Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2019, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,475 posts, read 66,064,806 times
Reputation: 23626

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by timfountain View Post
Well, when you look at most of Europe, including Italy which is one area that does have earthquakes, I'd have to say yes. It is much much more durable, doesn't need painting and looks great. Wood is cheap and relatively plentiful and quick to put up. It's great for builders, not so much for owners.

Most of EU has very strict laws about forestry (so the "supply&demand" thing plays strong)- so the primary building material is concrete/block/stone.

Did you see the destruction that happened in Abruzzo, Italy two years ago? Not very durable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2019, 01:50 PM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,050,479 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by timfountain View Post
Well, when you look at most of Europe, including Italy which is one area that does have earthquakes, I'd have to say yes. It is much much more durable, doesn't need painting and looks great. Wood is cheap and relatively plentiful and quick to put up. It's great for builders, not so much for owners.
Wood is not cheap and plentiful in Europe. It was largely deforested centuries ago.

You are right that most structures in Italy are not wooden. But the majority of stoke structures have suffered tremendously from earthquakes, and many have fallen. It takes a great deal of time and money to keep the older stone buildings habitable. Most structures built post WW2 are reinforced concrete.

Take a look at some statistics on housing prices in Europe. They are much higher than the US on average, and ithat is one reason why people in Europe live at home to a later age, and people buy their first home st a later age, than the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 02:27 PM
 
3,493 posts, read 3,204,853 times
Reputation: 6523
In cold temperate climates brick homes are better insulated in winter; probably the same thing in hot climes, too. Up to F4, a brick veneer home will tolerate a tornado at least one F rating higher than a frame home. Brick veneer homes are generally quieter inside. Other than that, I've never noticed a difference and have lived in both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,475 posts, read 66,064,806 times
Reputation: 23626
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinbrookNine View Post
In cold temperate climates brick homes are better insulated in winter...
The cladding on the exterior of a home has nothing to do with how well it is insulated. Insulation ratings are based on zone regions.

As far as the brick having any R-value, call it very minimal at best!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Flyover part of Virginia
4,218 posts, read 2,459,291 times
Reputation: 5066
Quote:
Originally Posted by timfountain View Post
Well, when you look at most of Europe, including Italy which is one area that does have earthquakes, I'd have to say yes. It is much much more durable, doesn't need painting and looks great. Wood is cheap and relatively plentiful and quick to put up. It's great for builders, not so much for owners.
If the production home builders had their way, we'd be paying 300k for a straw house to live in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Flyover part of Virginia
4,218 posts, read 2,459,291 times
Reputation: 5066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungalove View Post
My 1927 bungalow was built from old growth Douglas fir for the structural elements/trim and heart pine for the floors. It held up extremely well despite the very high water table, high humidity, and the extraordinary stressors coming from the adjacent Naval base (explosive shocks). That house also went through the Virginia earthquake with only one crack in the house - it just swayed but stood firm (I was inside at the time). However, it is extremely expensive to build with true old growth materials, if you can even find them.
Do you live in Norfolk?

Old growth wood is great stuff, but we can't build out of that material anymore. The old growth forests of Michigan and Wisconsin, of Arkansas and the Appalachia, are mostly gone, and what little that remain of them are protected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 06:53 PM
 
6,362 posts, read 4,190,693 times
Reputation: 13065
Masonry has close to zero insulation values. A brick veneer has an R value of .44 while a 3 1/2 inch wall, depending on the insulation can range from an R11 to an R15 so technically, the brick offers the same R value as 1/2 inch drywall which is just about nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:47 AM
 
599 posts, read 499,042 times
Reputation: 2196
Quote:
Originally Posted by corydon View Post
Most brick houses have two walls with space between in. They inject the insulation between them.
Thirty five years in the trades, and an owner of two different custom home building companies. I can assure you that if you change your statement from "most" to "far less than 1%" you will be factually correct. I can only speak for the majority of what I've been exposed to in the lower 48, but there is rarely a significant space between the "wythes" or layers of brick, to add meaningful insulation. There is also some legitimate concern that long term durability of these structures, once injected with foam, will be compromised.

I live in a mixed climate in the northeast. It is fairly cold in the winter, with overnights in the teens pretty common, and hot and wet in the summer. I now own a 1950s all masonry home. Block and brick, with furring and plaster on the interior. My place was one of the last built in the region using this technique, and for good reason. For this climate, it is absolutely inferior to a stick framed place with brick veneer. No legitimate way to insulate the walls, hot in summer, cold in winter, and measurably less pleasant to occupy as compared to a stick framed home with even a modest amount of wall insulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:51 AM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,285,635 times
Reputation: 40985
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinbrookNine View Post
In cold temperate climates brick homes are better insulated in winter; probably the same thing in hot climes, too. Up to F4, a brick veneer home will tolerate a tornado at least one F rating higher than a frame home. Brick veneer homes are generally quieter inside. Other than that, I've never noticed a difference and have lived in both.
I think there's a huge difference between a brick veneer home and a real brick home. Veneer means the brick is simply there for decoration purposes on the exterior of the house. Often it's not even real brick but a thin layer of brick material pasted to the exterior of the house. It's not what the house is made of.
I thought the topic was about a home made of masonry vs wood frame. A brick veneer home is a wood frame home.

Last edited by marino760; 11-10-2019 at 06:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:40 AM
 
Location: Virginia
10,093 posts, read 6,436,538 times
Reputation: 27661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taggerung View Post
Do you live in Norfolk?

Old growth wood is great stuff, but we can't build out of that material anymore. The old growth forests of Michigan and Wisconsin, of Arkansas and the Appalachia, are mostly gone, and what little that remain of them are protected.
No, further up the coast. Norfolk doesn't do any weapons testing, AFAIK. Actually, our local base is the only facility in the country to do down range firing of large guns over water (up to 23 miles). You can imagine the stress the explosive force has on the nearby houses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top