He was burglarized one night and the security company didn’t call the police because they needed to check with the homeowner first. I heard the disturbance of the breaking in at the backdoor. I checked and then called the police myself for him. The criminals were gone from the house in under 5 minutes which is normal. My security cameras were positioned in such a way to at least see the two guys leave and get into their car driving the opposite direction from my home; otherwise I would have good information on the description of the car.

The neighbor bought his own security cameras and discontinued the monitoring service. He now checks on his video remotely and doesn’t worry about a security company monthly billing or their failure to call the police.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2017, 01:32 AM
 
1,668 posts, read 1,487,407 times
Reputation: 3151
I have several Panasonic and D-Link standard definition cameras. Some wired, some wireless. It's not always easy to run CAT5 to where I want the camera. All were bought on sale or clearance priced. About $19 to $40 each. They are inside and outside the house. They can be viewed from anywhere with a computer, tablet or phone. I use an android ap IP Cam Viewer Lite on my phone and tablets to view several Panasonic cams at once. D-Link has their own ap. The camera manufacturers provide a free DDNS service. Motion detected pictures are emailed to a email account off site. Lots of false triggering occurs so hundreds of pictures often get sent. It ain't perfect.The house was re roofed while we were 2000 miles away and i was able to somewhat watch the work. I can see if a package is delivered and have a neighbor pick it up. I put a large dial thermometer in view of one of the indoor cams so i can check the interior temperature.
Sometimes something happens to the network and some of the cameras become unreachable remotely but they continue to email pictures. The cameras cost nothing to use other than perhaps a share of what I pay to my internet provider.
The cameras are not a substitute for a monitored security system. I pay about $120 a year for security system monitoring. Monitor company will dispatch if they are unable to reach anyone on the call list.
The security system and monitoring service have nothing to do with the cameras.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2017, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Heart of the desert lands
3,976 posts, read 1,990,933 times
Reputation: 5219
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoDeb View Post
Please share your experience with Self-Monitoring Home Security System with Camera. Looking at all and very interested on what the folks here on City-Data think on their home security systems. Prefer those with no monthly fee THANK YOU!!!!
I have found self monitoring works OK if you have your smart phone with you consistently, and are willing to check it at any time.

I have installed CCTV systems in all of my residences since 2003, I have made six moves since that time. Products and features available have only improved since then. I had systems with as few as two cameras, and as many as 15 cameras. I have never paid for a monitoring system.

What I have found:

1- Wifi cameras are only as reliable as your wifi signal, and sometime less so (cheap ones tend to drop connection on their own). I do not trust them as much as POE or analog cameras. Security needs to be consistent to work, and wifi cameras are not always consistent.

2- Motion detection driven alerting is still not a perfected art form. Get used to false alerts if you only use motion detection. It is better to have a space covered with a camera, and a separate sensor such as a door/window contact, glass break sensor, or passive infrared volumetric sensor actually trigger an alert for self monitoring. These sensors are connected to dry contact inputs on a POE switch or into the DVR recording the views, and are programmed to alert you instead of the motion detection software the cameras typcally use.

3- I still prefer quality analog cameras, that feed into a networked DVR. There is more up front labor (and cost, if one is not self installing), but they are simply more reliable in my experience, and less prone to latency issues when viewing them live.

Instead of using big box store packaged systems, or online packages via amazon such as Night Owl, Lorex, etc...., I have been very happy with a vendor out of Texas called Super Circuits.

https://www.supercircuits.com

If you call them, they will assist you in putting together a system that will meet your needs. I have used their pro grade Alibi products for years.

Last edited by snebarekim; 08-27-2017 at 12:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2017, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder
31,304 posts, read 32,883,423 times
Reputation: 84477
One of my neighbors bought a wireless security camera system and can’t monitor it remotely from the iphone unless he has the computer router removed from the ip; can’t use both the computer, router and DVR at the same time. He’s very unhappy with it when he leaves the house as everything has to be done directly at the DVR unit. He said it had something to do with the ip connected to the router and couldn't be connected to the dvr unit at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2017, 02:28 PM
 
Location: WMHT
4,569 posts, read 5,672,673 times
Reputation: 6761
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnd393 View Post
I use an android ap IP Cam Viewer Lite on my phone and tablets to view several Panasonic cams at once.
I'm really happy with the android app called "tinyCam Monitor", I was using the free edition, to get rid of the ads and to support the creator I bought "tinyCam Monitor PRO" (currently on sale at 50% off). It works on even my oldest Android devices, so I use one of my otherwise useless no-service phones as a dedicated camera viewer.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AksarbeN View Post
One of my neighbors bought a wireless security camera system and can’t monitor it remotely from the iphone unless he has the computer router removed from the ip; can’t use both the computer, router and DVR at the same time. He’s very unhappy with it when he leaves the house as everything has to be done directly at the DVR unit. He said it had something to do with the ip connected to the router and couldn't be connected to the dvr unit at the same time.
Sounds like a bad router and/or a configuration problem. Get an expert to look at it.

Last edited by Nonesuch; 08-27-2017 at 02:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top